Incentives and individualized coaching improves completion rates of supervised exercise therapy for claudication.

OBJECTIVE: Supervised exercise therapy (SET) provides clinical benefit for patients suffering from intermittent claudication and has been widely recommended as first-line therapy before endovascular or surgical intervention. However, published rates of SET program completion range from 5% to 55%, with historic completion of 54% at our own institution. As such, we sought to identify if targeted patient-supportive interventions improve SET completion rates while still maintaining efficacious SET programming. METHODS: Patients who were diagnosed with intermittent claudication, as defined by ankle-brachial index (ABI) <0.9 without rest pain, were offered enrollment in a prospective quality improvement protocol for our 12-week SET for peripheral artery disease program. Program completion was defined as ≥24 of 36 offered sessions over 12 weeks. A three-pronged approach was utilized to improve completion during the study, including financial incentives up to $180, scheduled coaching with our advanced practitioner staff, and informational materials on the importance of SET programming and lifestyle modification. Patient-reported improvements in walking symptoms were tracked via regularly administered questionnaires. Functional measures of SET programming including total walking duration and distance, metabolic equivalent of task, and ABIs; vascular intervention within 12-months after enrollment was also collected and compared using univariate paired analysis. RESULTS: In total, seventy-three patients were enrolled in SET for peripheral artery disease programming over the study period. Utilizing our three-pronged coaching approach, 56 patients completed SET programming, increasing our SET completion rate to 76.7% over a 2-year study period. Compared with pre-SET baseline, patients who completed SET noted less pain, aching, cramps in calves when walking (P = .004), and less difficulty walking 1 block (P = .038). Additionally, patients significantly increased their metabolic equivalent of task (3.1 vs 2.6; P < .001), total walking duration (30 mins vs 13.5 mins; P < .001), and total walking distance (0.7 vs 0.3 miles; P < .001) from their pre-SET baseline. There were no changes in participant ABIs from enrollment to completion in participants. Patients who completed SET programming also delayed vascular intervention compared with those who did not complete SET or declined participation (213.5 vs 122.5 days from enrollment; P = .041). CONCLUSIONS: Targeted incentives, including cost-coverage vouchers and personalized coaching with instructional materials, successfully improved patient completion of a prescribed SET program. Patients who completed SET programming reported subjective improvement in walking symptoms and objective walking benefits. In addition, these patients had delayed time to vascular intervention, supporting current vascular guidelines advocating for effective SET therapy prior to offering vascular intervention for intermittent claudication.

Patient Reported Barriers for Participation in Supervised Exercise Therapy for Symptomatic Peripheral Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND: Supervised exercise therapy (SET) provides clinical benefit for patients suffering from intermittent claudication due to peripheral artery disease (PAD). However, enrollment in programs when offered remains low. We sought to identify patient-reported barriers to enrollment in SET as part of a prospective quality improvement program. METHODS: Patients who presented to clinic and were diagnosed with claudication were offered enrollment in a prospective quality improvement protocol, offered at 9 regional offices throughout our health system. Both patients who enrolled and declined enrollment were offered a 12-question questionnaire to identify potential barriers to enrollment. Additional data including gender, smoking status, ankle-brachial index (ABI), proximity to the nearest regional office, and disadvantage levels of neighborhoods (low: 1-3, medium: 4-7, and high: 8-10 area deprivation index [ADI]) was collected and compared by program participation using univariate analysis. RESULTS: Patients enrolled in the SET program (n = 66 patients) versus those who declined (n = 84 patients) were of similar age (medium age: 71.4 vs. 69.7 years, P = 0.694), baseline ABI (0.6 vs. 0.6, P = 0.944), smoking status (former 56.1% vs. 53.6%, P = 0.668), distance away from outpatient center (8.2 mi vs. 8.4 mi, P = 0.249), and had similar Connecticut state ADIs (2021 high-disadvantage: 35.4% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.549). Patients participating in the SET program were more likely to be male (78.8% vs. 56.0%, P = 0.003). Top self-reported barriers for patients who declined participation included transportation/distance (39.3%), preference for independent walking (56.0%), inability to commit to 3 sessions per week (52.4%), and lack of interest (20.2%). In addition, a higher proportion of patients who declined participation identified severe barriers of preference for independent walking (39.3% vs. 1.5%, P < 0.001), inability to commit to 3 sessions per week (26.2% vs. 3.0% P < 0.001), transportation/distance issues (23.8% vs. 7.6% P = 0.008), and cost (27.4% vs. 9.1%, P = 0.005) as significant barriers for participation in SET. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who declined participation in SET for PAD had similar disease status and access to care than participating counterparts. Top reported barriers to enrollment include a preference for independent walking, transportation/distance, commitment to 3x/week program, and cost, which highlight areas of focus for equitable access to these limb-saving services.

Cerebral intolerance during flow arrested carotid angioplasty.

INTRODUCTION: The use of flow arrest as a means of providing cerebral protection during carotid angioplasty offers the advantages of improved efficiency of debris removal and the ability to provide protection under unfavorable (tortuous) anatomic circumstances. However, in contrast to the filtration methods of cerebral protection, this modality requires complete interruption of antegrade carotid artery flow during balloon angioplasty and stent deployment. METHODS: We report our experience with 9 patients undergoing carotid angioplasty with the Mo.Ma device, which utilizes common and external carotid artery balloon occlusion during the angioplasty procedure. We assessed the clinical outcomes and intraprocedural hemodynamic data. RESULTS: The average duration of carotid occlusion was 8.3 minutes. Of the 9 patients, 2 patients (22%) experienced cerebral intolerance. No stroke occurred in this patient cohort. There appeared to be a poor relationship between procedure intolerance and the presence of significant contralateral stenosis or low carotid back pressure. Furthermore, the incidence of postangioplasty hypotension was not clearly related to cerebral intolerance. CONCLUSION: Carotid angioplasty with stenting can be safely conducted with flow arrest as an alternative to filter-type cerebral protection devices. However, because cerebral intolerance is not an infrequent occurrence with this approach, clinicians must be cognizant of management strategies for transient cerebral intolerance.

Crossing an ultracritical carotid stenosis for carotid angioplasty.

Carotid angioplasty requires early placement of a cerebral protection device in an effort to minimize cerebral embolization during the conduct of the subsequent angioplasty and stenting procedure. In patients who exhibit a very critical internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis (approximately 99%), initial passage of the lesion may not be possible with a standard 0.014-inch wire system. In this report, the authors describe an approach using a 0.012-inch hydrophilic system to overcome this technical obstacle.