A Chronic Aquatic Hazard Assessment for the Perfume Raw Material Octahydro-tetramethyl-naphthalenyl-ethanone.

Octahydro-tetramethyl-naphthalenyl-ethanone (OTNE) is a high-production volume fragrance material used in various down-the-drain consumer products. To assess aquatic risk, the Research Institute for Fragrance Materials (RIFM) uses a tiered data-driven framework to determine a risk characterization ratio, where the ratio of the predicted-environmental concentration to the predicted-no-effect concentration (PNEC) of <1 indicates an acceptable level of risk. Owing to its high production volume and the conservative nature of the RIFM framework, RIFM identified the need to utilize a species sensitivity distribution (SSD) approach to reduce the PNEC uncertainty for OTNE. Adding to the existing Daphnia magna, Danio rerio, and Desmodesmus subspicatus chronic studies, eight new chronic toxicity studies were conducted on the following species: Navicula pelliculosa, Chironomus riparius, Lemna gibba, Ceriodaphnia dubia, Hyalella azteca, Pimephales promelas, Anabaena flos-aquae, and Daphnia pulex. All toxicity data were summarized as chronic 10% effect concentration estimates using the most sensitive biological response. Daphnia magna was the most sensitive (0.032 mg/L), and D. subspicatus was the least sensitive (>2.6 mg/L, the OTNE solubility limit). The 5th percentile hazardous concentration (HC5) derived from the cumulative probability distribution of the chronic toxicity values for the 11 species was determined to be 0.0498 mg/L (95% confidence interval 0.0097-0.1159 mg/L). A series of "leave-one-out" and "add-one-in" simulations indicated the SSD was stable and robust. Add-one-in simulations determined that the probability of finding a species sensitive enough to lower the HC5 two- or threefold was 1/504 and 1/15,300, respectively. Given the high statistical confidence in this robust SSD, an additional application factor protection is likely not necessary. Nevertheless, to further ensure the protection of the environment, an application factor of 2 to the HC5, resulting in a PNEC of 0.0249 mg/L, is recommended. When combined with environmental exposure information, the overall hazard assessment is suitable for a probabilistic environmental risk assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 2024;43:1378-1389. © 2024 SETAC.

Multi-laboratory evaluation of the reproducibility of polymer biodegradation assessments applying standardized and modified respirometry methods.

This research evaluated the intra- and interlaboratory variability when applying OECD 301F and OECD 301B Ready Biodegradation respirometric test methods to quantify polymer biodegradation as well as the impact of method modifications including test duration, inoculum level and test substance concentration on results. This assessment synthesizes results of mineralization studies on 5 polymers of varying structural components, molecular weight, charge, and solubility, evaluated at 8 different laboratories in 4 different countries, providing significant geographic variation in inoculum source as well as lab to lab variations in test setup. Across all laboratories, intralaboratory variability was low (≤18 % absolute difference) indicating the reproducibility of results between replicates and uniformity of test setup in each laboratory. Interlaboratory variation was also low for all 5 polymers with extent of mineralization being comparable in all OECD 301F and 301B studies even when test methods were modified. Across all studies mean mineralization was 89 ± 5.5 % for polyethylene glycol 35,000, 85 ± 7.4 % for polyvinyl alcohol 18-88, 44 ± 13 % for carboxymethyl cellulose (DS 0.6), 48 ± 4.1 % for a modified guar gum, and 88 ± 6.2 % for microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) at study completion. Due to the lack of polymeric reference materials, MCC was evaluated and found to be a suitable reference material for polymers that biodegrade rapidly in screening studies. An additional respirometric study was conducted quantifying mineralization of the 5 polymers in river water to evaluate the relationship with OECD 301 results using activated sludge as the inoculum. A similar extent of mineralization was observed for all 5 polymers in the OECD 301 and river water studies but time to reach the maximum extent of mineralization was longer using river water as the inoculum source likely due to the lower microbial counts (106 CFU/L) in the test system.

Aquatic testing guidelines insufficiently control the influence of dilution water toc and hardness on cationic polymer toxicity - A proposal to improve standardized test procedures.

Cationic polymers (CPs) are widely used chemicals for wastewater treatment applications and in various "down-the-drain" household products. The aquatic toxicity of CPs results from an electrostatic interaction with negatively charged cell surfaces. These effects are greatly mitigated by the binding affinity of CPs to total organic carbon (TOC) in surface water. Consequently, baseline aquatic toxicity tests of CPs using clean lab water (TOC < 2 mg/L) typically overestimate toxicity and risk which is greatly mitigated at higher environmentally relevant OC levels. However, the point at which mitigation begins is not well defined and low-level TOC in lab water may influence the baseline toxicity outcome. Similarly, divalent cations, quantified as water hardness, may modulate the electrostatic binding between OC and CP. Although standard guidelines define limits for lab water hardness and TOC, the consequences of variability within those limits on test outcome is unknown. We investigated the impact of part-per-billion (ppb) additions of TOC to lab water at different hardness levels on CP acute toxicity to Daphnia magna and Raphidocelis subcapitata. In both species, the acute toxicities of CPs with different molecular weight and charge density varied by > 10-fold in response to slight changes in TOC and water hardness, although parameters were maintained within guideline limits. When determining the baseline aquatic toxicity of CPs, the lab water should be standardized at the lowest biologically tolerable hardness and TOC at a reliably measurable level (>1 - < 2 mg/L) to reduce variability and increase the reliability of the toxicity estimate.

Core chemistry influences the toxicity of multicomponent metal oxide nanomaterials, lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide, and lithium cobalt oxide to Daphnia magna.

Lithium intercalation compounds such as lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide (NMC) and lithium cobalt oxide (LCO) are used extensively in lithium batteries. Because there is currently little economic incentive for recycling, chances are greater that batteries will end up in landfills or waste in the environment. In addition, the toxicity of these battery materials traditionally has not been part of the design process. Therefore, to determine the environmental impact and the possibility of alternative battery materials, representative complex battery nanomaterials, LCO and NMC, were synthesized, and toxicity was assessed in Daphnia magna. Toxicity was determined by assessing LCO and NMC at concentrations in the range of 0.1 to 25 mg/L. Acute studies (48 h) showed no effect to daphnid survival at 25 mg/L, whereas chronic studies (21 d) show significant impacts to daphnid reproduction and survival at concentrations of 0.25 mg/L for LCO and 1.0 mg/L for NMC. Dissolved metal exposures showed no effect at the amounts measured in suspension, and supernatant controls could not reproduce the effects of the particles, indicating a nanomaterial-specific impact. Genes explored in the present study were actin, glutathione-s-transferase, catalase, 18s, metallothionein, heat shock protein, and vitellogenin. Down-regulation of genes important in metal detoxification, metabolism, and cell maintenance was observed in a dose-dependent manner. The results show that battery material chemical composition can be altered to minimize environmental impacts. Environ Toxicol Chem 2017;36:2493-2502. © 2017 SETAC.

Molecular interactions of nanomaterials and organisms: defining biomarkers for toxicity and high-throughput screening using traditional and next-generation sequencing approaches.

The toxicity of nanomaterials depends on the basic interaction of the chemistry of the material with the molecular pathways in an organism. To design safe and sustainable nanomaterials, more detailed information on the molecular interaction and biochemical machinery that is altered in an organism upon contact with a nanomaterial is needed. There are a multitude of papers now on the toxicity of nanomaterials to various model organisms from human to ecological models, but many focus on acute high dose exposures and research on the toxicity of other chemicals has shown that the dose of a chemical can have a tremendous impact on the pathways that are affected within the organism. The most common pathways investigated in nanotoxicity experiments are related to oxidative stress, yet oxidative stress can be a temporary and natural response to an insult without a negative outcome. There are a multitude of other potential mechanisms that may be triggered in response to a toxin at sublethal exposures. Here we present a review documenting the evidence to date on the indicators of the molecular response to nanomaterials from in vitro and in vivo studies. Alternative pathways as indicated by single biomarker, global gene expression studies and next generation sequencing approaches are discussed as well as the impacts of nanomaterial type, dose, and the types of system studied. Specific mechanisms that are impacted by a nanomaterial can be used as the basis of better high-throughput methods for evaluating how nanomaterial chemistry impacts toxicity and support models to predict the toxicity of future nanomaterials.