Ultrasonographic assessment and clinical outcomes after deployment of a suture-mediated femoral vascular closure device.

INTRODUCTION: Data regarding changes in the arterial vascular wall after the deployment of suture-mediated vascular closure devices (VCD) at the femoral site in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary angiography (CAG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are sparse. This study investigated the occurrence of structural vascular changes or adverse vascular complications at the access site in the short term after the deployment of a suture-mediated intravascular VCD. METHODS: Ninety-three patients (72% males) with a mean age of 62 ± 11 years were enrolled. Duplex sonography was conducted at the access site at baseline, 24 hours and 30 days after femoral puncture in patients with successful VCD deployment. Vessel diameter, flow velocities, the severity of atherosclerosis, and the intravascular or perivascular tissue alterations in both the right common femoral artery (RCFA) and right external iliac artery (REILA) were assessed. Vascular complications were documented. RESULTS: There were no significant changes regarding the diameter of the RCFA in the transverse and longitudinal view, peak systolic velocity (PSV) of the RCFA, PSV ratio of the RCFA to REILA, the resistive index of the RFCA and the severity of arterial wall abnormalities before femoral puncture, the day following VCD deployment and 30 days after (p = NS for all) in the general population and in patients with diabetes mellitus, on oral anticoagulants or with mild peripheral artery disease (p = NS for all markers). Device failure was observed in four cases. Few (4.4%) patients had vascular complications, which included exclusively major or minor haematomas, most of which did not persist at the 30-day follow up. CONCLUSION: The use of a suture-mediated VCD was safe and was not associated with adverse vascular wall changes at the femoral access site 30 days after deployment in patients undergoing CAG and/or PCI.

Hemodynamic Comparison between the Avalus and the Perimount Magna Ease Aortic Bioprosthesis up to 5 Years.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare hemodynamic performance of the Avalus (Medtronic) and the Perimount Magna Ease (PME, Edwards Lifesciences) bioprosthesis up to 5 years by serial echocardiographic examinations. METHODS: In patients undergoing aortic valve replacement, 58 received PME prostheses between October 2007 and October 2008, and another 60 received Avalus prostheses between October 2014 and November 2015. To ensure similar baseline characteristics, we performed a propensity score matching based on left ventricular ejection fraction, age, body surface area, and aortic annulus diameter measured by intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography. Thereafter, 48 patients remained in each group. Mean age at operation was 67 ± 6 years and mean EuroSCORE-II was 1.7 ± 1.1. Both values did not differ significantly between the two groups. RESULTS: At 1 year the mean pressure gradient (MPG) was 15.4 ± 4.3 mm Hg in the PME group and 14.7 ± 5.1 mm Hg in the Avalus group (p = 0.32). The effective orifice area (EOA) was 1.65 ± 0.45 cm2 in the PME group and 1.62 ± 0.45 cm2 in the Avalus group (p = 0.79). At 5 years the MPG was 16.6 ± 5.1 mm Hg in the PME group and 14.7 ± 7.1 mm Hg in the Avalus group (p = 0.20). The EOA was 1.60 ± 0.49 cm2 in the PME group and 1.51 ± 0.40 cm2 in the Avalus group (p = 0.38). Five-year survival was 88% in the PME group and 91% in the Avalus group (p = 0.5). In the PME group, there were no reoperations on the aortic valve, whereas in the Avalus group three patients required a reoperation due to endocarditis. CONCLUSION: Both bioprostheses exhibit similar hemodynamic performance during a 5-year follow-up.

Association of Growth Differentiation Factor 15 with Arterial Stiffness and Endothelial Function in Subpopulations of Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

BACKGROUND: Growth-differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) is a biomarker belonging to the transforming growth factor-beta cytokine superfamily, which is linked to many pathological conditions, including inflammation and myocardial injury. Pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) and augmentation index (AIx) are indices of arterial stiffness, which are associated with the severity of coronary artery disease (CAD). Flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) is a well-studied surrogate marker of endothelial-dependent dysfunction and systemic inflammation. OBJECTIVE: In this proof-of-concept study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between circulating GDF-15, endothelial dysfunction, and indices of arterial stiffness in different settings of coronary artery disease and myocardial injury. METHODS: In this cross-sectional single-center study, we enrolled patients (n = 22) after interventional treatment for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), patients (n = 11) admitted with chest pain and elevated cardiac enzymes but without evidence of obstructing CAD (MI-NOCAD) in percutaneous coronary angiography (CAG), and patients (n = 20) who underwent CAG according to indications without evident obstructive CAD in CAG (NOCAD). FMD was assessed at the brachial artery. AIx of the central aortic pressure and cfPWV were estimated by applanation tonometry at the radial and carotid-femoral site, respectively, with a validated acquisition system (Sphygmo- Cor, AtCor Medical, Sydney (NSW), Australia). ELISA was used to determine circulating GDF- 15 serum levels (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). Clinical and demographic data and values of routine biochemical biomarkers were obtained. The highest high-sensitive cardiac Troponin I (hsTpnI) value during hospitalization was also recorded. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was assessed with a transthoracic echocardiogram. RESULTS: Patients with AMI were older, had worse LVEF, higher values of hsTpnI and increased circulating GDF-15 levels. Importantly, AMI patients had increased cfPWV values, deteriorated AIx values, blunted FMD and worse serum creatinine levels compared to MI-NOCAD and NOCAD patients, respectively, whereas MI-NOCAD and NOCAD did not differ from each other significantly on these biomarkers. Both AMI and MI-NOCAD patients presented a higher but comparable white blood cell count than NOCAD patients. A strong linear correlation between GDF-15 and cfPWV, hsTpnI, AIx, white blood cell count and creatinine but not with FMD was demonstrated in the general study population. CONCLUSION: This proof-of-concept study showed that higher circulating levels of GDF-15, an inflammatory biomarker, were associated significantly with increased arterial stiffness only in AMI patients, whereas elevated GDF-15 demonstrated a linear relationship with the severity of the myocardial injury.