[Medical educational evaluation of the German Pain Congress 2012. In the context of the CanMEDS physician competency framework]. / Deutscher Schmerzkongress 2012 aus medizindidaktischer Sicht. Bewertung unter Berücksichtigung der im Rahmenmodell CanMEDS definierten Arztrollen.

BACKGROUND: Professionals in the medical field are expected to participate in continuing medical education in the sense of lifelong learning. The authors took this occasion to evaluate the most important national convention in pain medicine concerning its role in medical education. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The participants of the 37th German Pain Congress (17-20 October 2012 in Mannheim) were asked to complete a questionnaire concerning content and design of the convention. The aim of this study was to analyze the distribution of different physician competencies in the program. For this purpose the congress program was analyzed with respect to the various medical role models as defined in the Canadian medical education directions for specialists (CanMEDS) framework. RESULTS: The participants considered the quality of the different sessions of the German Pain Congress to be good. The poster sessions were considered to be the second most important educational format in the congress following the live sessions. Concerning the content of the congress the participants wished more emphasis on the role of interprofessional partners, such as nursing and psychotherapy. The CanMEDS physician roles of manager, communicator, health advisor and professional paragon were underrepresented in the congress program in this study. CONCLUSION: Regarding content and educational value, the congress design could benefit from additional Praktikerseminaren (practical seminars). The role of interprofessional partners should be more emphasized. In addition the program could become more attractive through a more balanced distribution of the CanMEDS roles.

[Interventional pain therapy. Results of a survey among specialized pain physicians in Germany]. / Interventionelle Schmerztherapie. Ergebnisse einer bundesweiten Umfrage unter speziellen Schmerztherapeuten.

BACKGROUND: Interventional pain therapy aims to treat pain which is refractory to pharmacologic and noninterventional treatment. Due to the partly lacking evidence and recommendations it remains unclear when interventional methods should be applied within the treatment pathway. This study assesses the current state of interventional methods in Germany and their leading indications comparing with the recommendations found in the literature. METHODS: An online survey was conducted among German physicians specialized in pain therapy concerning the number of interventions they perform per quarter, which supporting measures they use, and their indications for sympathetic blocks, sensory blocks, intrathecal administration, and spinal cord stimulation. RESULTS: A total of 109 physicians (23.5 %) participated in the survey. Blocks are most often performed on the stellate ganglion (94 %) and on the superior cervical ganglion (82 %). They are supported by anatomical landmarks and less often by imaging control. Both classic neuropathic pain diagnoses (e.g., complex regional pain syndrome) and diagnoses with a neuropathic pain component (e.g., peripheral arterial disease, tumor pain, and back pain) were considered as indications to perform interventional procedures. CONCLUSION: Although there is no clear evidence on interventional procedures in the current literature, these methods are often performed by the respondents. Anatomic landmarks are most frequently used for orientation. The German pain physicians who responded consider especially neuropathic pain as an indication to perform interventional procedures for pain therapy.

[Cost minimization analysis in postoperative pain management : economic efficiency and effectiveness of two infusion pump systems]. / Kostenminimierungsanalyse in der postoperativen Schmerztherapie : Wirtschaftlichkeit und Effektivität von 2 Schmerzpumpensystemen.

BACKGROUND: Besides reliable efficacy and patient satisfaction, economic efficiency is becoming increasingly more important in postoperative pain management. AIM: The present study investigated the effectiveness of two pain pump systems and compared the running costs in treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study 40 patients received an interscalene catheter prior to shoulder surgery. Postoperative pain management was provided via an electronic pump with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) or a mechanical pump without PCA. Patients kept a pain log. After treatment they were interviewed about their satisfaction with the pump. In addition drug consumption, nursing material, staff time for handling and maintenance of the pumps and preparation of medications pro re nata were assessed. RESULTS: Postoperative pain levels and patient satisfaction were comparable in both groups. Economically, the electronic pump was more cost-effective than the electronic model for a duration of treatment of 1 and 2 days. With treatment duration of 2 days the costs of both pumps were equivalent; however, the PCA feature of the electronic pump allowed a reduced intake of systemic analgesics on demand. CONCLUSION: Both pain pump systems provide equally effective pain management, while the electronic model caused less costs. Both pumps offer advantages and disadvantages that should be considered based on local circumstantial demands.