Are targeted therapies or immunotherapies effective in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma?

Metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a major health burden due to its increasing incidence and poor prognosis. PDAC is characterized by a low tumor mutational burden, and its molecular pathogenesis is driven by Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutations. Response to DNA damage through homologous repair is defective in 15% of tumors. Chemotherapy using FOLFIRINOX (folinic acid, fluorouracil, irinotecan, oxaliplatin) or gemcitabine-nab-paclitaxel significantly improves life expectancy, but the median overall survival remains <1 year. Targeted therapies are not efficient in the overall population of patients with metastatic PDAC. Improvements in overall survival or progression-free survival, however, have been demonstrated in subgroups carrying certain mutations. Maintenance therapy with poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors increases progression-free survival in patients with germline mutations in BRCA1/2. Sotorasib shows signs of efficacy against tumors carrying the KRAS G12C mutation, and targeted therapies may also benefit patients with KRAS-wild-type PDAC. Combining targeted therapies with chemotherapy holds promise because of potential synergistic effects. These associations, however, have not yet demonstrated clinical benefit. Checkpoint inhibitors are not effective against metastatic PDAC. Combined immunotherapies attempt to restore their efficacy but have not succeeded yet. Other immunotherapies are emerging such as therapeutic vaccines or chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, but these strategies remain to be evaluated in large trials. In the future, treatment personalization based on tumor-derived organoids could potentially further improve treatment efficiency.

The choice for the optimal therapy in advanced biliary tract cancers: Chemotherapy, targeted therapies or immunotherapy.

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) represent a heterogeneous group that includes intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (CCAs), perihilar-CCAs or Klatskin tumors, extrahepatic-CCAs, and gallbladder adenocarcinoma. These entities have distinct demographics, risk factors, clinical presentation, and molecular characteristics. In advanced BTCs, the recommendations are mainly supporting a doublet chemotherapy regimen using cisplatin/gemcitabine (CisGem) with a 5-year overall survival rate close to 5% and median overall survival (mOS) of less than a year. The lack of overall efficacy stresses the need for personalized therapies. Recently, whole-genome and transcriptome sequencing highlighted the diversity of BTCs' subtypes. Distinct genetic alterations were retrieved according to the localization, with a high rate of potentially actionable alterations. Targeted therapies and immunotherapy have since then been tested for BTCs, trying to propose a more personalized treatment. This review describes the different therapeutic options, validated and in development, for patients with advanced BTCs.

Hepatitis B virus reactivation in patients with solid tumors receiving systemic anticancer treatment.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is a well-known risk during chemotherapy for hematological malignancies with reported rates ranging between 14% and 72%. However, there is a paucity of data regarding HBV infection management and reactivation risk in patients receiving systemic treatments for solid tumors. DESIGN: We conducted a PubMed search for publications from January 1990 until May 2016 related to HBV reactivation. The search terms were 'hepatitis B reactivation', cross-referenced with 'chemotherapy', then 'hepatitis B' cross-referenced with International Non-proprietary Name of each of the most used chemotherapy drugs in solid tumors. RESULTS: From these data, a grading of HBV reactivation risk and recommendations for management are given for most frequently used anticancer drugs in solid tumors. CONCLUSION: Most drugs used for the treatment of solid tumors can induce hepatitis B reactivation in HBs antigen-positive patients. HBV screening can be recommended before systemic treatment initiation. Pre-emptive antiviral treatment can reduce the risk of HBV reactivation and prevent chemotherapy disruption.

Application of ANAES guidelines for colonoscopy in France: a practical survey.

OBJECTIVES: In 2004, the French health authorities published guidelines on the indications for colonoscopy. However, no study has evaluated the awareness of healthcare practitioners of these guidelines. The aim of this study was to determine the level of awareness of the ANAES guidelines among French gastroenterologists. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A questionnaire comprising 20 multiple choice questions (MCQ) was presented to a group of 79 gastroenterologists between February and June in 2008. The questions covered screening tests for colon cancer (one question), endoscopic mucosal resection (two questions) and the ANAES guidelines (17 questions). According to the number of colonoscopies performed per year (less than 100, 100-500, more than 500), the answers to these questions were analyzed separately. RESULTS: Among the practitioners carrying out less than 100, 100-500 and more than 500 colonoscopies per year, the guidelines for colon cancer screening were known by 33, 50 and 56%, respectively, the quality criteria for endoscopic mucosal resection by 0, 0 and 3.7%, respectively, and the ANAES guideline indications for colonoscopy by 34.3, 51.2 and 48.9%, respectively (P<0.001). The ANAES guidelines were significantly better known by practitioners who were performing more than 100 colonoscopies per year, while the indications for control colonoscopy were less often correctly anticipated. No differences were found concerning postponed indications. CONCLUSION: The ANAES guidelines consists of the following elements: (1) awareness of the ANAES guidelines is poor, with control colonoscopy being correctly anticipated in just over a third of the gastroenterologists; (2) performing more than 100 colonoscopies per year improves knowledge of the ANAES guidelines; and (3) the ANAES guidelines need to be simplified and should be covered by continuing medical education.

Portal venous gas following chemotherapy for colorectal cancer liver metastasis.

The standard of care for patients with colorectal liver metastases is a combination of chemotherapy and surgery. New chemotherapy regimens with biologic agents (cetuximab, bevacizumab) have been shown to increase tumor response rates. Although this might be beneficial and this is an expected endpoint, it should be noted that patients with synchronous colorectal and liver metastases are at risk of septic complications. We recently encountered a case of hepatic portal venous gas after two cycles of chemotherapy in a patient with right colon cancer liver metastases. Complete necrosis of the liver metastasis subsequently turned into a liver abscess, which fistulized in the right portal vein. Infection of the necrotized metastasis was thought to be promoted by the colic tumor. Although this is a dramatic situation, it does not contraindicate a curative surgical resection.

Quality control of colonoscopy procedures: a prospective validated method for the evaluation of professional practices applicable to all endoscopic units.

OBJECTIVES: To produce valid information, an evaluation of professional practices has to assess the quality of all practices before, during and after the procedure under study. Several auditing techniques have been proposed for colonoscopy. The purpose of this work is to describe a straightforward original validated method for the prospective evaluation of professional practices in the field of colonoscopy applicable in all endoscopy units without increasing the staff work load. METHODS: Pertinent quality-control criteria (14 items) were identified by the endoscopists at the Cochin Hospital and were compatible with: findings in the available literature; guidelines proposed by the Superior Health Authority; and application in any endoscopy unit. Prospective routine data were collected and the methodology validated by evaluating 50 colonoscopies every quarter for one year. RESULTS: The relevance of the criteria was assessed using data collected during four separate periods. The standard checklist was complete for 57% of the colonoscopy procedures. The colonoscopy procedure was appropriate according to national guidelines in 94% of cases. These observations were particularly noteworthy: the quality of the colonic preparation was insufficient for 9% of the procedures; complete colonoscopy was achieved for 93% of patients; and 0.38 adenomas and 0.045 carcinomas were identified per colonoscopy. CONCLUSION: This simple and reproducible method can be used for valid quality-control audits in all endoscopy units. In France, unit-wide application of this method enables endoscopists to validate 100 of the 250 points required for continuous medical training. This is a quality-control tool that can be applied annually, using a random month to evaluate any changes in routine practices.

Importance of histological tumor response assessment in predicting the outcome in patients with colorectal liver metastases treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by liver surgery.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to characterize histological response to chemotherapy of hepatic colorectal metastases (HCRM), evaluate efficacy of different chemotherapies on histological response, and determine whether tumor regression grading (TRG) of HCRM predicts clinical outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: TRG was evaluated on 525 HCRM surgically resected from 181 patients, 112 pretreated with chemotherapy. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were correlated to TRG. RESULTS: Tumor regression was characterized by fibrosis overgrowing on tumor cells, decreased necrosis, and tumor glands (if present) at the periphery of HCRM. With irinotecan/5-fluorouracil (5-FU), major (MjHR), partial (PHR), and no (NHR) histological tumor regression were observed in 17%, 13%, and 70% of patients, respectively. With oxaliplatin/5-FU, MjHR, PHR, and NHR were observed in 37%, 45%, and 18% of patients, respectively. Five patients, treated with oxaliplatin, had complete response in all their metastases. MjHR was associated with an improved 3-year DFS compared with PHR or NHR. MjHR and PHR were associated with an improved 5-year OS compared with NHR. CONCLUSION: Histological tumor regression of HCRM to chemotherapy corresponds to fibrosis overgrowth and not to increase of necrosis. TRG should be considered when evaluating efficacy of chemotherapy for HCRM. Histological tumor regression was most common among oxaliplatin-treated patients and associated with better clinical outcome.

[Hemolytic uremic syndrome as a complication of gemcitabine treatment: report of six cases and review of the literature]. / Syndrome hémolytique et urémique secondaire à la gemcitabine: à propos de six observations et revue de la littérature.

UNLABELLED: Hemolytic uremic syndrome is a rare condition during gemcitabine therapy. METHODS: We report six new cases of hemolytic uremic syndrome related to gemcitabine, three issued from a retrospective study of 136 consecutive patients treated with gemcitabine for which a systematic screening of this side effect has been performed and 29 cases with clinical data available identified in the literature in order to better characterised frequency and clinical presentation of this side effect. RESULTS: In our series, frequency of HUS is 2.2% and is higher than this previously reported (0.015%) or estimated with the data of clinical trials analysed (0.072 %). For 35 cases with clinical data available, the patients were always treated for a local advanced and/or metastatic disease. For our cases and for literature cases, at the time of diagnosis of hemolytic uremic syndrome, mean number of doses received (mean+/-standard deviation. Minimum/maximum)) (personal cases: 26.5+/-6.6. 16/36, literature cases: 21+/-11. 8/54), cumulative dose received (g/m2) (personal cases : 24.5+/-6.3. 16/31.6, literature cases: 21.7+/-12.4. 2.4/54) and duration of treatment (months) (personal cases: 8.2+/-1.9. 5.6/11, literature cases: 8.5+/-4.0. 3/18) are very closed and high individual variations observed for these factors are not consistent with a time and/or dose dependant toxicity. New-onset hypertension or exacerbation of underlying hypertension is the most common clinical manifestation, with mild anemia; thrombocytopenia is inconstant. The degree of severity of renal failure is highly variable. The existence of subacute clinical form with progressive worsening of the symptoms and biological form at the time of diagnosis suggest the interest of a systematic clinical and biological screening of this side effect, before each injection of gemcitabine. Early prognosis is linked to the evolution of hemolytic uremic syndrome and after hemolytic uremic syndrome healing, cancer progression. Treatment include gemcitabine discontinuation, antihypertensive drugs and if necessary fresh frozen plasma. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic clinical and biological screening of hemolytic uremic syndrome during gemcitabine therapy should allow to better know this complication, to recognize and treat it earlier with a potential positive impact for patients.

Severe hepatic sinusoidal obstruction associated with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: In advanced metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma, the addition of a neo-adjuvant systemic treatment to surgery might translate into a survival advantage, although this is yet to be confirmed by ongoing randomized trials. The objective of this study was to assess the effects of preoperative systemic chemotherapy on the morphology of non-tumoral liver. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A large series of surgically resected liver metastases (n=153) was selected. Light microscopy, electron microscopy, and immunohistochemistry using antibodies against endothelial cells (CD31) and hepatic stellate cells (alpha-SM actin, CRBP-1) were performed to identify sinusoidal wall integrity. RESULTS: We found that 44 (51%) of the 87 post-chemotherapic liver resection specimens had sinusoidal dilatation and hemorrhage, related to rupture of the sinusoidal barrier. In contrast, the 66 livers treated by surgery alone remained normal. In 21 out of the 44 post-chemotherapy patients (48%), perisinusoidal and veno-occlusive fibrosis also developed. Sinusoidal injury persisted several months after end of chemotherapy, and fibrosis may progress. Development of lesions was strongly correlated to the use of oxaliplatin; 34 out of 43 patients (78%) treated with this drug showed striking sinusoidal alterations. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer frequently causes morphological lesions involving hepatic microvasculature. Sinusoidal obstruction, complicated by perisinusoidal fibrosis and veno-occlusive lesion of the non-tumoral liver revealed by this study, should be included in the list of the adverse side-effects of colorectal systemic chemotherapy, in particular related to the use of oxaliplatin.