[Neurology meets Urology : Overview of urologically relevant neurological diseases]. / "Neurology meets Urology" : Übersicht urologisch relevanter neurologischer Erkrankungen.

In addition to the classical neurourological diseases multiple sclerosis and paraplegia/spina bifida, there are many and also widely spread diseases of the neurological spectrum that can result in significant dysfunctions of the urinary tract. Depending on the location (cerebral/suprapontine, spinal/suprasacral, spinal infrasacral and peripheral), different disorders can result (detrusor overactivity and underactivity, sphincter dyssynergia and low compliance). Changes can also occur over the course of an illness and thus make the analysis of the respective disorder even more difficult. Not all patients present directly to a neurourological center and in some cases the connection is not directly apparent. Firstly, this article focuses on the urological relevance of the respective neurological disease. Secondly, the basic neurourological information should support the initial assessment of the disorder.

Desperate need for better management of Fournier's gangrene.

INTRODUCTION: To compare earlier and later patient groups with Fournier's gangrene, specifically with the incidence of rising antibiotic resistance rates in mind. Primary endpoints were to compare therapy, outcomes, and resistance rates. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A multicentric, retrospective, multi-national study was performed. Two groups with different time frames of treatment were defined: Group 1 (n = 50) and Group 2 (n = 104). Demographics and outcomes were analysed using Student-t test, chi-square test, or Fisher exact test. Survival data were estimated using the Kaplan Meier method and compared by Log rank testing. RESULTS: There were no significant demographic differences. Nor was there any significant difference in therapy or outcomes in the groups except for the duration of intensive care unit treatment, which lasted a mean 6.3 days in Group 1 and 11.5 days in Group 2 (p = 0.018). Survival time did not improve over the years (p = 0.268). We fortunately did not observe an increased rate of multi-resistant organisms (p = 1.000). This study's limitations are mainly due to its retrospective study design. CONCLUSIONS: Despite increasing antibiotic resistance rates worldwide, it was not apparent in our population. But the situation for these patients is alarming, since final outcome failed to improve over the last ten years despite more intensive critical-care therapy.

Severe proarrhythmic potential of risperidone compared to quetiapine in an experimental whole-heart model of proarrhythmia.

In several case reports, proarrhythmic effects of antipsychotic drugs have been reported. The aim of the present study was to investigate if application of risperidone or quetiapine has the potential to provoke polymorphic ventricular tachycardia in a sensitive model of proarrhythmia. In 24 isolated rabbit hearts, risperidone (5 and 10 µM, n = 12) or quetiapine (5 and 10 µM, n = 12) was infused after obtaining baseline data. Eight endocardial and epicardial monophasic action potentials and a simultaneously recorded 12-lead ECG showed a significant QT prolongation after application of risperidone as compared with baseline (5 µM: +29 ms, 10 µM: +35 ms, p < 0.01) accompanied by an increase of action potential duration. Administration of risperidone also significantly increased spatial dispersion of repolarization (5 µM: +16 ms, 4 µM: +19 ms; p < 0.05) as well as temporal dispersion of repolarization. Lowering of potassium concentration in bradycardic AV-blocked hearts provoked early afterdepolarizations (EADs) in 8 of 12 hearts and polymorphic ventricular tachycardia resembling torsade de pointes in 6 of 12 hearts (10 µM, 49 episodes). The results were compared with hearts treated with quetiapine (5 and 10 µM). Quetiapine led to an increase in QT interval (5 µM: +10 ms; 10 µM: +28 ms; p < 0.05) and a similar increase of APD90. However, treatment with quetiapine did not result in significant alterations of spatial and temporal dispersion of repolarization. No ventricular arrhythmias were observed in this group. In the present study, quetiapine demonstrated a safe electrophysiologic profile despite significant QT prolongation. In contrast, risperidone led to a more marked prolongation of myocardial repolarization combined with a more marked increase of dispersion of repolarization.

Low proarrhythmic potential of citalopram and escitalopram in contrast to haloperidol in an experimental whole-heart model.

In several case reports proarrhythmic effects of citalopram and escitalopram have been reported. Systematic analyses on prorarrhythmic effects of these drugs are not yet available. The aim of the present study was to investigate if application of citalopram, escitalopram or haloperidol provokes polymorphic ventricular tachycardia in a sensitive model of proarrhythmia. In isolated rabbit hearts monophasic action potentials and ECG showed a significant QT-prolongation after application of citalopram (2µM: +47ms, 4µM: +56ms, P<0.05) accompanied by an increase of action potential duration (APD) but not dispersion of repolarization. Reduced potassium concentration in bradycardic AV-blocked hearts provoked early afterdepolarizations (EAD) in 2 of 12 hearts but no polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (pVT). Application of escitalopram also increased QT-interval (2µM: +3ms, 4µM: +30ms, P<0.05) and APD without effects on dispersion. 3 of 10 hearts showed EAD and pVT in 2 of 10 hearts (32 episodes). The results were compared to 12 rabbits treated with haloperidol which led to an increase in QT-interval (1µM:+62ms; 2µM:+96ms; P<0.01), APD and dispersion (1µM:+15ms, 2µM:+40ms; P<0.01) and induced EAD in all 12 and pVT in 10 of 12 hearts (152 episodes). Citalopram and escitalopram demonstrated a rather safe electrophysiologic profile despite significant QT prolongation. In contrast, haloperidol led to significant increase of dispersion of repolarization while this parameter remained stable under the influence of citalopram or escitalopram. These results imply that application of citalopram or escitalopram is not as proarrhythmic as some case reports might suggest while haloperidol is torsadogenic.