Outcomes of Preoperative Medical Therapy for Thyroidectomy in Autoimmune Thyroid Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Thyroidectomy provides definitive treatment for autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD) often resulting in improved quality of life. Historically, patients with AITD undergoing thyroidectomy have increased rates of postoperative hypoparathyroidism and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy. We investigated the outcomes of preoperative medications in patients with AITD undergoing thyroidectomy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent thyroidectomy for AITD at a single institution from 2015 to 2021. Surgical outcomes and perioperative laboratory values were analyzed by type of AITD and type of preoperative medical treatment: none, saturated solution of potassium iodide (SSKI), corticosteroids, or both SSKI and corticosteroids. RESULTS: A total of 123 patients underwent thyroidectomy for AITD and were included in analysis: 50 received no preoperative medications, 40 received SSKI, 20 received corticosteroids, and 13 received both. Seventy-six patients had Graves' disease and 47 had Hashimoto's thyroiditis. There were no significant differences in blood loss, operative time, wound complications, hematoma, or recurrent laryngeal nerve injury for patients treated with preoperative corticosteroids compared to those who were not. Patients who received corticosteroids and patients with Graves' disease more commonly had at least one instance of hypocalcemia postoperatively (P < 0.01, P = 0.01), although only on postoperative day 1 was mean calcium < 8.5 mg/dL. There was no difference in rate of transient or permanent hypoparathyroidism. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received corticosteroids preoperatively had no increased risk of complications. They did have mildly lower calcium levels in the early postoperative period, although no difference in hypoparathyroidism. Further exploration is warranted to investigate the impact of preoperative corticosteroids on operative difficulty, quality of life, and autoantibody clearance.

The effects of tranexamic acid on blood loss and transfusion rate in colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to evaluate safety of tranexamic acid (TA) administration and to assess bleeding risk in colorectal surgery (CRS). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including consecutive patients undergoing elective CRS by a single surgeon between August 2014 and May 2015. All patients received 1 g of TA intravenously at induction and at closure. Demographics, operative and postoperative details were prospectively assessed and compared to a historical control cohort. RESULTS: 213 patients were evaluated. TA did not increase complications, readmissions, or reoperation rates. Significant postoperative hemoglobin (Hgb) drop (≥3 g/dL) (TA: n = 6, 7.4%, Control: n = 22, 16.6%; p = 0.193) and transfusion rates (intraoperative: TA: n = 2, 2.5%, Control: n = 2, 1.5%; p = 0.586, postoperative: TA: n = 1, 1.2%, Control: 9, 6.8%; p = 0.065) were not statistically different. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative hemoglobin drop and transfusion rates were not decreased statistically. Further study is warranted given the large clinical differences in favor of TA.

The Comet Assay: Automated Imaging Methods for Improved Analysis and Reproducibility.

Sources of variability in the comet assay include variations in the protocol used to process the cells, the microscope imaging system and the software used in the computerized analysis of the images. Here we focus on the effect of variations in the microscope imaging system and software analysis using fixed preparations of cells and a single cell processing protocol. To determine the effect of the microscope imaging and analysis on the measured percentage of damaged DNA (% DNA in tail), we used preparations of mammalian cells treated with etoposide or electrochemically induced DNA damage conditions and varied the settings of the automated microscope, camera, and commercial image analysis software. Manual image analysis revealed measurement variations in percent DNA in tail as high as 40% due to microscope focus, camera exposure time and the software image intensity threshold level. Automated image analysis reduced these variations as much as three-fold, but only within a narrow range of focus and exposure settings. The magnitude of variation, observed using both analysis methods, was highly dependent on the overall extent of DNA damage in the particular sample. Mitigating these sources of variability with optimal instrument settings facilitates an accurate evaluation of cell biological variability.