Educational interventions improving knowledge about epilepsy in preschool children.

OBJECTIVE: Sufficient public knowledge about epilepsy is a starting point for reducing epilepsy-related stigma and improving quality of life of people with this condition. Thus, interventions aimed at improving such knowledge are greatly needed. However, there is a significant lack of such interventions and none have been applied to preschool children. We aimed to develop effective interventions using the educational board game Action Zone! and a technique known as educational story, and by focusing on the acquisition of knowledge about epilepsy in children aged 5-6 years with no previous knowledge of epilepsy. METHODS: Knowledge about epilepsy was measured using a 20-item test consisting of questions selected from educational game and an 11-item test used successfully in our previous intervention study focused on children aged 9-11 years. Both measures exhibited acceptable internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha of 0.72 and 0.67. In total, 296 children participated in three intervention studies (educational game, educational story, and a revised version of educational story). Level of knowledge was assessed immediately after each intervention and again one month later. RESULTS: We found that all interventions were effective (p = 0.001) in comparison of retest results with baseline of zero level of knowledge based on the statements of children before intervention. Intervention based on educational game resulted in a higher percentage of correct responses in comparison with educational story (p = 0.020). However, the revised version of educational story developed using participatory action research was superior in comparison with the original version (p < 0.001) and fully comparable with educational game (p = 0.864). CONCLUSIONS: The results showed the aforesaid interventions were significant and effective ways to establish basic knowledge about epilepsy in the given age group.

Psychometric properties of the Czech versions of the Impact of Pediatric Epilepsy Scale (IPES) and Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory for Adolescents (QOLIE-AD-48).

OBJECTIVE: In order to introduce a complex system of monitoring and evaluation of the heath-related quality of life (HRQoL) of children and adolescents with epilepsy (CWE) and their families in the Czech Republic, we aimed to validate the Czech versions of two appropriate instruments - the Impact of Pediatric Epilepsy Scale (IPES) and the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory for Adolescents (QOLIE-AD-48). METHODS: The verification of the 11-item IPES was carried out in the group of parents of 248 CWE aged 2-18 years. One hundred and thirty-five CWE from the given group aged 11-18 years then completed the 48-item QOLIE-AD-48. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability (with a three-month interval) and the factorial structure of the Czech versions were determined and compared with the original instruments. RESULTS: We found that the Czech version of the IPES exhibited very good psychometric properties including high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha, α, of 0.93), high test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC, of 0.76) and the same 3-factor structure as the original instrument. The superiority of this 3-factor solution over the alternate 2-factor model proposed for some language versions of the IPES was determined using confirmatory factor analysis. We found 8 items in the Czech version of the QOLIE-AD-48 belonging to original Attitudes towards epilepsy and Social support subscales that do not fit well with the Czech version due to their low correlation with the total score and insufficient test-retest reliability and should be omitted. For the remaining 40 items, we have determined high internal consistency (α = 0.95) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.82). Confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the 6-factor solution derived from the original instrument (without two removed subscales) was appropriate for the Czech version. The individual subscales exhibited high internal consistency with α = 0.61-0.91. The external validation of both instruments was confirmed based on a significant correlation between test results and physicians' reports of the characteristics of the child's epilepsy. CONCLUSIONS: The Czech versions of both instruments studied are reliable and valid, and can be used in the next research focusing on the effect of different treatment approaches on the HRQoL of CWE and their families.