Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull ; 30(8): 995-1008, 2004 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15257784

RESUMO

Two studies examined whether a criminal defendant's race influences Whites' sensitivity to legally relevant information. In Study 1, prosecution case strength ratings and guilt likelihood ratings were more sensitive to the strength of the defendant's alibi when he was Black than when he was White, if the experimental task was designed to elicit low processing motivation. Under high motivation, participants were equally sensitive to alibi strength, regardless of defendant race. In Study 2, the alibi strength manipulation was replaced with a manipulation of the effectiveness of the district attorney's cross-examination. As predicted, defense case strength ratings were more sensitive to the strength of the prosecutor's cross-examination with a Black defendant than with a White defendant-under low motivation. Under high motivation, sensitivity did not depend on defendant race. These results suggest that a Black defendant can elicit greater sensitivity to legally relevant information than will a White defendant.


Assuntos
Atitude , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Crime/legislação & jurisprudência , Processos Mentais , Percepção Social , População Branca , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Julgamento , Masculino , Motivação
2.
J Appl Psychol ; 87(1): 112-20, 2002 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11916205

RESUMO

The authors investigated eyewitnesses' retrospective certainty (see G. L. Wells & A. L. Bradfield, 1999). The authors hypothesized that extemal influence from the lineup administrator would damage the certainty-accuracy relation by inflating the retrospective certainty of inaccurate eyewitnesses more than that of accurate eyewitnesses (N = 245). Two variables were manipulated: eyewitness accuracy (through the presence or absence of the culprit in the lineup) and feedback (confirming vs. control). Confirming feedback inflated retrospective certainty more for inaccurate eyewitnesses than for accurate eyewitnesses, significantly reducing the certainty-accuracy relation (from r = .58 in the control condition to r = .37 in the confirming feedback condition). Double-blind testing is recommended for lineups to prevent these external influences on eyewitnesses.


Assuntos
Criminologia , Retroalimentação Psicológica , Rememoração Mental , Reconhecimento Psicológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Percepção Visual
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA