Patient Perception of Social Media Use by Orthopaedic Surgeons: A Pilot Study.

Background: Social media (SM) use by orthopaedic surgeons is becoming increasingly common; nonetheless, it needs to be clarified how patients perceive the content posted by physicians. Purpose: To characterize SM content posted by orthopaedic surgeons while investigating patient perceptions of this content and how it may influence their health care decisions. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Posts on SM outlets by orthopaedic surgeons were reviewed and categorized. A survey to assess patient perception of these categories was administered between December 2021 and February 2022 in the clinics of 3 orthopaedic surgeons. Survey results were analyzed for differences in patient SM use and perception of SM content types. Results: There were 250 completed surveys. SM use was high among all age groups; however, the 18 to 24 years (87.1%) and 25 to 34 years (86.4%) age groups were more likely than older age groups to report daily use (P = .002). Overall, 17% of patients reported using SM to see information about their health care at least once per month, 21% reported reviewing the SM account of a physician at least once per month, 19% reported that they were likely or very likely to view the SM account of their physician, and 23% reported that SM content was likely or very likely to influence which physician they see. Patients held the most consistently positive view of posts that educated patients, discussed sports team coverage, and provided patient testimonials. Patients had consistently neutral views of posts educating colleagues, discussing presentations at national meetings, displaying aspects of surgeons' personal lives, and supporting marginalized groups. Several post categories elicited highly polarized responses-including those discussing research publications and showing surgical techniques or pictures/videos taken during surgery. Respondents had a consistently negative response to posts making political statements. Conclusion: SM is likely a useful tool to help physicians interact with patients. Physicians who wish to interact with patients should consider posting content viewed most positively-including posts educating patients, discussing sports team coverage, and providing patient testimonials. Content that is viewed less favorably should be posted sparingly or with a sensitive tag.

Rate of Conversion to Matrix-Induced Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation After a Biopsy: A Multisurgeon Study.

Background: Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) and matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) are performed to treat focal chondral defects (FCDs); both are 2-step procedures involving a biopsy, followed by transplantation. There is little published research evaluating ACI/MACI in patients who undergo a biopsy alone. Purpose: To determine (1) the value of ACI/MACI cartilage biopsies and concomitant procedures in patients with FCDs of the knee and (2) the conversion rate to cartilage transplantation as well as the rate of reoperation. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of 46 patients (63% female) who underwent a MACI (or ACI) biopsy between January 2013 and January 2018. Preoperative data, intraoperative data, and postoperative outcomes were assessed at a minimum of 2 years after the biopsy. The conversion rate from a biopsy to transplantation and the reoperation rate were calculated and analyzed. Results: Among the 46 patients included, 17 (37.0%) underwent subsequent surgery, with only 12 undergoing cartilage restoration surgery, for an overall transplantation rate of 26.1%. Of these 12 patients, 9 underwent MACI/ACI, 2 underwent osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA), and 1 underwent particulated juvenile articular cartilage implantation at 7.2 ± 7.5 months after the biopsy. The reoperation rate was 16.7% (1 patient after MACI/ACI and 1 patient after OCA) at 13.5 ± 2.3 months after transplantation. Conclusion: Arthroscopic surgery with debridement, chondroplasty, loose body removal, meniscectomy/meniscal repair, and other treatment approaches of knee compartment abnormalities at the time of a biopsy appeared to be sufficient in improving function and reducing pain in patients with knee FCDs.

Incorporating Biologics Into Your Sports Medicine Practice: Who, What, When, Why, and How?

Orthobiologic techniques can be used in the treatment of a variety of sports medicine pathologies, using an evidence-based approach focused on the value of all available approaches. The orthopaedic surgeon should be aware of the indications for and any technical pearls and pitfalls related to the use of orthobiologic agents as treatment for, or as an adjunct to management of, common sports medicine injuries and pathologies. Expected outcomes, including return to sport/activity, as well as potential complications and how to avoid them, should be considered. Although promising results have been reported, significant lack of high-level studies, inconsistent findings, and variability among current research make it challenging to reach a definitive conclusion about application, target populations, and overall effectiveness.

Use of Injections and Biologics for the Nonoperative Treatment of Rotator Cuff Pathology.

Symptomatic rotator cuff pathology is a common musculoskeletal issue with evolving surgical indications. Most of the patients undergo some form of nonoperative treatment before considering surgical intervention. Understanding and optimizing nonoperative treatment modalities is an essential key to successful treatment. This article contains a review of the current literature regarding the risks, benefits, and alternatives of the most common injections used in the treatment of rotator cuff pathology. Injection options covered include corticosteroids, biologics including platelet-rich plasma and stem cells, hyaluronic acid, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

In-Office Diagnostic Needle Arthroscopy Using the NanoScope™ Arthroscopy System.

Diagnostic needle arthroscopy performed in office is a safe and cost-effective method for accurate evaluation of intra-articular pathology, improving clinical decision making. This minimally invasive approach is an effective alternative to traditional diagnostic techniques of diagnostic surgical arthroscopy and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Needle arthroscopy is considered low-risk, with an extremely low complication rate when performed with appropriate technique and indications. The purpose of this article is to describe an approach to an in-office diagnostic procedure using a needle arthroscopy system.

Sex-Based Differences in Adult ACL Reconstruction Outcomes.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In the setting of ever improving outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, both objectively and subjectively, there remains continued interest in better understanding the differences in outcomes between male and female patients. The current review investigates the recent literature surrounding the roles of biological sex in adult ACL reconstruction outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: Within the past five years, the most prominent and recurrent difference between male and female patient cohorts is the subjective report of pain and function. Female patients have been consistently shown to have worse self-reported outcomes following ACL reconstruction. Specific and quantifiable subjective outcomes that are highlighted include the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS). Current research on the topic of biological sex-based differences in ACL reconstruction outcomes can be divided into four main categories: patient-reported subjective outcomes; physical assessment and gait analysis; kinematics; and rates of reinjury, revision, and contralateral reconstruction. This chapter provides a summary of recent literature focused on these four main areas of interest related to ACL reconstruction outcomes in males and females.

SpeedBridge Knotless Double-Pulley Rotator Cuff Repair.

Rotator cuff tears remain a common injury, and may require rotator cuff repair, one of the most frequently performed orthopaedic procedures. Achieving an ideal construct during rotator cuff repair is crucial, and while many techniques exist to accomplish this, they are continuously evolving to improve stability and biomechanics of the repaired shoulder. Improving efficiency of the procedure alongside the increasing complexity of innovative techniques remains of the utmost importance. The double-pulley SpeedBridge technique achieves medial fixation in a double-row, transosseus-equivalent repair, and the knotless nature of the technique creates for a low-profile construct and improves overall efficiency. The purpose of this Technical Note is to describe a reproducible and efficient approach to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using the SpeedBridge knotless double-pulley technique.

Incidence and Prevention of Thromboembolic Complications for Sports and Arthroscopic-related Surgery: Evidence-based Recommendations.

The incidence of thromboembolic events following arthroscopic surgery is relatively rare. Despite this, these are important complications to be aware of, as arthroscopic procedures are performed in high frequency each year and can lead to a substantial burden within health care. Over the past several decades, pharmacologic antithrombotic prevention strategies following knee arthroscopy have been extensively studied; however, their efficacy remains controversial, and there is a lack of consensus regarding a standard prevention protocol, with the exception of the established benefits of early mobilization. Several surgical and medical risk factors have been established and are important to consider as they specifically relate to each individual patient's risk of thromboembolic disease. Based on the best available evidence, chemical thromboprophylaxis appears to be unnecessary among healthy patients but may be beneficial for higher risk patients, especially those with a prior history of venous thromboembolism. A standard screening tool for risk factors in arthroscopy patients may be a cost-effective and safe solution for implementing preventative efforts.

Anterior cruciate ligament injury prevention.

Anterior cruciate ligament injuries are a prominent issue in the field of sports medicine, especially for the female athlete. Extensive research has been performed that acknowledges the disparity in anterior cruciate ligament injury rates between male and female athletes and the high prevalence of risk factors specific to females. The underlying causes of anterior cruciate ligament injuries are widespread and are important to consider when approaching injury prevention. For example, prevention techniques aim to correct neuromuscular imbalances and improve biomechanical deficits, which are some of the most significant risk factors leading to these injuries. While there is a lack of opportunity for intervention related to anatomical and hormonal risks, awareness of their influence on injury mechanisms remains an important factor in clinical decision-making. In pursuit of addressing the risks of this injury, several prevention programs have been established that have been shown to successfully reduce anterior cruciate ligament injury rates when properly executed. The most effective programs include early intervention with continuous training and are multicomponent programs including various targeted exercises to modify associated risk factors. Unfortunately, despite the development of these readily available programs, anterior cruciate ligament injury rates remain high due to insufficient implementation of these methods. Recognizing the efficacy and feasibility of utilizing prevention strategies and continuing to develop effective techniques remain of utmost importance to reduce the incidence of this substantial injury among athletes.