[Prediction of functional decline in elderly patients discharged from the accident and emergency department]. / Predictie van functionele achteruitgang bij ambulante geriatrische patiënten op de spoedgevallendienst.

AIM: The aim of this study is to investigate the predictive validity of 5 screening tools with respect to functional decline in older persons discharged from the Accident & Emergency Department. METHODS: The Identification of Seniors at Risk (ISAR), Triage Risk Screening Tool (TRST), questionnaire of Runciman, questionnaire of Rowland and the Voorlopige Indicator voor Plaatsing (VIP) were collected in 83 older persons discharged from the Emergency Department of the University Hospitals of Leuven. Functional decline was derived from the Katz-scale, reflecting the condition 14 days before admission, at admission, 14, 30 and 90 days after discharge. RESULTS: The screening tools with the highest sensitivity and negative predictive value at 14 days after discharge were the questionnaire of Rowland and the ISAR. Thirty and ninety days after discharge, the ISAR was most sensitive and predictive. CONCLUSION: Sensitivity and negative predictive value are the most important parameters for screening tools. Hence, our study suggests that the ISAR instrument is the most appropriate instrument to predict functional decline in ambulatory older persons admitted to the emergency department. The ISAR can easily be integrated in nursing records and can be systematically employed in older persons at the emergency department.

Process evaluation of a nurse-led multifactorial intervention protocol for risk screening and assessment of fall problems among community-dwelling older persons: a pilot-study.

This pilot study investigated the feasibility of a nurse-led fall prevention strategy in community-dwelling older persons. The sample included 126 subjects (mean age = 76 years) who could rise from a chair and transfer independently. During a home visit, a research nurse identified individuals at risk: a history of >or= 2 falls in the previous year or difficulties in gait and/or balance. Patients not at risk received an educational leaflet. Older persons at risk received an evaluation of risk factors for falling. Whenever problems were identified, the nurses gave specific advice and subjects were referred to their general practitioner (GP). After one month, adherence to these recommendations was evaluated. Twenty-seven individuals showed an increased risk of falling (21.4%). The mean number of risk factors per person was 3.4 (SD=1.2). Noncompliance with one or more of the fall prevention recommendations was 58.3%. Differentiated by type of recommendations, a high degree of compliance was observed for recommendations related to gait and balance, use of medication, orthostatic hypotension, urge-incontinence, environment and behavior (81.8%-100%). While most individuals followed the recommendation to consult their GP (66.7%-80%), most of the GP's failed to propose any further measures to prevent falls. Screening, evaluation of risk factors, giving advice and follow-up required on average 3.1 (SD=0.8), 29.4 (SD=15.1), 15.8 (SD=11.0) and 13.1 (SD=3.9) minutes, respectively. Of those subjects who were not at risk, 76.1% had read the leaflet and 74.6% of those considered it useful. This study provides preliminary evidence for the feasibility in terms of time investment to integrate a nurse-led multifactorial fall intervention in current care for older persons living at home. However, further investigation to increase compliance with recommendations and more insight in the GP's role relating to the management of patients at risk for falls is needed.