Royal College of Ophthalmologists' National Ophthalmology Database study of cataract surgery: report 11, techniques and complications of local anesthesia for cataract surgery in the United Kingdom.

PURPOSE: To describe variation in local anesthesia techniques and complications over a 10-year period for cataract surgery in the United Kingdom. SETTING: Reporting centers to the Royal College of Ophthalmologists (RCOphth) National Ophthalmology Database (NOD). DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional register-based study. METHODS: Data from the RCOphth NOD were used. Eligible for analysis were 1 195 882 cataract operations performed using local anesthesia between April 1, 2010, and March 31, 2020, in 80 centers. RESULTS: Overall, topical anesthesia alone was used in 152 321 operations (12.7%), combined topical and intracameral in 522 849 (43.7%), sub-Tenon in 461 175 (38.6%), and peribulbar/retrobulbar in 59 537 (5.0%). In National Health Service (NHS) institutions, 48.3% of operations were topical with/without intracameral vs 88.7% in independent sector treatment centers (ISTCs). 45.9% were sub-Tenon in NHS vs 9.6% in ISTCs. 5.8% were peribulbar/retrobulbar in NHS vs 1.7% in ISTCs. Anesthetic complication rates decreased from 2.7% in the 2010 NHS year to 1.5% in the 2019 NHS year (overall, 2.1% for NHS; 0.2% for ISTCs). Overall anesthetic complication rates were 0.3%, 0.3%, 3.5%, and 3.1% for topical alone, combined topical/intracameral, sub-Tenon, and peribulbar/retrobulbar, respectively. Complication rates were higher for sharp-needle anesthesia (peribulbar/retrobulbar) in patients taking warfarin rather than direct oral anticoagulants (4.8% vs 3.1%; P = .024). Considerable variation was observed between centers on anesthetic choices and anesthetic complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: Combined topical and intracameral is the most common choice of anesthesia for cataract surgery in the United Kingdom and is associated with lower anesthetic-related complication rates than sub-Tenon and peribulbar/retrobulbar anesthesia. Variation in the anesthetic choice exists between centers and between NHS and ISTC sectors.

The Royal College of Ophthalmologists' National Ophthalmology Database Study of Cataract Surgery: Report 12, Risk factors for suprachoroidal haemorrhage during cataract surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To establish the incidence of acute intraoperative suprachoroidal haemorrhage (AISH) during cataract surgery and identify the risk factors for this complication. METHODS: Data from the Royal College of Ophthalmologists' National Ophthalmology Database was analysed. During the 11-year study period, from 01/04/2010 to 31/03/2021, 709 083 operations performed on 498 170 patients from 65 centres were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS: AISH occurred in 0.03% (204/709 083, approximately 1 in 3 500) of eligible cataract operations performed during the study period. Posterior capsule rupture was the risk factor most strongly associated with AISH (OR: 17.6, 95% CI: 12.4-24.9, p < 0.001). Other ocular risk factors identified were raised intraocular pressure (IOP) preoperatively (OR: 3.7, 95% CI: 2.5-5.5, p < 0.001), glaucoma (OR: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.2-2.4, p = 0.004). Risk increased with age and patients aged over 90 years were at greatest risk (OR: 6.7, 95% CI: 3.5-12.8, p < 0.001). The addition of intracameral anaesthetic when performing surgery under topical anaesthetic appears to be protective (OR: 0.5, 95% CI: 0.3-0.8, p = 0.003), compared to topical anaesthetic alone. There was a 16-fold increase in the incidence of vision loss when AISH occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of AISH during modern cataract surgery is approximately 1 in 3 500 and is associated with a significant increase in the risk of vision loss should it occur. Posterior capsule rupture is the risk factor most strongly associated with AISH. Preoperative IOP control is a modifiable risk factor. The use of intracameral anaesthesia may reduce the risk of AISH.

Preventing venous thrombosis in critically ill children: what is the right approach?

BACKGROUND: The incidence of venous thromboembolic (VTE) events in children has increased in recent years (J Neurosurg, 101, 2004, 32; J Thromb Haemost, 1, 2003, 1443) yet there is currently no consensus as to what VTE prophylaxis, if any, should be applied to the pediatric population. OBJECTIVES/AIMS: Our aim was to audit current practice in pediatric VTE prophylaxis across England and Wales and to advocate simple measures for prevention. We illustrate the importance of the condition with a series of cases from the South West Paediatric Burns and Neurosurgical Services based in Bristol. METHODS: Every pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and burns center admitting children in England and Wales was invited to participate in a structured telephone questionnaire designed to find out how VTE in children were being prevented. We performed a literature review of specific risk factors and management of these factors. RESULTS: Only one of the 24 units surveyed had written guidelines specific for children. Four other units used modified adult guidelines in older children. In the remaining 19 units that had no written guidelines, decisions regarding prophylaxis were based on individual cases and consultant-led. CONCLUSION: There is no consensus in England and Wales as to which VTE prophylactic measures should be applied in patients <18 years of age. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines apply to adults only. Given the rarity of VTE events in children, it is unlikely that randomized controlled trials will provide the answer. We therefore propose that simple empirical measures be formally implemented in critically ill children to reduce the risk of developing this important but under-recognized condition.