Clinical presentation, processes and outcomes of care for patients with pneumococcal pneumonia.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the presentation, resolution of symptoms, processes of care, and outcomes of pneumococcal pneumonia, and to compare features of the bacteremic and nonbacteremic forms of this illness. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study. SETTING: Five medical institutions in 3 geographic locations. PARTICIPANTS: Inpatients and outpatients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). MEASUREMENTS: Sociodemographic characteristics, respiratory and nonrespiratory symptoms, and physical examination findings were obtained from interviews or chart review. Severity of illness was assessed using a validated prediction rule for short-term mortality in CAP. Pneumococcal pneumonia was categorized as bacteremic; nonbacteremic, pure etiology; or nonbacteremic, mixed etiology. MAIN RESULTS: One hundred fifty-eight (6.9%) of 2,287 patients (944 outpatients, 1,343 inpatients) with CAP had pneumococcal pneumonia. Sixty-five (41%) of the 158 with pneumococcal pneumonia were bacteremic; 74 (47%) were nonbacteremic with S. pneumoniae as sole pathogen; and 19 (12%) were nonbacteremic with S. pneumoniae as one of multiple pathogens. The pneumococcal bacteremia rate for outpatients was 2.6% and for inpatients it was 6.6%. Cough, dyspnea, and pleuritic pain were common respiratory symptoms. Hemoptysis occurred in 16% to 22% of the patients. A large number of nonrespiratory symptoms were noted. Bacteremic patients were less likely than nonbacteremic patients to have sputum production and myalgias (60% vs 82% and 33% vs 57%, respectively; P <.01 for both), more likely to have elevated blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine levels, and more likely to receive penicillin therapy. Half of bacteremic patients were in the low risk category for short-term mortality (groups I to III), similar to the nonbacteremic patients. None of the 32 bacteremic patients in risk groups I to III died, while 7 of 23 (30%) in risk group V died. Intensive care unit admissions and pneumonia-related mortality were similar between bacteremic and nonbacteremic groups, although 46% of the bacteremic group had respiratory failure compared with 32% and 37% for the other groups. The nonbacteremic pure etiology patients returned to household activities faster than bacteremic patients. Symptoms frequently persisted at 30 days: cough (50%); dyspnea (53%); sputum production (48%); pleuritic pain (13%); and fatigue (63%). CONCLUSIONS: There were few differences in the presentation of bacteremic and nonbacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia. About half of bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia patients were at low risk for mortality. Symptom resolution frequently was slow.

Last-minute preoperative cardiology consultations: epidemiology and impact.

To identify clinical predictors of last-minute preoperative cardiology consultations and to evaluate the impact of these consultations on patient care, we performed a retrospective case-control study including all 166 patients who received unscheduled cardiology consultations at the preadmission testing center (PATC) of an urban teaching hospital. Control subjects were 166 patients matched by date and category of surgical procedure. Significant (p < 0.05) independent predictors of last-minute consultations included history of myocardial infarction (odds ratio [OR] = 23.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.5 to 373), history of chest pain (OR = 15.3; 95% CI = 3.7 to 62.9), history of chronic obstructive lung disease (OR = 5.9; 95% CI = 1.1 to 32.9), prior echocardiography (OR = 3.4; 95% CI = 1.2 to 9.8), and age (OR per decade = 1.1; 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.1). Thus among patients undergoing elective noncardiac surgery, last-minute preoperative consultations are common and are usually precipitated by an abnormal electrocardiogram or history of cardiovascular disease. Last-minute consultations may be preventable if those patients with risk factors for consultation are identified in advance of the preadmission evaluation and referred for elective consultation.

Practice guidelines and malpractice litigation: a two-way street.

OBJECTIVE: To understand how practice guidelines are used in malpractice litigation. DESIGN: Review of the open and closed malpractice claims of two medical malpractice insurance companies, and a mailed survey of attorneys who litigate malpractice claims. SETTING: United States. PARTICIPANTS: Two insurance companies and 960 randomly selected malpractice attorneys. MEASUREMENTS: Frequency and nature of the use of practice guidelines in litigation; understanding and frequency of the use of practice guidelines by attorneys in malpractice cases. RESULTS: 259 claims opened in 1990-1992 at two insurance companies, including all obstetrics and anesthesia claims and a random sample of other claims, were reviewed. Seventeen of these claims involved practice guidelines, which were used as exculpatory evidence (exonerating the defendant physician) in 4 cases and as inculpatory evidence (implicating the defendant physician) in 12 cases. The only physician or patient factors associated with use of a guideline was a longer physician-patient relationship (P = 0.021). Nine hundred and sixty surveys were mailed and 578 were returned (response rate, 60.1%). Attorneys reported that once a suit is initiated, practice guidelines are likely to be used for inculpatory purposes (inculpatory in 54% of cases; exculpatory in 22.7% of cases). However, guidelines that seem to offer exculpatory value induce attorneys not to bring suits. The only attorney factor associated with increased use of guidelines was a practice in which more than 50% of business was in medical malpractice. CONCLUSIONS: Guidelines are used both by plaintiffs' and defendants' attorneys in malpractice cases. The emphasis in health reform proposals on guidelines as exculpatory evidence should be carefully considered.