Age-Friendly Health Systems 4Ms: Implementing Medication Management in Hamad Medical Corporation, Qatar.

PURPOSE: To implement the Age-Friendly Health Systems (AFHS) 4Ms framework, focusing on Medication and its impact on Mobility, Mentation, and What Matters, within Hamad Medical Corporation in Qatar. METHOD: A quality improvement approach was used to implement, extend, and sustain the AFHS 4Ms framework at Hamad Medical Corporation. The Medication "M" was described as the use case to illustrate the impact of high-risk medications on Mobility, Mentation, and What Matters, using an evidence-based, interdisciplinary approach. RESULTS: Implementation of the AFHS 4Ms framework revealed success in aligning multidisciplinary teams to prioritize patient-centered care and caregiver engagement. Through this collaboration, a process map, modified medication screening tool, documentation templates, and educational efforts were developed. CONCLUSION: Applying the AFHS 4Ms framework into health care settings is crucial to improve the care of older adults. Medication management is a cornerstone, involving interdisciplinary team input during screening and act phases to ensure proper medication prescribing and use in older adults. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 50(6), 6-9.].

Navigating Disease-Modifying Treatments for Alzheimer's Disease: Focusing on Medications in Phase 3 Clinical Trials.

Over the past 18 months, there has been scrutiny and controversy over the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's accelerated approval of aducanumab, a novel monoclonal antibody to treat Alzheimer's disease and prevent disease progression. As clinicians, educators, and advocates for our patients and caregivers impacted daily by this debilitating illness, this approval reinforces the need to maintain vigilance and awareness about emerging agents. The intent of the current article is to highlight some of the medications in Phase 3 clinical trials and share resources and updates on disease-modifying agents and their unique pharmacology. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 49(1), 6-10.].

Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors: Risks vs. Rewards When Caring for Older Adults.

Managing multiple comorbidities is common in older adults. Thus, when a medication class, such as sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, can potentially treat multiple conditions and prevent progression of chronic kidney disease, multiple guidelines must be followed when using these agents. The current article discusses risks and benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors, especially in the context of new evidence, and presents a case example. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 48(10), 7-13.].

Interprofessional Education and Older Adults in the Shared Virtual Classroom: Lessons Learned During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The current article provides an overview of an interprofessional service-learning course that became virtual in the setting of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Telehealth video technologies were used to build an intergenerational, virtual classroom and increase engagement of older adults with interdisciplinary health professional students. The virtual classroom involved group health education sessions, individualized Medicare wellness visits, and a clinical huddle. The course addressed the public health need for reliable health information during the early days of the pandemic, social connection, and meeting the educational goals for health care students and older adults in a novel virtual setting. Lessons learned for the interdisciplinary team and for engaging older adults included the need for preparation reading, team building exercises, training videos, and telehealth competency checklists. Beyond the pandemic, adoption of virtual methods enables hybrid approaches to interprofessional education and builds competencies for delivery of telehealth and computer-based visits in professional practice settings. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 48(8), 52-56.].

Evolution of the Comprehensive Medication Review Completion Rate for Medicare Part D Plans: What Do the Stars Tell Us?

Objective To describe changes in the Medicare Part D Comprehensive Medication Review (CMR) completion rate within the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Star Ratings program since its inception. Methods Publicly available information for Star Ratings years 2014 to 2021 was obtained from the CMS website and through indexed literature and internet searches. Data elements for the CMR completion measure were extracted for Medicare Advantage prescription drug plans (MA-PDs) and prescription drug plans (PDPs) and included the annual weighted value, cut-points for star rating, completion rates, and star achievement. Results In 2014 and 2015, the CMR completion rate was a display measure in the Star Ratings program with rates between 10 and 16%. This measure was added in 2016 with a weighted value of 1 that has remained the same. The cut-points when comparing 2016 with 2021 have increased from less than 13.6 to less than 48% for 1 star and 76 to 89% or more for 5 stars for MA-PDs and from less than 8.5 to less than 24% for 1 star and 36.7 to 61% or more for 5 stars for PDPs. From 2016 to 2021, the average Star Ratings for CMR completion increased from 2.3 to 3.7 for MA-PDs and 2.3 to 3.6 for PDPs. Conclusion Since the inception of the CMR completion rate as a quality measure, an increasing proportion of eligible beneficiaries has received a CMR with MA-PDs consistently providing this service to more beneficiaries than PDPs. The cut-points for star achievement have also risen, requiring higher CMR completion rates to achieve higher star ratings. Further evolution of the CMR quality measure is needed for improving medication management.

Senior Care Pharmacists, Audiologists, and Otologists: Improving Hearing Health for Older Patients Through Interprofessional Collaboration.

The purpose of this manuscript is to provide pharmacists with education on hearing loss that colleagues in audiology believe is most critical for pharmacists. As well as highlighting insightful interventions pharmacists can make in collaboration with hearing professionals, such as audiologists, otolaryngologists, and otologists, to improve patient care. This project was initiated by professional students at the University of Maryland in both Baltimore and College Park campuses, after completing the interprofessional elective course IPE Care in Geriatrics. Upon completion of the course, the authors performed an extensive literature search and reviewed publications pertaining to pharmacy, audiology, and their integration.Hearing loss can have a significant impact on a patient's quality of life. Older people are at an increased risk for experiencing hearing impairment, but often do not seek help from health care providers. Collaboration between audiologists, otolaryngologists, and pharmacists has the potential to improve patients' access to hearing health and break barriers for patients. Important interventions that pharmacists can make to better serve their patients with hearing loss include screening, enhancing communication, and hearing aid assistance. This article also provides guidance on identifying patients who would be candidates for over-the-counter hearing aids and patients who should be referred to a hearing professional. This skill will become increasingly relevant with the emergence of over-the-counter hearing aids.

Opioid Use Disorder and Older Adults: Navigating Treatment Options.

The intent of the current article is to highlight via a case vignette challenges faced when managing pain across care transitions in an older adult with multiple comorbidities, including, but not limited to, opioid use disorder (OUD). This case will highlight the role of different medications for OUD, namely buprenorphine/naloxone, methadone, and naltrexone. Furthermore, the case illustrates medication-related considerations in addition to action steps that are needed when working with older adults. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 48(7), 4-9.].

Challenges and Successes of Global Deprescribing Networks: A Qualitative Key Informant Study.

The landscape of deprescribing has been rapidly evolving and expanding globally with the formation of regional and national deprescribing networks. The work of these networks is primarily focused on older adults and high-risk medications. The purpose of the current qualitative study is to describe successes and challenges of deprescribing from thought-leaders across the world. Fourteen key informant interviews were conducted from various disciplines, levels of experiences, and regions around the globe. From the interviews, six major themes across two domains were identified: (a) network structure, (b) public perception, (c) policy implications, (d) implementation, (e) challenges, and (f) recommendations. These domains, themes, and insight provided by deprescribing leaders contribute to the advancement of deprescribing networks as global efforts continue to focus on optimizing medication management. Collaboration among interprofessional team members will be critical to the expansion as well as sustainability of this important work. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 48(1), 7-14.].

Medication Safety in Older Adults: Learning From 2020 as We Launch into 2021.

In health care, the year 2020 is marked by the ongoing coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, with much research published to clarify infection risk, treatment approaches, and proposed interventions to reduce spread and combat complications. Although much work focused on COVID-19, medication safety remains a priority, and studies on adverse drug reactions, high-risk medications, and approaches to mitigate risk associated with chronic medication use, such as inappropriate dosing in hospital settings, were published. A continued commitment to patient-centered care, such as the approach put forth by the Age-Friendly Health Systems initiative and telehealth initiatives, ensures that even as health care practice strives to meet the challenge of an unprecedented global pandemic, safe medication use informed by patient needs continues to guide best practices through lessons learned. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 47(1), 7-11.].

Understanding the Socioeconomic and Geographical Characteristics of Beneficiaries Receiving a Comprehensive Medication Review.

BACKGROUND: Medicare Part D sponsors are required to offer medication therapy management (MTM) programs to eligible beneficiaries. Recent studies have demonstrated that there have been racial/ethnic disparities in MTM eligibility criteria. For example, compared with non-Hispanic White beneficiaries, Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black beneficiaries are less likely to be eligible for MTM. However, there is limited evidence for socioeconomic and geographical characteristics of those who are eligible and receive MTM services. OBJECTIVE: To describe the demographic, socioeconomic, and geographic characteristics of Medicare beneficiaries who received MTM services. METHODS: As part of a previous study, a national survey evaluated a convenience sample of perspectives of Medicare beneficiaries on the MTM standardized format. The survey was distributed through Medicare Part D plans to beneficiaries receiving MTM services from 2017-2018. As part of the survey, respondents could provide their ZIP codes. Geographical variables, such as the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) urban-rural classification scheme and economic research service (ERS) county typology codes, were then applied to respondents' ZIP codes, allowing for the classification of counties or census tracts by urbanization and economic dependence measures. Descriptive statistics are reported for demographic, geographical, and socioeconomic information. RESULTS: Of the 300 (of 434) respondents who provided their ZIP codes, 51.3% were aged 65-74 years; 50% were male; and 66.7% had at least a college education. There were 82.7% who self-identified as White, while only 8% self-identified as Hispanic or Black/African American. The majority of respondents (58.4%) lived in large metropolitan areas as defined by the NCHS urban-rural classification scheme. Respondents' counties were characterized by economic dependence with 14.0% of respondents living in federal/state government-dependent counties and 12.7% living in recreation-dependent counties. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of respondents who provided their ZIP codes identified themselves as White and lived in large metropolitan areas. Respondents who identified themselves as Hispanic or Black/African American were not well represented. This study provides geographical and socioeconomic characteristics of Medicare beneficiaries who received MTM services and highlights racial/ethnic differences. Further work is needed to confirm geographical and socioeconomic disparities among beneficiaries who received MTM services. DISCLOSURES: No outside funding supported this study. Pellegrin is a member of the AMCP MTM Advisory Group. The other authors have nothing to disclose.

Improving Medication Management by Understanding Patient and Caregiver Preferences for Medication Packaging.

OBJECTIVE: To assess older adults' perceptions and preferences when comparing multi-medication packaging products.
DESIGN: Qualitative study involving focus group interviews (FGIs) and key informant interviews (KIIs).
SETTING: Interviews were conducted in multiple cities within the United States during June-July 2019.
PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: FGI participants (N=36) included community dwelling adults, 65 years of age or older, who took 5+ chronic medications, or their caregivers. KII participants (N=15) included health care professionals caring for similar populations.
INTERVENTIONS: Participants were given samples of blister packs and pouches and asked about medication management and appearance and usability of medication packaging. Interviews were audio-recorded with participants' consent, then transcribed and coded using Atlas. ti. Recurrent and emergent themes were identified, and selected quotes served as examples of identified themes.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Participants' perceptions regarding medication packaging.
RESULTS: Participants' preferences varied for different multi-medication packaging systems. Similarly, most FGI participants did not communicate a strong attitude for or against their existing management systems. However, many FGI participants perceived a need for larger font size than seen on the either of the multimedication packaging samples. KII participants also preferred a larger font size on both packagings. KII participants thought the blister packs offered better visual organization and enabled caregivers to quickly assess adherence. However, KII participants expressed concern about integrating as-needed and short-term use medications and noted difficulty opening both types of packages.
CONCLUSION: Visual appearance is important to both patients and health care providers. Continued research in this area is vital for tailoring packaging types and technology to patients.

Update on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Older Adults.

In 2020, the American Diabetes Association released an update to their standards of care guideline, which included special considerations for older adults. Care of older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus needs to be individualized and incorporate patient preferences. Guideline updates provide specific goals for older adults based on their ability to perform activities of daily living, comorbidities, and health prognosis. The current article aims to illustrate updates through an older adult case and key medication-related considerations. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 46(4), 7-12.].

Students' perceptions of interprofessional education in geriatrics: A qualitative analysis.

Interprofessional education (IPE) is critical for ensuring that students are prepared to collaborate with team members across disciplines once they enter clinical practice; particularly, in the complex care of the geriatric population. This qualitative study explored the experiences of interdisciplinary students in a clinical based IPE experience at a senior housing residence. Reflective journals were examined from students (n = 23) in nursing, social work, pharmacy, and medicine participating in an IPE program. Four core themes emerged in the analysis: exposure to geriatrics, IPE advantages for students, IPE advantages for older adults, and IPE challenges. Findings from this study confirmed advantages of IPE in a real-world clinical setting in terms of students learning the value and scope of practice of interdisciplinary team members. The exposure to geriatrics helped students to gain an in-depth understanding of issues affecting older adults in the community and increase professional confidence in their future clinical practice.

Patient and Provider Perspectives on Deprescribing Proton Pump Inhibitors.

The aim of the current study is to describe proton pump inhibitor (PPI) prescribing trends in an older adult population and elucidate perspectives regarding PPI deprescribing. A retrospective chart review and a prospective cross-sectional analysis of provider and patient surveys were conducted. The retrospective chart review identified 107 patients age ≥65 who were prescribed PPI therapy. Nineteen patients on PPI therapy and 74 providers completed surveys regarding their perspectives on PPI deprescribing. PPI therapy was potentially inappropriate for 66% of patients based on dose, duration, and/or indication. Provider barriers to deprescribing included fear of outcomes, access to documentation, and uncertainty of current guidelines. This study illustrates the prevalence of long-term PPI use in geriatric patients without associated clinical indications, as well as perceived barriers to deprescribing. Long-term PPI use is associated with significant side effects; therefore, successful deprescribing must address these perceived barriers. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 45(10), 9-17.].

Online Provision of Part D Medication Therapy Management Program Information.

BACKGROUND: Low rates of beneficiary participation in medication therapy management (MTM) programs may be partly due to lack of awareness and understanding of the MTM program. To address this, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) requires Medicare Part D sponsors to provide online information about their MTM programs. An early study conducted in 2014 found low compliance rates, with only 59.5% of a small convenience sample of Part D plan contract websites compliant with CMS requirements. The current study provides a more recent evaluation of compliance with website requirements using a random sample of Part D plan contracts. OBJECTIVES: To (a) evaluate Part D sponsors' compliance with MTM program website elements that are required and suggested by CMS and (b) investigate the use of elements recommended by the National Institute on Aging (NIA) for websites for older adults. METHODS: A random sample of 184 Part D plan contract MTM program websites was selected from a list of 624 approved Part D plan contracts for 2016. Duplicate and inaccessible websites were excluded. The remaining websites were reviewed to determine compliance with CMS-required, CMS-suggested, and NIA-recommended elements. Descriptive statistics were reported at the Part D contract level for compliance with individual elements, category elements (CMS-required, CMS-suggested, and NIA-recommended), and overall compliance. Overall compliance by category was also reported by Part D plan type. RESULTS: Of the 184 MTM websites that were reviewed, 106 remained after excluding duplicate (n = 67) and inaccessible (n = 11) websites: 81 from Medicare Advantage prescription drug (MAPD) plans, 16 from prescription drug plans (PDPs), and 9 from Medicare-Medicaid plans (MMPs). Overall, 51% of Part D plan contract MTM websites were compliant with all of the 14 CMS-required elements. The only element in the CMS-suggested elements category, "accessibility by clicking through a maximum of two links," had a compliance rate of 79%. For the NIA-recommended elements category, 46% of the Part D plan contract MTM websites were compliant with the 4 elements. CONCLUSIONS: Medicare Part D plan sponsors are providing information about their MTM programs on plan websites. However, only 51% of Part D plan websites are fully compliant with CMS guidance, providing all required elements. DISCLOSURES: No outside funding supported this study. The authors have no financial or other relationships to disclose. The original research on a small and nonrandom sample of Part D plan contracts was presented during AMCP Nexus 2014; October 7-10, 2014; in Boston, MA. The results presented here are a larger and random sample of Part D plan contracts.

Beneficiary, Caregiver, and Case Manager Perspectives on the Medication Therapy Management Program Standardized Format.

Plan sponsors of Medicare Part D must provide beneficiaries who receive a comprehensive medication review (CMR) with a written summary using the Medicare Part D Medication Therapy Management Standardized Format (SF). The SF is a means to advance consistency in the CMR program by providing a template of expected content. However, barriers remain with beneficiary use and integration into existing electronic health records. The current study assessed Medicare beneficiary, caregiver, and case manager perceptions of the SF through five focus group interviews with a total of 23 participants. Qualitative analysis found that beneficiaries and case managers preferred a consolidated SF document to share and update their entire health care team. Beneficiaries suggested adding information to the SF on dosage, timing, drug interactions, cost, and less expensive alternatives. Identifying elements of the SF that are perceived as useful to beneficiaries will allow for a more streamlined SF that may enhance interoperability among the health care team. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 45(4), 7-13.].

Findings from a National Survey of Medicare Beneficiary Perspectives on the Medicare Part D Medication Therapy Management Standardized Format.

BACKGROUND: The Medication Therapy Management (MTM) Program Standardized Format (SF) is a written summary of a comprehensive medication review (CMR) that must be provided to Medicare Part D beneficiaries. Concerns have been raised regarding the number of pages of the SF, mailing costs, the static nature of the document, and the lack of integration into beneficiaries' electronic health records. To date, limited research exists on beneficiaries' perceptions of the SF. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the perspectives of beneficiaries regarding the utility of the SF to inform potential modifications for optimal use. METHODS: An online survey, designed based on the standard approach to measuring patient satisfaction with health service attributes and previous qualitative research, was distributed through Medicare Part D plans to beneficiaries who had received a CMR in the past year. Survey distribution began July 1, 2018, and data collection ended on October 31, 2018. Descriptive statistics are reported for demographic information; health status; perceived value and helpfulness of the SF and its 3 components (cover letter, medication action plan [MAP], personal medication list [PML]); updates to the SF; alternate formatting; and integration of the SF into health records. RESULTS: A total of 9,975 surveys were sent electronically by 4 Medicare Part D plans to beneficiaries who had received a CMR in the past year. Of the 434 unduplicated survey respondents (response rate of 4.3%), 58.5% were aged 65 to 84 years; 60% identified themselves as white; and 49.1% had at least a college education. The most commonly reported comorbidities were diabetes (50.5%) and high cholesterol (43.1%), with 10.7% of respondents rating their health as "very good" or "excellent" and 27.4% choosing "poor" or "fair." Beneficiaries rated how well the SF helped improve different aspects of their medication management (e.g., solving medication-related problems, keeping track of medications, correctly using medications, and understanding why medications are being taken), with 40.8%-44.9% choosing "very good" to "excellent" for each aspect. Helpful sections included "What we talked about" and "What I need to do"for the MAP, and medication name, strength, dosage form, and "How and why I use the medication" for the PML. Less helpful were the fill-in sections of the MAP, with 48.6% reporting that they did not write in any information. In contrast, 44.7% of the participants noted that they updated their PML. A wallet card version of the PML, if available, would be used by 54.6% of participants. About one third of Medicare beneficiaries shared the SF with their doctor, and 26% of the participants gave copies of their medication summary to their relatives. CONCLUSIONS: Fewer than half of the respondents perceived the SF as very good or excellent in helping them to manage their medications. This national survey provides Medicare beneficiary-focused evidence that more work is needed to improve the usability and portability of the SF. This can be achieved by allowing flexibility in the design of the SF, while including essential elements. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP), which provided a grant to the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy to conduct this study. Carden and Kumbera are AMCP employees. Brandt reports a grant from IMPAQ and consulting fees from Rand, outside of this study. Pellegrin is a member of the AMCP MTM Advisory Board. The other authors have nothing to disclose.

Combating Polypharmacy Through Deprescribing Potentially Inappropriate Medications.

Polypharmacy, defined as the use of five or more medications, is becoming increasingly prevalent in older adults throughout the United States. Depre-scribing, along with the use of existing tools, such as the American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria, can help guide health care providers in reducing the risks associated with polypharmacy such as side effects and drug interactions. The framework of deprescribing and the use of existing guidelines and resources are valuable in guiding health care providers in addressing polypharmacy. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 45(1), 9-15.].

How Consultant Pharmacists Gained Access to Maryland's Health Information Exchange.

The Chesapeake Regional Information System for our Patients (CRISP) is a health information exchange in Maryland that is designed to improve communication among members of the health care team including physicians, nurses, and other health professionals. Senior care pharmacists gained access to CRISP through successful collaborative efforts at both the state and national levels. This involved efforts to address medication-related problems that continue to be a concern during transitions of care, especially for older, vulnerable adults. Having access to recent clinical data assists the senior care pharmacist in providing medication therapy management services during transitions of care-the movement of a patient from one setting of care to another.This article highlights the importance of collaboration and advocacy between state and national leadership of the American Society of Consultant Pharmacists (ASCP) with key stakeholders to negotiate and gain access to such information for senior care pharmacists working in the post-acute and long-term care settings in Maryland.