Transitioning from development to commercial: risk-based guidance for critical materials management in cell therapies.

A key hurdle to ensuring patient access to cell and gene therapies (CGTs) and continued growth of the industry is the management of raw materials. The combination of rapid growth, individual product and process complexity and limited industry-specific guidance or awareness presents non-obvious risk mitigation challenges for transitioning from development to clinical application. Understanding, assessing and mitigating the varied raw material risks for CGT products during product and clinical development are critical for ensuring smooth transitions into commercialization and for preventing interruption of product supply to patients. This article presents a risk-based approach driven by concerns for patient safety that can help focus and coordinate efforts to address the most critical risk factors. Highlighted are some of the highest risk materials common to the manufacture of many CGTs, including the primary starting material, culture media, reagents and single-use components. Using a hypothetical gene-edited cell therapy as an example, we describe the general manufacturing process and subsequently incorporate the described methodology to perform a sample risk assessment. The practical approach described herein is intended to assist CGT manufacturers and suppliers in actively assessing materials early in development to provide a basic starting point for mitigating risks experienced when translating CGT products for clinical and long-term commercial application.

Concise Review: Process Development Considerations for Cell Therapy.

UNLABELLED: The development of robust and well-characterized methods of production of cell therapies has become increasingly important as therapies advance through clinical trials toward approval. A successful cell therapy will be a consistent, safe, and effective cell product, regardless of the cell type or application. Process development strategies can be developed to gain efficiency while maintaining or improving safety and quality profiles. This review presents an introduction to the process development challenges of cell therapies and describes some of the tools available to address production issues. This article will provide a summary of what should be considered to efficiently advance a cellular therapy from the research stage through clinical trials and finally toward commercialization. The identification of the basic questions that affect process development is summarized in the target product profile, and considerations for process optimization are discussed. The goal is to identify potential manufacturing concerns early in the process so they may be addressed effectively and thus increase the probability that a therapy will be successful. SIGNIFICANCE: The present study contributes to the field of cell therapy by providing a resource for those transitioning a potential therapy from the research stage to clinical and commercial applications. It provides the necessary steps that, when followed, can result in successful therapies from both a clinical and commercial perspective.

Concise review: guidance in developing commercializable autologous/patient-specific cell therapy manufacturing.

Cell therapy is poised to play an enormous role in regenerative medicine. However, little guidance is being made available to academic and industrial entities in the start-up phase. In this technical review, members of the International Society for Cell Therapy provide guidance in developing commercializable autologous and patient-specific manufacturing strategies from the perspective of process development. Special emphasis is placed on providing guidance to small academic or biotech researchers as to what simple questions can be addressed or answered at the bench in order to make their cell therapy products more feasible for commercial-scale production. We discuss the processes that are required for scale-out at the manufacturing level, and how many questions can be addressed at the bench level. The goal of this review is to provide guidance in the form of topics that can be addressed early in the process of development to better the chances of the product being successful for future commercialization.

Increased lymphocyte infiltration in patients with head and neck cancer treated with the IRX-2 immunotherapy regimen.

Twenty-seven subjects with squamous cell cancer of the head and neck received the neoadjuvant IRX-2 immunotherapy regimen prior to surgery in a Phase 2 trial. Pretreatment tumor biopsies were compared with the primary tumor surgical specimens for lymphocyte infiltration, necrosis and fibrosis, using hematoxylin and eosin stain and immunohistochemistry in 25 subjects. Sections were examined by three pathologists. Relative to pretreatment biopsies, increases in lymphocyte infiltration (LI) were seen using H and E or immunohistochemistry. CD3+ CD4+ T cells and CD20+ B cells were primarily found in the peritumoral stroma and CD3+ CD8+ T cells and CD68+ macrophages were mainly intratumoral. LI in the surgical specimens were associated with reductions in the primary tumor size. Improved survival at 5 years was correlated with high overall LI in the tumor specimens. Neoadjuvant IRX-2 immunotherapy regimen may restore immune responsiveness presumably by mobilizing tumor infiltrating effector lymphocytes and macrophages into the tumor.

Novel neoadjuvant immunotherapy regimen safety and survival in head and neck squamous cell cancer.

BACKGROUND: Cellular immune suppression is observed in head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) and contributes to poor prognosis. Restoration of immune homeostasis may require primary cell-derived cytokines at physiologic doses. An immunotherapy regimen containing a biologic, with multiple-active cytokine components, and administered with cytoxan, zinc, and indomethacin was developed to modulate cellular immunity. METHODS: Study methods were designed to determine the safety and efficacy of a 21-day neoadjuvant immunotherapy regimen in a phase 2 trial that enrolled 27 therapy-naïve patients with stage II to IVa HNSCC. Methods included safety, clinical and radiologic tumor response, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and tumor lymphocytic infiltrate (LI) data collection. RESULTS: Acute toxicity was minimal. Patients completed neoadjuvant treatment without surgical delay. By independent radiographic review, 83% had stable disease during treatment. OS was 92%, 73%, and 69% at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. Histologic analysis suggested correlation between survival and tumor LI. CONCLUSION: Immunotherapy regimen was tolerated. Survival results are encouraging.

A phase 1 safety study of an IRX-2 regimen in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

OBJECTIVES: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is associated with profound defects in cellular immunity. IRX-2, a primary cell-derived biologic containing multiple cytokines, has enhanced immune responses and induced tumor rejection in preclinical studies. This phase 1 open label study aimed to determine the clinical and laboratory safety of an IRX-2 regimen in patients with HNSCC. METHODS: Patients with HNSCC who had failed surgery and/or radiation therapy were enrolled. IRX-2 was injected subcutaneously at 115 units per dose, 2 doses/d over 10 days, starting on day 4. Patients received low-dose cyclophosphamide infusion on day 1 and took oral indomethacin and zinc daily from day 1 through day 21. Safety and laboratory assessments were undertaken throughout the treatment and 4 weeks after completion of the regimen. RESULTS: A total of 13 patients with advanced disease were enrolled in the safety/intent-to-treat population; all experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs). The most frequent AEs were blood and lymphatic disorders, followed by gastrointestinal disorders. Most AEs were mild to moderate in severity. Three patients discontinued the study due to an AE, including 2 deaths. Two patients died after the study period due to tumor progression. No death or discontinuation was considered related to the study drugs. Antitumor responses were noted by radiographic assessment. In the 8 patients who had antitumor data at day 21, 1 patient had complete response, 5 had stable disease, and 2 had progressive disease. CONCLUSIONS: The IRX-2 regimen was tolerated in patients with advanced HNSCC who failed surgery and/or radiation therapy. The safety and antitumor activity observed warrants further studies.

Mechanisms of T-cell protection from death by IRX-2: a new immunotherapeutic.

OBJECTIVES: IRX-2 is a novel immunotherapeutic containing physiologic quantities of several cytokines which protects human T lymphocytes from tumor-induced or drug-induced apoptosis. Here, we investigate the mechanisms responsible for IRX-2-mediated protection of T lymphocytes exposed to tumor-derived microvesicles (TMV). METHODS: Jurkat cells or primary human T cells ± IRX-2 were co-incubated with TMV and then examined by flow cytometry or Western blots for expression of molecules regulating cell survival (FLIP, Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, Mcl-1) or death (Fas, caspase 8, caspase 9, Bax, Bid). ANX V binding, caspase activation or cytochrome c release were also measured ± cycloheximide (CHX) or ± the Akt-specific inhibitor. Jurkat cells transfected with the cFLIP gene were used to evaluate the role of cFLIP in IRX-2-mediated protection. Effects of CHX on IRX-2-mediated protection and activation of NF-κB upon the TMV/IRX-2 treatment were also measured. RESULTS: IRX-2 protected T cells from apoptosis by preventing Fas overexpression induced by TMV and blocking caspase 8 activation by up-regulating cFLIP. Jurkat cells overexpressing cFLIP were more resistant to TMV-induced apoptosis than the mock-transfected cells (p < 0.02). Signaling via the PI3K/Akt pathway, IRX-2 corrected the imbalance of pro- versus anti-apoptotic proteins induced by TMV and promoted NF-κB translocation to the nucleus. CHX abolished IRX-2-mediated protection in T cells, suggesting that IRX-2 induces de novo synthesis of one or more proteins that are required for protection. CONCLUSIONS: This biologic may be therapeutically useful for protection of activated T cells from tumor-induced immune suppression and death.

IRX-2 increases the T cell-specific immune response to protein/peptide vaccines.

Therapeutic cancer vaccines are attractive due to the prospect of specificity and their lack of toxicity; however, their clinical development has been hampered by several biologic and clinical challenges. One of the most important biologic challenges is the relative lack of effective cellular immune adjuvants. Effective physiologic immune responses are characterized by the local generation of a complex cytokine environment that activates and regulates multiple immune cell types. IRX-2 is a primary cell-derived biologic with physiological levels of multiple active cytokine components, produced under pharmaceutical standards. The hypothesis that IRX-2 amplifies the T cell response to defined antigens was assessed in mice by measuring the T cell-specific peptide response to a dominant mouse peptide (NFT) derived from human prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA). IRX-2 enhances the T cell response to NFT when antigens were delivered either via irradiated cells expressing human PSMA, NFT peptide in Incomplete Freund's adjuvant (IFA) or NFT peptide conjugated to KLH. The T cell-specific activity was measured in spleen or lymph nodes cells by IFN-γ ELISpot and/or IFN-γ secretion over 6 days or in vivo by peptide-specific delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction (DTH). Further more, a single administration of IRX-2 with the antigen was not active as compared to 4 or 9 additional administrations which were sufficient to enhance the T cell response to antigens. The influence of IRX-2 on the B cell response to ovalbumin when it was used as a carrier protein was measured by ELISA. IRX-2 was compared to a commercially available combination adjuvant (MPL+TDM in squalene/Tween 80) which based on the literature is a potent adjuvant in murine systems. In the T cell assay IRX-2 was superior to the commercially available combination adjuvant and while IRX-2 also increased antibody titer, it was not as potent as the combination adjuvant. Mice immunized with IRX-2 and antigen also exhibited delayed tumor progression following challenge with PSMA-expressing tumor cells. These studies demonstrate that IRX-2 is an immunomodulator with adjuvant activity which preferentially enhances the T cell-specific responses to tumor associated antigens. Based on these studies, IRX-2 is a candidate for evaluation as a T cell adjuvant in a variety of preclinical vaccine delivery systems as well as in human clinical trials with cancer vaccine candidates.

IRX-2, a novel in vivo immunotherapeutic, induces maturation and activation of human dendritic cells in vitro.

IRX-2 is a uniform, well-defined set of natural cytokines currently in Phase II clinical trials for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC). In preliminary clinical studies of HNSCC patients, IRX-2 therapy has shown promising results, increasing overall survival of patients from 32% to 61% at 48 months. Although it is known that specific cytokines in IRX-2 enhance T cell activity [e.g., interleukin-2 (IL-2), interferon-gamma, IL-1beta], we chose to investigate the influence of IRX-2 on monocyte-derived dendritic cells (Mo-DCs) isolated from human peripheral blood in an effort to further understand the clinical findings. We show here that IRX-2 treatment of human monocyte-derived DC resulted in morphologic, phenotypic, and functional changes consistent with the development of mature activated DC. Specifically, IRX-2-treated DC increased expression of CD83 and CCR7, markers for DC maturation and migration, respectively, and increased the expression of HLA-DR, CD54, and the costimulatory molecules CD86 and CD40, which are critical mediators of T cell activation. Functional changes in DC induced by IRX-2 included a reduced endocytic capacity, increased ability to stimulate T cells and increased IL-12 cytokine production. These results provide a plausible mechanistic explanation for the in vivo clinical activity of IRX-2 and an additional rationale for the use of IRX-2-based immunotherapy in patients.

The influence of various hematology analyzers on component platelet counts.

Hematology analyzers designed to count platelets in samples of whole blood are used to enumerate the total number of platelets in components prepared for transfusion. This report addresses the issue of variability in platelet counts obtained with different models of hematology analyzers. The influence of a common calibration procedure, involving one level of porcine platelets, on the extent of variability was also evaluated. Identical sets of samples of simulated and apheresis-derived human platelets were counted by multiple laboratories in 3 separate studies. In the first 2 exercises, 7 samples of both porcine platelets and modified goat erythrocytes with targeted platelets counts from 0.2 to 4.0 x 10(12)/L were counted without prior dilution. In both exercises, the samples were counted multiple times after routine calibration using instructions provided by the manufacturers of the various hematology analyzers used. In the second exercise, the samples were recounted after the hematology analyzers were recalibrated with a common calibrant consisting of porcine platelets at a targeted concentration of 0.5 x 10(12)/L. In the first and second exercises, 20 and 18 hematology analyzers were used, respectively. In the third exercise, 6 samples prepared from a single unit of apheresis platelets with targeted counts from 0.2 to 1.64 x 10(12)/L were shipped by an overnight courier and counted in triplicate on the day of arrival. Eleven hematology analyzers were used. The influence of recalibration was evaluated statistically by using the 95% prediction interval for the mean of a future set of observations. The platelet counts measured with a specific type of hematology analyzer provided the data to calculate the 95% prediction interval. With routine calibration, a wide variability in platelet counts was observed with all levels of both simulated and apheresis-derived human platelets. For example, with porcine platelets at a targeted level of 0.4 x 10 (12)/L, the platelet counts ranged from 0.31 to 0.47 x 10(12)/L. Recalibration reduced the extent of variability observed with all levels of simulated and apheresis-derived human platelets by increasing the observed platelet counts determined with a subset of hematology analyzers that produced platelet counts in the lower portion of the range. With recalibration, the mean platelet counts obtained with most hematology analyzers, especially with samples having targeted platelet levels no greater than 1.0 x 10(12)/L, were within or near the 95% prediction interval determined with the instruments that provided the highest platelet counts with routine calibration. With recalibration, the reproducibility of the platelet counts was considered to be good for all hematology analyzers with all levels of simulated and apheresis-derived human platelets for most of the instruments. The coefficient of variance did not exceed 6%, with most of the values ranging from 1% to 3%. This study therefore found that the platelet counts of platelet concentrates can be markedly influenced by the type of hematology analyzer used. A common calibration procedure designed specifically for the range of platelet counts in platelet products may be beneficial considering that many different hematology analyzers are being used to count platelets.