Effect of storage temperature and time on measurement of serum symmetric dimethylarginine concentration using point-of-care and commercial laboratory analyzers in cats and dogs.

BACKGROUND: Stability of serum symmetric dimethylarginine (sSDMA) during short- and long-term storage has not been assessed for the immunoassay of the Point-of-Care IDEXX Catalyst DX (POC) analyzer and the Enzyme Multiplied Immunoassay Technique of IDEXX commercial laboratory (CL). Also, the agreement between both analyzers is questioned. OBJECTIVES: To determine (a) the effect of storage time and temperature on sSDMA measured by POC and CL; (b) the agreement between sSDMA measured by POC and CL; and (c) the imprecision of the POC. ANIMALS: Serum of cats (n = 17) and dogs (n = 18) with a range of SDMA concentrations (6 to >100 µg/dL). METHODS: Based on an equivalence trial with predefined equivalence range (-3.0 to +3.0 µg/dL) and using T0 as baseline, stability was evaluated after 24 hours at 22°C and 4°C (POC); after 7 days at 4°C (POC and CL) and after 10 and 24 months at -24°C and -80°C (CL). Bland-Altman plots enabled method comparison. Imprecision of the POC was assessed by duplicate sSDMA measurements at T0. RESULTS: The POC analyzer produced equivalent sSDMA measurements if samples were stored for 24 hours at 4°C (95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.5-2.0 µg/dL), but not when stored for 24 hours at room temperature (RT; 95% CI: -4.1 to 0.5 µg/dL) or after 7 days at 4°C (95% CI: -3.6-1.0 µg/dL). The CL analyzer was less affected by preanalytical variation with clinically similar results obtained when samples were stored for 7 days at 4°C (95% CI: -2.2 to 2.4 µg/dL) and for at least 24 months at -24°C (95% CI: -1.7 to 2.9 µg/dL) and -80°C (95% CI: -1.5 to 3 µg/dL). A relevant mean difference of -2.3 µg/dL between both analyzers was found. Duplicate POC measurements were equivalent (95% CI: -2.6 to 2.0 µg/dL). CONCLUSIONS: Delayed analysis may significantly change sSDMA depending on storage and measurement conditions. Interchangeable use of assays should be done with caution because analytical variation could be interpreted as clinically relevant change.

Plasma symmetric dimethylarginine and creatinine concentrations and glomerular filtration rate in cats with normal and decreased renal function.

BACKGROUND: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is the gold standard in assessing renal function but is impractical. Serum creatinine (sCr) has limited sensitivity in identifying early chronic kidney disease (CKD), whereas symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) has been commercialized as more accurate biomarker. Studies comparing SDMA and sCr with GFR in cats are limited. OBJECTIVES: To further investigate the diagnostic performance of SDMA in nonazotemic and azotemic cats. ANIMALS: Forty-nine client-owned cats: 17 cats with CKD, 15 cats with diabetes mellitus (DM), and 17 healthy cats. METHODS: Retrospective study using spare blood samples from cats with documented sCr and GFR results for SDMA analysis. Diagnostic performances of SDMA and sCr were evaluated using correlation coefficients, sensitivities, specificities, and receiver operator characteristic curves. RESULTS: Compared to healthy cats and cats with DM, CKD cats had significantly higher SDMAplasma (26.7 ± 9.9 µg/dL) and sCr (249.7 ± 71.6 µmol/L [2.8 ± 0.8 mg/dL]; both P < .001) values. SDMAplasma (τB = -0.57; P < .001) and sCr (τB = -0.56; P < .001) were significantly correlated with GFR. SDMAplasma (τB = 0.52; P < .001) had a significant relationship with sCr. SDMAplasma and sCr had similar sensitivity (76%-94% and 71%-88%, respectively) in detecting reduced renal function. Creatinine had higher specificity (94%-96%) than SDMAplasma (75%-76%) (P < .05). CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: In this study of azotemic and nonazotemic cats, SDMA was a reliable marker to identify decreased GFR. However, superiority of SDMA over sCr could not be confirmed.

The establishment of marine protected areas in Senegal: untangling the interactions between international institutions and national actors.

International institutions, understood as sets of rules contained in international agreements, are aimed at orienting national governments towards specific policy options. Nevertheless, they can determine a change in national policies and practices only if states are willing and capable of incorporating international obligations into their national legislations and ensuring their application and enforcement in areas that follow completely under national jurisdiction. The establishment of marine protected areas promoted by international agreements as a tool for the protection of marine resources represents an interesting case for revealing the complex interactions between international institutions and national actors. Particularly, the establishment of these areas in Senegal shows the salience of domestic constellations of actors who may support or undercut national commitments to international regimes: political elites, bureaucracies, the general public and target groups. By anchoring the empirical analysis to an actor-centred institutionalist perspective, the article explains how dynamic constellations of actors can distort the penetration of international objectives in the national policy framework. Different constellations of national actors can indeed bend international institutions at different moments: during the formulation of a new law in line with international obligations; in the definition of its implementation framework; and in the enforcement of national policies.