Streamlining Tangible 3D Printed and Intangible XR Content Creation and Evaluation: The ENTICE Experience.

ENTICE aimed to use co-creative methodologies in order to build a solid creation pipeline for medical experiential content. The project has developed and evaluated immersive learning resources and tools aiming to support well-defined learning objectives using tangible and intangible resources (AR/VR/MR, 3D printing) that are highly sought in the fields of anatomy and surgery. In this paper the preliminary results from the evaluation of the learning resources and tools in 3 countries as well as the lessons learnt are presented towards to the improvement of the medical education process.

Evaluation of a Decision Support System for Obstructive Sleep Apnea with Nonlinear Analysis of Respiratory Signals.

INTRODUCTION: Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) is a common sleep disorder requiring the time/money consuming polysomnography for diagnosis. Alternative methods for initial evaluation are sought. Our aim was the prediction of Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) in patients potentially suffering from OSA based on nonlinear analysis of respiratory biosignals during sleep, a method that is related to the pathophysiology of the disorder. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients referred to a Sleep Unit (135) underwent full polysomnography. Three nonlinear indices (Largest Lyapunov Exponent, Detrended Fluctuation Analysis and Approximate Entropy) extracted from two biosignals (airflow from a nasal cannula, thoracic movement) and one linear derived from Oxygen saturation provided input to a data mining application with contemporary classification algorithms for the creation of predictive models for AHI. RESULTS: A linear regression model presented a correlation coefficient of 0.77 in predicting AHI. With a cutoff value of AHI = 8, the sensitivity and specificity were 93% and 71.4% in discrimination between patients and normal subjects. The decision tree for the discrimination between patients and normal had sensitivity and specificity of 91% and 60%, respectively. Certain obtained nonlinear values correlated significantly with commonly accepted physiological parameters of people suffering from OSA. DISCUSSION: We developed a predictive model for the presence/severity of OSA using a simple linear equation and additional decision trees with nonlinear features extracted from 3 respiratory recordings. The accuracy of the methodology is high and the findings provide insight to the underlying pathophysiology of the syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Reliable predictions of OSA are possible using linear and nonlinear indices from only 3 respiratory signals during sleep. The proposed models could lead to a better study of the pathophysiology of OSA and facilitate initial evaluation/follow up of suspected patients OSA utilizing a practical low cost methodology. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01161381.

Screening of patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome using C4.5 algorithm based on non linear analysis of respiratory signals during sleep.

AIM: To classify patients with possible diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS) into groups according to the severity of the disease using a decision tree producing algorithm based on nonlinear analysis of 3 respiratory signals instead of the use of full polysomnography. PATIENTS-METHODS: Eighty-six consecutive patients referred to the Sleep Unit of a Pulmonology Department underwent full polysomnography and their tests were manually scored. Three nonlinear indices (Largest Lyapunov Exponent-LLE, Detrended Fluctuation Analysis-DFA and Approximate Entropy-APEN) were extracted from two respiratory signals (nasal cannula flow-F and thoracic belt-T). The oxygen saturation signal (SpO(2)) was also selected. The above measurements provided data to the C4.5 algorithm using a data mining application. RESULTS: Two decision trees were produced using linear and nonlinear data from 3 respiratory signals. The discrimination between normal subjects and sufferers from OSAS presented an accuracy of 84.9% and a recall of 90.3% using the variables age, sex, DFA from F and Time with SpO(2)<90% (T90). The classification of patients into severity groups had an accuracy of 74.2% and a recall of 81.1% using the variables APEN from F, DFA from F and T90. CONCLUSION: It is possible to have reliable predictions of the severity of OSAS using linear and nonlinear indices from only two respiratory signals during sleep instead of performing full polysomnography. The proposed algorithm could be used for screening patients suspected to suffer from OSAS.