Are contaminated soil and groundwater remediation with nanoscale zero-valent iron sustainable? An analysis of case studies.

Nanoscale zero valent iron (nZVI) is globally the main nanomaterial used in contaminated site remediation. This study aims to evaluate the sustainability of using nZVI in the nanoremediation of contaminated sites and to determine the factors that affect the sustainability of the use of nZVI in remediation. Five case studies of nZVI use on a pilot scale were selected. Life cycle analysis tools were used to evaluate environmental, economic, social impacts, and sustainability. The functional unit of the life cycle analyses was 1.00 m3 of remediated soil and groundwater. Case study of Brazil was the least sustainable, while case study of United States was the most sustainable. Only the modification of the functional unit results in variations in the sustainability index. Different factors influence the sustainability of nZVI in remediation, the main factor being the amount of nZVI used in the processes. Finally, this work contributes significantly to the state-of-the-art sustainable use of nZVI in remediation. This is a pioneering study in the detailed and comprehensive assessment of the sustainability of the use of nZVI in remediation. Through the analysis of case studies, it is possible to determine the main factors that influence the sustainability of the nZVI remediation life cycle.

Social life cycle assessment of the nanoscale zero-valent iron synthesis process for application in contaminated site remediation.

Nanoscale zero-valent iron (nZVI) is the main nanomaterial used in environmental remediation processes. However, as with any remediation technique, the production and the use of nanomaterials can also cause environmental, economic, and social impacts. Thus, the present study investigated the social life cycle analysis (S-LCA) of nZVI production methods applied in environmental remediation. Three production methods of nZVI were selected for analysis: milling, reduction with sodium borohydride, and reduction with hydrogen gas. The social life cycle analysis was developed based on the ISO 14040 standard steps. Limits of the S-LCA system involve the stages of raw material extraction and manufacturing when not considering the use of nZVI postproduction. The analysis of social impact was conducted considering the involved stakeholders, through the application and improvement of an existing methodology and through the following procedures: characterization of social indicators according to a normalized scale, identification of the normalization factor for the indicators, employment of a social questionnaire, calculation of the total points in each impact subcategory (midpoint), calculation of the total points in the impact categories (endpoint), and calculation of the Social Index. The three production methods of nZVI result in significantly equal Social Indices. All methods were classified as socially sustainable according to the implemented methodology. The sensitivity analysis demonstrates the results dependent with the geographic location of the inventory data, while changes in the weighting can affect the Social Index results. Overall, this study significantly contributed to the state-of-the-art application of S-LCA in studies using nanomaterials; however, several limitations were also observed, and thus, steps for future development were suggested to future researches. In addition, this study improved the S-LCA methodology which can be used to assess the social impact of any product.

Proposal for an optimized method for sustainable remediation evaluation and application: implementation of a multi-criteria process.

As sustainable remediation methods do not yet have a consolidated approach, a detailed assessment of the level of satisfaction for sustainability prospects is necessary. So, this study aims to evaluate the sustainability level of sustainable remediation methods according to the visions of decision makers in this field, in order to propose an optimized method that best represents its approach. We considered eight methods applied to sustainable remediation and nine decision criteria for evaluation. The analytical hierarchy process (AHP) of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) was applied to judge and weigh the criteria by stakeholders. These weights were used to calculate the degrees of sustainability for all the methods, to classify these within a ranking, and to optimize the one that obtained the best performance. The results indicated that when the criteria were weighted, the criterion (C7), protection of human health and the environment in general, obtained the best placement, and the degree of sustainability achieved by each method indicates that ITRC (Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council) had the best performance. Finally, the proposal method resulted in an explicit approach of all the considered criteria. This article presents a new approach compared with those already applied in this context and provides more robust resources to examine to what extent the methods integrate the premises of sustainable remediation. Graphical Abstract .