Assessment of the Clinical Impact of a Liver-Specific, BCAA-Enriched Diet in Major Liver Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between nutrition and liver disease is relevant for the outcome after surgery. Patients with liver cirrhosis characteristically show protein-energy malnutrition with decreased levels of branched-chain amino acids (BCAA) and increased levels of aromatic amino acids. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective controlled clinical trial including 57 patients after liver transplantation or major liver resection surgery in order to test the effect of early postoperative nutrition on the outcome and nutrition profile of these patients. The test group received a dietetic program composed of ingredients naturally rich in BCAA (BCAA group), and the control group received standard hospital meals. Patient survival, liver function tests, subjective well-being, and a nutritional status including amino acid profiles were analyzed immediately and 14 days after major liver surgery (secondary end points). General health and well-being were assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (primary end point). RESULTS: In-depth analysis of amino acid profiles was performed for patients undergoing liver resection (n = 21) and liver transplantation (n = 36). Interestingly, amino acid profiles did not correlate with body mass index or the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score. Patients scheduled for liver transplantation showed significantly lower levels of BCAA pretransplant compared to patients undergoing liver resection. Patients in the liver resection subgroup were more likely to benefit from the BCAA cuisine in terms of significantly higher food intake and subjective rating. The clinical liver function tests, however, did not show statistical difference between the BCAA group and the control group in the examination period of 14 days. CONCLUSION: Our specifically designed BCAA-enriched diet resulted in greater patient satisfaction and compliance with nutrition. A larger trial or longer-term follow-up may be required to identify an effect on survival, recovery, surgical complications, protein profiles, and amino acid profiles.

Early Post-Operative Pancreatitis and Systemic Inflammatory Response Assessed by Serum Lipase and IL-6 Predict Pancreatic Fistula.

BACKGROUND: Post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains a critical complication after pancreatic resection. This prospective pilot study evaluates perioperative markers of pancreatitis and systemic inflammation to predict clinically relevant grade B/C-POPF (CR-POPF). METHODS: All patients undergoing pancreatic resection from December 2017 to April 2019 were prospectively enrolled. Surgical procedures and outcomes were correlated with perioperative blood markers. ROC analysis was performed to assess their predictive value for CR-POPF. Cut-offs were calculated with the Youden index. RESULTS: In total, 70 patients were analysed (43 pancreatoduodenectomies and 27 distal pancreatectomies). In-hospital/90-d mortality and morbidity were 5.7/7.1% (n = 4/n = 5) and 75.7% (n = 53). Major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3a) occurred in 28 (40.0%) patients, CR-POPF in 20 (28.6%) patients. Serum lipase (cut-off > 51U/L) and IL-6 (> 56.5 ng/l) on POD3 were significant predictors for CR-POPF (AUC = 0.799, 95%-CI 0.686-0.912 and AUC = 0.784, 95%-CI 0.668-0.900; combined AUC = 0.858, 95%-CI 0.758-0.958; all p < 0.001). Patients with both or one factor(s) above cut-off more frequently developed CR-POPF than cases without (100 vs. 50% vs. 7.5%, p < 0.001). This also applied for overall and severe complications (p = 0.013 and p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Post-operative pancreatitis and inflammatory response are major determinants for development of POPF. A combination of serum lipase and IL-6 on POD3 is a highly significant early predictor of CR-POPF and overall complications, potentially guiding patient management. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study protocol was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04294797).

Integrating interventional oncology in the treatment of liver tumors.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous ablation techniques offer a vast armamentarium for local, minimally invasive treatment of liver tumors, nowadays representing an established therapeutic option, which is integrated in treatment algorithms, especially for non-resectable liver tumors. The results of ablative treatment compare very well to surgical treatment in liver lesions, and confirm that these techniques are a valuable option for bridging for transplantation. Different techniques have been established to perform tumor ablation, and the feasibility varies according to the procedure and technical skills of the operator, depending on the size and location of the liver lesion. In recent years, stereotactic multi-needle techniques using 3D trajectory planning, general anesthesia, and tube disconnection during needle placement have had a strong impact on the application range of ablation for liver tumors. CONCLUSION: It is well known that creating a sufficient ablation margin and overlapping ablation zones is one key issue to enable ablation of large liver lesions with tumor-free margins (A0 ablation in analogy to R0 resection). Image fusion during treatment and follow-up assure highly accurate staging procedures and interventional planning. NOVEL ASPECTS: Review on the standards in ablation techniques for the treatment of liver tumors. Update on different ablation techniques, indications, and contraindications for percutaneous liver tumor treatment. Summary of recently published reports on liver tumor ablation.