Bioengineering secreted proteases convert divergent Rcr3 orthologs and paralogs into extracellular immune co-receptors.

Secreted immune proteases Rcr3 (Required for Cladosporium resistance-3) and Pip1 (Phytophthora- inhibited protease-1) of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) are both inhibited by Avr2 from the fungal plant pathogen Cladosporium fulvum. However, only Rcr3 acts as a decoy co-receptor that detects Avr2 in the presence of the Cf-2 immune receptor. Here, we identified crucial residues in tomato Rcr3 that are required for Cf-2-mediated signalling and bioengineered various proteases to trigger Avr2/Cf-2-dependent immunity. Despite substantial divergence in Rcr3 orthologs from eggplant (Solanum melongena) and tobacco (Nicotiana spp.), minimal alterations were sufficient to trigger Avr2/Cf-2-mediated immune signalling. By contrast, tomato Pip1 was bioengineered with 16 Rcr3-specific residues to initiate Avr2/Cf-2-triggered immune signalling. These residues cluster on one side of the protein next to the substrate-binding groove, indicating a potential Cf-2 interaction site. Our findings also revealed that Rcr3 and Pip1 have distinct substrate preferences determined by two variant residues, and that both are suboptimal for binding Avr2. This study advances our understanding of Avr2 perception and opens avenues to bioengineer proteases to broaden pathogen recognition in other crops.

Modelling and manipulation of aphid-mediated spread of non-persistently transmitted viruses.

Aphids vector many plant viruses in a non-persistent manner i.e., virus particles bind loosely to the insect mouthparts (stylet). This means that acquisition of virus particles from infected plants, and inoculation of uninfected plants by viruliferous aphids, are rapid processes that require only brief probes of the plant's epidermal cells. Virus infection alters plant biochemistry, which causes changes in emission of volatile organic compounds and altered accumulation of nutrients and defence compounds in host tissues. These virus-induced biochemical changes can influence the migration, settling and feeding behaviours of aphids. Working mainly with cucumber mosaic virus and several potyviruses, a number of research groups have noted that in some plants, virus infection engenders resistance to aphid settling (sometimes accompanied by emission of deceptively attractive volatiles, that can lead to exploratory penetration by aphids without settling). However, in certain other hosts, virus infection renders plants more susceptible to aphid colonisation. It has been suggested that induction of resistance to aphid settling encourages transmission of non-persistently transmitted viruses, while induction of susceptibility to settling retards transmission. However, recent mathematical modelling indicates that both virus-induced effects contribute to epidemic development at different scales. We have also investigated at the molecular level the processes leading to induction, by cucumber mosaic virus, of feeding deterrence versus susceptibility to aphid infestation. Both processes involve complex interactions between specific viral proteins and host factors, resulting in manipulation or suppression of the plant's immune networks.

Exogenous Application of RNAi-Inducing Double-Stranded RNA Inhibits Aphid-Mediated Transmission of a Plant Virus.

Plant viruses are difficult to control, and they decrease both the quality and yield of crops, thus threatening global food security. A new approach that uses topical application of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) to induce antiviral RNA-interference has been shown to be effective at preventing virus infection in a range of plants following mechanical inoculation. In this study, topical application of dsRNA was effective against mechanical inoculation and aphid-mediated inoculation with the potyvirus bean common mosaic virus (BCMV). Topical application of dsRNAs targeting either the coding region of the potyviral nuclear inclusion b (NIb) protein (BCMVNIb-dsRNA) or the coat protein (CP) coding region (BCMVCP-dsRNA) protected Nicotiana benthamiana and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) plants against mechanical inoculation with BCMV. BCMVCP-dsRNA was selected for subsequent aphid transmission experiments. BCMVCP-dsRNA was loaded onto layered double hydroxide nanoparticles to form BCMVCP-BioClay which is a more stable formulation for delivering dsRNA than naked dsRNA. BCMVCP-BioClay was shown to be successful in protecting plants against BCMV transmission by the aphid Myzus persicae. Spraying detached N. benthamiana leaves with BCMVCP-BioClay 5 days prior to exposure to viruliferous aphids protected the leaves from infection by BCMV. Importantly, spraying of intact N. benthamiana and cowpea plants with BCMVCP-BioClay 5 days prior to exposure to viruliferous aphids protected plants of both species from BCMV infection. This study demonstrates that topical application of dsRNA using BioClay protects plants from aphid-mediated virus transmission, which is an important first step toward developing practical application of this approach in crop protection.

Viral Manipulation of Plant Stress Responses and Host Interactions With Insects.

Do the alterations in plant defensive signaling and metabolism that occur in susceptible hosts following virus infection serve any purpose beyond directly aiding viruses to replicate and spread? Or indeed, are these modifications to host phenotype purely incidental consequences of virus infection? A growing body of data, in particular from studies of viruses vectored by whiteflies and aphids, indicates that viruses influence the efficiency of their own transmission by insect vectors and facilitate mutualistic relationships between viruses and their insect vectors. Furthermore, it appears that viruses may be able to increase the opportunity for transmission in the long term by providing reward to the host plants that they infect. This may be conditional, for example, by aiding host survival under conditions of drought or cold or, more surprisingly, by helping plants attract beneficial insects such as pollinators. In this chapter, we cover three main areas. First, we describe the molecular-level interactions governing viral manipulation of host plant biology. Second, we review evidence that virus-induced changes in plant phenotype enhance virus transmission. Finally, we discuss how direct and indirect manipulation of insects and plants might impact on the evolution of viruses and their hosts.