JAK2/Y343/STAT5 signaling axis is required for erythropoietin-mediated protection against ischemic injury in primary renal tubular epithelial cells.

Erythropoietin has emerged as a potential therapy for the treatment of ischemic tissue injury. In erythroid cells, the JAK2/Y343/STAT5 signaling axis has been shown to be necessary for stress but not steady-state erythropoiesis. The requirement for STAT5 activation in erythropoietin-mediated protection from ischemic injury has not been well-studied. To answer this question, we induced reproducible necrotic ischemic injury in primary mouse renal tubular epithelial cells (RTEC) in vitro. Using RTEC from erythropoietin receptor mutant mice with differential STAT5 signaling capabilities, we demonstrated first, that EPO administration either before or during injury significantly protects against mild-moderate but not severe necrotic cell death; and second, the JAK2/Y343/STAT5 signaling axis is required for protection against ischemic injury in primary mouse RTEC. In addition, we identified Pim-3, a prosurvival STAT5 target gene, as responsive to EPO in the noninjured kidney both in vitro and in vivo.

Immunomagnetic bead cell isolates reduce kidney donor cold ischemia time, STAT crossmatch time and histocompatibility test cost.

The use of immunomagnetic beads for STAT cadaveric crossmatching for renal transplantation reduces test cost by 50%, laboratory work-up time by 50% and cold ischemia time by 4 h as compared with the nylon wool method of T- and B-lymphocyte separation.

The flow cytometric crossmatch and early renal transplant loss.

Data from this retrospective study indicate that a positive two-color T and/or B cell flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM) is predictive of early renal allograft loss (less than 2 months) in cadaveric kidney donor recipients who had a negative crossmatch by the antihuman globulin complement-dependent cytotoxicity technique. Among 90 cadaveric kidney donor recipients (67 primary, 23 regrafts), 14 (8 primary, 6 regrafts) lost their renal allografts within 2 months, and 10 of the 14 were FCXM positive and HLA sensitized. The remaining 76 allografts survived beyond 2 months, 12 of which were FCXM-positive. Thus, the FCXM sensitivity rate for detecting early graft loss was 71%, and the specificity rate was 84%. Cadaveric graft-loss rates at 2 months were 33% for primary and 60% for FCXM-positive regrafts in contrast to 7% for primary and 0% for FCXM-negative regrafts. The difference in early graft loss between FCXM-positive and FCXM-negative recipients was statistically significant (P less than 0.0001). Subset analyses of FCXM-positive graft recipients indicate: (1) previous early graft loss contraindicates transplantation of an FXCM-positive regraft (P = 0.03); and (2) panel reactive antibody (PRA) less than or equal to 10% at crossmatch is not associated with early graft loss (P = 0.04). There was no significant difference in 1-year graft survival between primary and regrafts in either FCXM-negative recipients (85% vs. 77%, respectively) or FCXM-positive recipients (67% vs. 40%). All 12 of the FCXM-positive primary and regrafts that survived 2 months continued to function at 2 years. Stepwise logistic regression analysis of 5 independent predictor variables (FCXM status, gender, primary vs. regraft status, PRA level, and HLA mismatched antigens) indicated that the FCXM test was the best predictor of early graft loss. When FCXM results of the 90 cadaveric graft recipients were ranked in three groups, an FCXM channel shift of 29 or greater (third tertile) on a 1024 channel log scale was associated with a 7.0-fold (95% confidence interval 1.9-25.5) increased risk of early graft failure when compared to the first two tertiles. These data indicate that the FCXM offers an additional approach for identifying sensitized patients at risk of early renal allograft loss.