Out of touch? How trauma shapes the experience of social touch - Neural and endocrine pathways.

Trauma can shape the way an individual experiences the world and interacts with other people. Touch is a key component of social interactions, but surprisingly little is known about how trauma exposure influences the processing of social touch. In this review, we examine possible neurobiological pathways through which trauma can influence touch processing and lead to touch aversion and avoidance in trauma-exposed individuals. Emerging evidence indicates that trauma may affect sensory touch thresholds by modulating activity in the primary sensory cortex and posterior insula. Disturbances in multisensory integration and oxytocin reactivity combined with diminished reward-related and anxiolytic responses may induce a bias towards negative appraisal of touch contexts. Furthermore, hippocampus deactivation during social touch may reflect a dissociative state. These changes depend not only on the type and severity of the trauma but also on the features of the touch. We hypothesise that disrupted touch processing may impair social interactions and confer elevated risk for future stress-related disorders.

Electrodermal Activity Biofeedback Alters Evolving Functional Brain Networks in People With Epilepsy, but in a Non-specific Manner.

There is evidence that biofeedback of electrodermal activity (EDA) can reduce seizure frequency in people with epilepsy. Prior studies have linked EDA biofeedback to a diffuse brain activation as a potential functional mechanism. Here, we investigated whether short-term EDA biofeedback alters EEG-derived large-scale functional brain networks in people with epilepsy. In this prospective controlled trial, thirty participants were quasi-randomly assigned to one of three biofeedback conditions (arousal, sham, or relaxation) and performed a single, 30-min biofeedback training while undergoing continuous EEG recordings. Based on the EEG, we derived evolving functional brain networks and examined their topological, robustness, and stability properties over time. Potential effects on attentional-executive functions and mood were monitored via a neuropsychological assessment and subjective self-ratings. Participants assigned to the relaxation group seemed to be most successful in meeting the task requirements for this specific control condition (i.e., decreasing EDA). Participants in the sham group were more successful in increasing EDA than participants in the arousal group. However, only the arousal biofeedback training was associated with a prolonged robustness-enhancing effect on networks. Effects on other network properties were mostly unspecific for the different groups. None of the biofeedback conditions affected attentional-executive functions or subjective behavioral measures. Our results suggest that global characteristics of evolving functional brain networks are modified by EDA biofeedback. Some alterations persisted after the single training session; however, the effects were largely unspecific across the different biofeedback protocols. Further research should address changes of local network characteristics and whether multiple training sessions will result in more specific network modifications.