Fourth International Workgroup on Genotoxicity testing: results of the in vivo Comet assay workgroup.

As part of the Fourth International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT), held 9-10 September 2005 in San Francisco, California, an expert working group on the Comet assay was convened to review and discuss some of the procedures and methods recommended in previous documents. Particular attention was directed at the in vivo rodent, alkaline (pH >13) version of the assay. The aim was to review those protocol areas which were unclear or which required more detail in order to produce a standardized protocol with maximum acceptability by international regulatory agencies. The areas covered were: number of dose levels required, cell isolation techniques, measures of cytotoxicity, scoring of comets (i.e., manually or by image analysis), and the need for historical negative/positive control data. It was decided that a single limit dose was not sufficient although the required number of dose levels was not stipulated. The method of isolating cells was thought not to have a qualitative effect on the assay but more data were needed before a conclusion could be drawn. Concurrent measures of cytotoxicity were required with histopathological examination of tissues for necrosis or apoptosis as the "Gold Standard". As for analysing the comets, the consensus was that image analysis was preferred but not required. Finally, the minimal number of studies required to generate a historical positive or negative control database was not defined; rather the emphasis was placed on demonstrating the stability of the negative/positive control data. It was also agreed that a minimum reporting standard would be developed which would be consistent with OECD in vivo genotoxicity test method guidelines.

Dimethylhydrazine: a reliable positive control for the short sampling time in the UDS assay in vivo.

In the first international guideline addressing the unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS) assay in vivo (OECD guideline no. 486, adopted July 1997) only the genotoxic liver carcinogen N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) is proposed as positive control for the short sampling time. Since NDMA is extremely volatile, alternative positive controls should be identified to facilitate handling and reduce exposure risk during routine testing. At Bayer AG and at RCC-CCR GmbH, the genotoxic but non-volatile dimethylhydrazine (DMH; as dihydrochloride) was used instead as positive control in livers of Wistar rats and to a limited extent of NRMI mice after 2-4h exposure. As shown by the data presented in this paper DMH induced a positive result in a total of 21 UDS in vivo studies over a period of 7 years. A negative result was never seen for DMH. Due to these results DMH was proven to be a suitable and reliable positive control in the UDS assay in vivo. Consequently, DMH should be considered as positive control for the short sampling time in the next issue of OECD guideline no. 486.