Baseline characteristics and enrichment results from the SONAR trial.

AIM: The SONAR trial uses an enrichment design based on the individual response to the selective endothelin receptor antagonist atrasentan on efficacy (the degree of the individual response in the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio [UACR]) and safety/tolerability (signs of sodium retention and acute increases in serum creatinine) to assess the effects of this agent on major renal outcomes. The patient population and enrichment results are described here. METHODS: Patients with type 2 diabetes with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) within 25 to 75 mL/min/1.73 m2 and UACR between 300 and 5000 mg/g were enrolled. After a run-in period, eligible patients received 0.75 mg/d of atrasentan for 6 weeks. A total of 2648 responder patients in whom UACR decreased by ≥30% compared to baseline were enrolled, as were 1020 non-responders with a UACR decrease of <30%. Patients who experienced a weight gain of >3 kg and in whom brain natriuretic peptide exceeded ≥300 pg/mL, or who experienced an increase in serum creatinine >20% (0.5 mg/dL), were not randomized. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar for atrasentan responders and non-responders. Upon entry to the study, median UACR was 802 mg/g in responders and 920 mg/g in non-responders. After 6 weeks of treatment with atrasentan, the UACR change in responders was -48.8% (95% CI, -49.8% to -47.9%) and in non-responders was -1.2% (95% CI, -6.4% to 3.9%). Changes in other renal risk markers were similar between responders and non-responders except for a marginally greater reduction in systolic blood pressure and eGFR in responders. CONCLUSIONS: The enrichment period has successfully identified a population with a profound UACR reduction without clinical signs of sodium retention in whom a large atrasentan effect on clinically important renal outcomes is possible. The SONAR trial aims to establish whether atrasentan confers renal protection.

Rationale and protocol of the Study Of diabetic Nephropathy with AtRasentan (SONAR) trial: A clinical trial design novel to diabetic nephropathy.

AIMS: Individuals with diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at high risk for renal events. Recent trials of novel treatments have been negative, possibly because of variability in response to treatment of the target risk factor. Atrasentan is a selective endothelin A receptor antagonist that reduces urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR), with a large variability between patients. We are assessing its effect on renal outcomes in the Study Of diabetic Nephropathy with AtRasentan (SONAR; NCT01858532) with an enrichment design (>30% lowering of albuminuria) to select patients most likely to benefit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: SONAR is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with approximately 3500 participants who have stage 2-4 CKD and macroalbuminuria and are receiving a maximum tolerated dose of a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor. RESULTS: After 6 weeks of exposure to atrasentan 0.75 mg once daily (enrichment period), participants with ≥30% UACR decrease and no tolerability issues (responders) were randomly assigned to placebo or atrasentan 0.75 mg/day. The responder group will be used for primary efficacy and safety analyses. Approximately 1000 participants with <30% UACR reduction (non-responders) were also randomized to placebo or atrasentan. The primary endpoint is a composite of a sustained doubling of serum creatinine or end-stage renal disease. The original power calculation indicated that a total of 425 primary renal events in the responder group provides 90% power to detect a 27% reduction in relative risk (alpha level of .05). CONCLUSION: SONAR aims to determine whether atrasentan added to guideline-recommended therapies safely reduces the risk of CKD progression and delays the onset of end-stage renal disease in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. SONAR also aims to establish whether the enrichment of patients based on their initial "surrogate" response to atrasentan will deliver a trial design in accord with personalized treatment of diabetic kidney disease.

Longitudinal Assessment of the Effect of Atrasentan on Thoracic Bioimpedance in Diabetic Nephropathy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Fluid retention is a common adverse event in patients who receive endothelin (ET) receptor antagonist therapy, including the highly selective ETA receptor antagonist, atrasentan. OBJECTIVE: We performed longitudinal assessments of thoracic bioimpedance in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and nephropathy to determine whether a decrease in bioimpedance accurately reflected fluid retention during treatment with atrasentan. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in 48 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and nephropathy who were receiving stable doses of renin angiotensin system inhibitors and diuretics. METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to placebo, atrasentan 0.5 mg, or atrasentan 1.25 mg once daily for 8 weeks. Thoracic bioimpedance, vital signs, clinical exams, and serologies were taken at weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8, with the exception of serum hemoglobin, which was not taken at week 1, and serum brain natriuretic peptide, which was only taken at baseline, week 4, and week 8. RESULTS: Alterations in bioimpedance were more often present in those who received atrasentan than in those who received placebo, though overall differences were not statistically significant. Transient declines in thoracic bioimpedance during the first 2 weeks of atrasentan exposure occurred before or during peak increases in body weight and hemodilution (decreased serum hemoglobin). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that thoracic bioimpedance did not reflect changes in weight gain or edema with atrasentan treatment in this study. However, the sample size was small, and it may be of interest to explore the use of thoracic bioimpedance in a larger population to understand its potential clinical use in monitoring fluid retention in patients with chronic kidney disease who receive ET receptor antagonists.

Comparison of exposure response relationship of atrasentan between North American and Asian populations.

AIMS: The selective endothelin (ET) A receptor antagonist atrasentan has been shown to lower albuminuria in North American and Asian patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. As drug responses to many drugs may differ between North American and Asian populations, we assessed the influence of geographical region on the albuminuria and fluid retention response to atrasentan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two 12-week double-blind randomised controlled trials were performed with atrasentan 0.75 or 1.25 mg/d vs placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. The efficacy endpoint was the percentage change in albuminuria. Bodyweight change, a proxy of fluid retention, was used as a safety endpoint. Pharmacodynamics were determined in Asians (N = 77) and North Americans (N = 134). Atrasentan plasma concentration was measured in 161 atrasentan-treated patients. RESULTS: Mean albuminuria reduction in Asian, compared to North American, patients was, respectively, -34.4% vs -26.3% for 0.75 mg/d ( P = .44) and -48.0% vs -28.9% for 1.25 mg/d ( P = .035). Bodyweight gain did not differ between North American and Asian populations. Atrasentan plasma concentrations were higher in Asians compared to North Americans and correlated with albuminuria response (7.2% albuminuria reduction per doubling atrasentan concentration; P = .024). Body surface area (ß = -1.09 per m2 ; P < .001) and bilirubin, as a marker of hepatic organic anion transporter activity, (ß = 0.69 per mg/dL increment; P = .010) were independent determinants of atrasentan plasma concentration; correction by body surface area and bilirubin left no significant difference in plasma concentration between Asian and North American populations. CONCLUSION: The higher exposure and albuminuria reduction of atrasentan in Asian patients is not associated with more fluid retention, suggesting that Asian patients are less sensitive to atrasentan-induced sodium retention.

The effects of atrasentan on urinary metabolites in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy.

We assessed the effect of atrasentan therapy on a pre-specified panel of 13 urinary metabolites known to reflect mitochondrial function in patients with diabetic kidney disease. This post-hoc analysis was performed using urine samples collected during the RADAR study which was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that tested the effects of atrasentan on albuminuria reduction in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. At baseline, 4 of the 13 metabolites, quantified by gas-chromatography mass spectrometry, were below detectable levels, and 6 were reduced in patients with eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 . After 12 weeks of atrasentan treatment in patients with eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 , a single-value index of the metabolites changed by -0.31 (95%CI -0.60 to -0.02; P = .035), -0.08 (-12 to 0.29; P = .43) and 0.01 (-0.21 to 0.19; P = .913) in placebo, atrasentan 0.75 and 1.25 mg/d, respectively. The metabolite index difference compared to placebo was 0.13 (-0.17 to 0.43; P = .40) and 0.35 (0.05-0.65; P = .02) for atrasentan 0.75 and 1.25 mg/d, respectively. These data corroborate previous findings of mitochondrial dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes, nephropathy and eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 , suggesting that atrasentan may prevent the progression of mitochondrial dysfunction common to this specific patient population. Future studies of longer treatment duration with atrasentan are indicated.

Prediction of the effect of atrasentan on renal and heart failure outcomes based on short-term changes in multiple risk markers.

BACKGROUND: A recent phase II clinical trial (Reducing Residual Albuminuria in Subjects with Diabetes and Nephropathy with AtRasentan trial and an identical trial in Japan (RADAR/JAPAN)) showed that the endothelin A receptor antagonist atrasentan lowers albuminuria, blood pressure, cholesterol, hemoglobin, and increases body weight in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. We previously developed an algorithm, the Parameter Response Efficacy (PRE) score, which translates short-term drug effects into predictions of long-term effects on clinical outcomes. DESIGN: We used the PRE score on data from the RADAR/JAPAN study to predict the effect of atrasentan on renal and heart failure outcomes. METHODS: We performed a post-hoc analysis of the RADAR/JAPAN randomized clinical trials in which 211 patients with type-2 diabetes and nephropathy were randomly assigned to atrasentan 0.75 mg/day, 1.25 mg/day, or placebo. A PRE score was developed in a background set of completed clinical trials using multivariate Cox models. The score was applied to baseline and week-12 risk marker levels of RADAR/JAPAN participants, to predict atrasentan effects on clinical outcomes. Outcomes were defined as doubling serum creatinine or end-stage renal disease and hospitalization for heart failure. RESULTS: The PRE score predicted renal risk changes of -23% and -30% for atrasentan 0.75 and 1.25 mg/day, respectively. PRE scores also predicted a small non-significant increase in heart failure risk for atrasentan 0.75 and 1.25 mg/day (+2% vs. +7%). Selecting patients with >30% albuminuria reduction from baseline (responders) improved renal outcome to almost 50% risk reduction, whereas non-responders showed no renal benefit. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the RADAR/JAPAN study, with short-term changes in risk markers, atrasentan is expected to decrease renal risk without increased risk of heart failure. Within this population albuminuria responders appear to contribute to the predicted improvements, whereas non-responders showed no benefit. The ongoing hard outcome trial (SONAR) in type 2 diabetic patients with >30% albuminuria reduction to atrasentan will allow us to assess the validity of these predictions.

Predictors of Atrasentan-Associated Fluid Retention and Change in Albuminuria in Patients with Diabetic Nephropathy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Endothelin A receptor antagonists (ERAs) decrease residual albuminuria in patients with diabetic kidney disease; however, their clinical utility may be limited by fluid retention. Consequently, the primary objective of this study was to identify predictors for ERA-induced fluid retention among patients with type 2 diabetes and CKD. A secondary objective was to determine if the degree of fluid retention necessarily correlated with the magnitude of albuminuria reduction in those patients receiving ERAs. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: A post hoc analysis was conducted of the phase IIb atrasentan trials assessing albuminuria reduction in 211 patients with type 2 diabetes, urine albumin/creatinine ratios of 300-3500 mg/g, and eGFRs of 30-75 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) who were randomly assigned to receive placebo (n=50) or atrasentan 0.75 mg/d (n=78) or 1.25 mg/d (n=83) for 12 weeks. Changes in body weight and hemoglobin (Hb) after 2 weeks of treatment were used as surrogate markers of fluid retention. RESULTS: Baseline predictors of weight gain after 2 weeks of atrasentan treatment were higher atrasentan dose, lower eGFR, higher glycated hemoglobin, higher systolic BP, and lower homeostatic metabolic assessment product. Higher atrasentan dose and lower eGFR also predicted decreases in Hb. There were no changes in B-type natriuretic peptide. There was no correlation between reduction in albuminuria after 2 weeks of atrasentan treatment and changes in body weight or Hb. CONCLUSIONS: In the Reducing Residual Albuminuria in Subjects With Diabetes and Nephropathy With Atrasentan/JAPAN trials, atrasentan-associated fluid retention was more likely in patients with diabetes and nephropathy who had lower eGFR or received a higher dose of atrasentan. Finding that albuminuria reduction was not associated with changes in body weight and Hb suggests that the albuminuria-reducing efficacy of atrasentan is not impaired by fluid retention.

The endothelin antagonist atrasentan lowers residual albuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy.

Despite optimal treatment, including renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors, patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy have high cardiorenal morbidity and mortality related to residual albuminuria. We evaluated whether or not atrasentan, a selective endothelin A receptor antagonist, further reduces albuminuria when administered concomitantly with maximum tolerated labeled doses of RAS inhibitors. We enrolled 211 patients with type 2 diabetes, urine albumin/creatinine ratios of 300-3500 mg/g, and eGFRs of 30-75 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) in two identically designed, parallel, multinational, double-blind studies. Participants were randomized to placebo (n=50) or to 0.75 mg/d (n=78) or 1.25 mg/d (n=83) atrasentan for 12 weeks. Compared with placebo, 0.75 mg and 1.25 mg atrasentan reduced urine albumin/creatinine ratios by an average of 35% and 38% (95% confidence intervals of 24 to 45 and 28 to 47, respectively) and reduced albuminuria≥30% in 51% and 55% of participants, respectively. eGFR and office BP measurements did not change, whereas 24-hour systolic and diastolic BP, LDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels decreased significantly in both treatment groups. Use of atrasentan was associated with a significant increase in weight and a reduction in hemoglobin, but rates of peripheral edema, heart failure, or other side effects did not differ between groups. However, more patients treated with 1.25 mg/d atrasentan discontinued due to adverse events. After stopping atrasentan for 30 days, measured parameters returned to pretreatment levels. In conclusion, atrasentan reduced albuminuria and improved BP and lipid spectrum with manageable fluid overload-related adverse events in patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy receiving RAS inhibitors.

A multicenter, open-label, observational study of testosterone gel (1%) in the treatment of adolescent boys with klinefelter syndrome or anorchia.

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and clinical outcomes of 6-month treatment with testosterone gel 1% therapy in adolescent boys with primary hypogonadism resulting from Klinefelter syndrome (KS) or anorchia. METHODS: This was a subgroup analysis of a multicenter, open-label study of adolescent boys (N = 86) with delayed puberty who received .5-5.0 g testosterone gel 1% daily for ≤6 months. Adolescent boys 12-17 years of age with KS (n = 21) or anorchia (n = 8), bone age ≥10.5 years, and baseline growth data ≥6 months were included in this analysis. Serum hormone levels (total/free testosterone, luteinizing hormone, dihydrotestosterone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and estradiol) were measured using validated assays. Safety was assessed through adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: At baseline, patients with KS were taller, weighed more, and had higher total testosterone levels (mean 174 vs. 19 ng/dL) than patients with anorchia. At 6 months, total and free testosterone and dihydrotestosterone levels increased 1.8- to 2.3-fold in the KS group and eight- to 10-fold in anorchia patients. Estradiol levels increased 1.9-fold in the anorchia group and 1.4-fold in the KS group after treatment. No clinically significant changes were noted for luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and sex hormone-binding globulin concentrations in either group. Cough was the most common AE (eight of 29), followed by acne and headache (both four of 29). One anorchia and two KS patients discontinued prematurely. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily testosterone gel application increased serum testosterone levels into the pubertal range and maintained pubertal testosterone levels during 6-month treatment. In this study, testosterone gel 1% raised testosterone levels and was associated with cough as the most common AE.

One-year efficacy and safety study of a 1.62% testosterone gel in hypogonadal men: results of a 182-day open-label extension of a 6-month double-blind study.

INTRODUCTION: A new formulation of testosterone gel (1.62% testosterone gel) with increased viscosity and reduced volume of application has been shown to be safe and efficacious after 182 days of use in a phase 3, double-blind study in adult hypogonadal males. AIM: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the 1.62% testosterone gel after daily application to the skin in a 182-day (6-month) open-label extension of the initial 182-day double-blind study. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-three subjects, aged 26 to 77 years, continued on active (Continuing Active subjects) 1.62% testosterone gel for the remainder of the study (364 days total). In 28 subjects who had previously received placebo (Formerly Placebo subjects), the dose was titrated to normal levels of serum total testosterone (300-1,000 ng/dL). Dose adjustments for both groups were allowed at specific visits to maintain serum testosterone within a normal range. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The main outcome measure was the percentage of subjects with serum total testosterone average concentrations (C(av) ) within the normal range at day 364. RESULTS: On day 364, 77.9% (95% confidence interval: 70.0, 84.6) of the Continuing Active subjects and 87.0% (66.4, 97.2) of the Formerly Placebo subjects had C(av) values within the eugonadal range. The 1.62% testosterone gel was safe and well tolerated in this study. CONCLUSION: Treatment with 1.62% testosterone gel for up to 1 year (182 days for the Formerly Placebo subjects, 364 days for the Continuing Active subjects) was safe and efficacious, resulting in >77% of treated subjects achieving normal serum testosterone levels at final visit.

Effect of application site, clothing barrier, and application site washing on testosterone transfer with a 1.62% testosterone gel.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of application site location, clothing barrier, and application site washing on testosterone transfer from males dosed with 1.62% testosterone gel to female partners. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Open-label, randomized, parallel group, crossover study performed in 24 healthy male/female couples. 2.5 or 5.0 g of gel was applied to upper arms and shoulders or abdomens of male subjects. Skin contact occurred 2 hours after gel application between male and female subjects to compare the effect of wearing or not wearing a t-shirt, washing or not washing before contact, and the effect of differing application sites. Treatments were separated by a 1-week washout period. On each dosing day, 15 minutes of supervised skin contact occurred between the dosed male and female partner. Contact was either abdomen to abdomen (male to female), or upper arms/shoulders (male) to upper arms/shoulders, wrists and hands (female), depending on the male application site. Serum samples were collected from females at baseline and after contact to assess secondary testosterone exposure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: C(max) (maximum serum concentration), AUC(0-24) (area under serum concentration-time curve from 0-24 hours), and C(av) (time-averaged concentration over 24-hour post-contact period) were assessed. Subjects were monitored for adverse events. RESULTS: Testosterone exposure (C(av) and C(max)) in females increased by up to 27% (2.5 g) or up to 280% (5.0 g) from baseline after direct skin contact at 2 hours after gel application, although C(av) remained within the female eugonadal range. Transfer from the abdomen was prevented when a t-shirt was worn (2.5-g dose). When the application site was washed before contact, mean C(av) was comparable to baseline, and C(max) was slightly higher (14%). Transfer was higher after direct skin-to-skin contact when the application and contact sites were upper arms/shoulders versus the abdomen. Testosterone concentrations returned to baseline within 48 hours after last skin contact. CONCLUSIONS: There is a risk of testosterone transfer from males using 1.62% testosterone gel to others who come into direct skin contact with the application site. This can be prevented by covering the application site with a t-shirt (2.5-g dose), or washing the application site before contact. STUDY LIMITATIONS: Women for these studies were not selected by menopausal status. The study was conducted under circumstances that were intended to simulate exaggerated conditions of contact and may not represent average contact under normal conditions. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT NUMBERS: Study was not registered (first subject enrolled 28 November 2007).

Serum testosterone levels in non-dosed females after secondary exposure to 1.62% testosterone gel: effects of clothing barrier on testosterone absorption.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate secondary exposure of testosterone transferred to females from a male partner, dosed with 1.62% testosterone gel after direct skin-to-skin contact with the application site, and to investigate the effect of wearing a t-shirt on testosterone transfer. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Across three studies, a total of 72 healthy males applied 5.0 g 1.62% testosterone gel to their abdomen alone, upper arms/shoulders alone, or a combination of their upper arms/shoulders and abdomen (single dose or once daily for 7 days). Male-female contact occurred 2 or 12 hours after testosterone gel application, with males either wearing or not wearing a t-shirt. There were 15 minutes of supervised contact with the application site between the male and his female partner. Blood samples were collected over a 24 hour period in females for assessment of serum testosterone levels at baseline and after contact. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pharmacokinetic parameters included C(max) (maximum serum concentration), AUC(0-24) (area under the serum concentration-time curve from 0-24 hours), and C(av) (time-averaged concentration over the 24-hour period post-contact). Subjects were monitored for adverse events. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT NUMBERS: Study 1 was not registered (first subject enrolled 8 March 2007); Study 2: 00998933; Study 3, 01130298. RESULTS: Testosterone levels (C(av) and C(max)) in females increased 86-185% from baseline after direct abdominal skin contact, although C(av) levels remained within female eugonadal range. Testosterone concentrations returned to baseline within 48 hours after last skin contact. A t-shirt barrier reduced testosterone transfer by approximately 40-48% when 5.0 g of testosterone gel was applied to the abdomen alone. A t-shirt barrier prevented transfer when 5.0 g of testosterone gel was applied to the upper arms and shoulders or to a combination of the upper arms and shoulders and the abdomen (C(max) and C(av) increased by approximately 5-11%). No major safety events were observed during the studies. CONCLUSIONS: There is a risk of testosterone transfer from males using 1.62% testosterone gel to others who come in contact with the application site for at least 12 hours after application. Secondary exposure can be mitigated by means of a t-shirt barrier. STUDY LIMITATIONS: Women for these studies were not selected by menopausal status. The study designs were intended to simulate exaggerated conditions of transfer.

Effects of skin washing on systemic absorption of testosterone in hypogonadal males after administration of 1.62% testosterone gel.

OBJECTIVE: The impact of washing on the pharmacokinetics, systemic absorption and residual testosterone on the skin after application of a 1.62% testosterone gel was investigated in an open-label, randomized, three-way crossover study in hypogonadal men. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty-four hypogonadal men (total testosterone <300 ng/dL) applied 5 g of 1.62% gel (81 mg testosterone) once daily to the shoulders/upper arms for 7 days during each of three consecutive treatment periods. On the 7th dosing day of each period, the skin was washed (soap/water) at one of the following times: 2, 6, or 10 hours post-dose. Pharmacokinetic serum samples were collected at baseline, and on days 6 (no washing) and 7 (with washing) of each treatment period. Skin stripping for determination of residual testosterone was also performed on days 6 and 7. A single location on the application site was stripped a total of 10 times. Testosterone was extracted from the tape strips using ethanol, and concentrations were determined using high performance liquid chromatography with diode array detection (HPLC-UV). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Testosterone C(max), AUC(0-24), average concentration over the dosing interval (C(av)), and safety were assessed. RESULTS: Washing at 2 and 6 hours caused a 10-14% decrease in AUC(0-24) and C(av), but not C(max). Washing 10 hours after gel application had no effect on C(max), AUC(0-24), or C(av). Skin washing decreased the mean amount of testosterone remaining on the skin surface by at least 81%. CONCLUSIONS: Washing the site of gel application as soon as 2 hours after application had little impact on bioavailability and was effective in reducing residual testosterone on the skin. This finding may be important to prevent secondary transfer. STUDY LIMITATIONS: The experimental conditions using uniform timing and procedures for dose administration and washing may not fully reflect real world circumstances. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT NUMBERS: Study was not registered (first subject enrolled 22 December 2006).

Pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of absorbed testosterone after administration of a 1.62% testosterone gel to different application sites in men with hypogonadism.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the pharmacokinetics, bioavailability, and safety of a new formulation (1.62%) of testosterone gel that produces eugonadal serum testosterone levels with use of a lower amount of gel than the currently available 1% gels. METHODS: In an open-label, randomized, 3-way crossover study, 36 male patients with hypogonadism applied 5 g of 1.62% testosterone gel (81 mg of testosterone) once daily to the abdomen, to the upper arms/shoulders, or alternating between both sites per an established schedule for 7 days. Serum levels of testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, and estradiol were measured and used to compare the pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of the 3 treatments. RESULTS: Each application method produced average serum testosterone concentrations within the eugonadal range (300 to 1,000 ng/dL), and steady-state testosterone concentrations were achieved after 2 days of gel application to either the abdomen or the upper arms/shoulders. When testosterone gel was applied to the abdomen, approximately 30% to 40% lower bioavailability (based on area under the serum concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 hours) was observed in comparison with application to the upper arms/shoulders. The 1.62% testosterone gel was found to be safe and well tolerated in men with hypogonadism. CONCLUSION: Although lower testosterone bioavailability was observed after abdominal application of 1.62% testosterone gel in comparison with application to the upper arms/shoulders, application to either site yielded eugonadal levels of serum testosterone.

Efficacy and safety study of 1.62% testosterone gel for the treatment of hypogonadal men.

INTRODUCTION: Male hypogonadism is a significant and growing problem that can be successfully treated with testosterone replacement therapy. A new formulation of testosterone gel (1.62%) was developed with increased viscosity, reduced volume of application, and increased skin permeation compared with other currently available testosterone gels. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of titrated doses of 1.62% testosterone gel after daily application to the skin of hypogonadal men for 182 days. METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in hypogonadal men (234 active; 40 placebo), 18 to 80 years of age with average serum total testosterone concentrations <300 ng/dL and prostate-specific antigen <2.5 ng/mL. Topical testosterone gel (1.62%), 1.25 g, 2.5 g, 3.75 g, and 5.0 g, or placebo gel was applied once daily to either upper arms/shoulders or abdomen. Dose adjustments were made on days 14, 28, and 42. Main Outcome Measures. The percentage of subjects with serum total testosterone average concentrations (C(av) ) within the normal range of 300-1,000 ng/dL on study days 14, 56, 112, and 182. RESULTS: Following titration, significantly (P < 0.0001) more subjects receiving active treatment had testosterone C(av) values (range 81.6% to 82.5%) within the eugonadal range compared with placebo (range 28.6% to 37.0%) on all study days. The 1.62% gel was safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, treatment with 1.62% testosterone gel was safe and efficacious, resulting in an acceptable percentage of hypogonadal males achieving eugonadal serum testosterone levels.

Combined esterified estrogens and methyltestosterone versus esterified estrogens alone in the treatment of loss of sexual interest in surgically menopausal women.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of esterified estrogens and methyltestosterone versus esterified estrogens alone on diminished sexual interest in surgically menopausal women. DESIGN: This randomized, double-blind study compared the effect of combined esterified estrogens (1.25 mg) and methyltestosterone (2.5 mg) (EE/MT) versus esterified estrogens (1.25 mg) alone (EE) for 8 weeks. Several different sexual function questionnaires were used to measure response to therapy. Changes from baseline in sexual interest/function and hormone levels were evaluated after 4 and 8 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 102 women were randomized into the study; 52 (age range, 32-61 years) to EE/MT and 50 (age range, 33-62 years) to EE. After 8 weeks, significant differences between treatments were not seen in the Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (CSFQ-F-C) sexual desire/interest subscale score, the primary efficacy variable. In contrast statistically significant between-treatment differences were found for several secondary efficacy variables including Menopausal Sexual Interest Questionnaire (MSIQ) sexual interest/desire score, CSFQ-F-C arousal/erection subscale score and Women's Health Questionnaire sexual functioning subscale score. The mean serum concentration of bioavailable and free testosterone significantly increased, approximately doubling between baseline and the end of the study in patients receiving EE/MT, with a significant (P < 0.001) between-treatment difference. The mean serum concentration of sex hormone-binding globulin significantly decreased to less than one third of the pretreatment levels in patients receiving EE/MT (P < 0.001). Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The mixed results seen with the different sexual function questionnaires may be due to the CSFQ-F-C's lack of specificity for this population. Increased levels of bioavailable and free testosterone paralleled the improved MSIQ item scores. Both the EE and EE/MT treatments were well tolerated.