The effect of metrics-based feedback on acquisition of sonographic skills relevant to performance of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block.

The objective of this study was to examine the effect of metrics-based vs. non-metrics-based feedback on novices learning predefined competencies for acquisition and interpretation of sonographic images relevant to performance of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block. Twelve anaesthetic trainees were randomly assigned to either metrics-based-feedback or non-metrics-based feedback groups. After a common learning phase, all participants attempted to perform a predefined task that involved scanning the left axilla of a single volunteer. Following completion of the task, all participants in each group received feedback from a different expert in regional blocks (consultant anaesthetist) and were allowed to practise the predefined task for up to 1 h. Those in the metrics-based feedback group received feedback based on previously validated metrics, and they practised each metric item until it was performed satisfactorily, as assessed by the supervising consultant. Subsequently, each participant attempted to perform ultrasonography of the left axilla on the same volunteer. Two trained consultant anaesthetists independently scored the video recording pre- and post-feedback scans using the validated metrics list. Both groups showed improvement from pre-feedback to post-feedback scores. Compared with participants in the non-metrics-based feedback group, those in the metrics-based feedback group completed more steps: median (IQR [range]) 18.8 (1.5 [17-20]) vs. 14.3 (4.5 [11-18.5]), p = 0.009, and made fewer errors 0.5 (1 [0-1.5]) vs. 1.5 (2 [1-6]), p = 0.041 postfeedback. In this study, novices' sonographic skills showed greater improvement when feedback was combined with validated metrics.

Construct validity of a novel assessment tool for ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block.

The purpose of this study was to examine the construct validity and reliability of a novel metrics-based assessment tool, previously developed for ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block. Five expert and eight novice anaesthetists performed a total of 18 ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blocks on the same number of patients. A trained investigator video-taped procedures according to a pre-defined protocol. Two trained consultant anaesthetists independently scored the videos using the assessment tool. Compared with novices, experts completed more steps (mean 41.0 vs. 33.1, p = 0.001), had fewer procedural errors (2.8 vs. 7.9, p < 0.0001), had fewer critical errors (0.8 vs. 1.3, p = 0.030), and fewer total errors (3.5 vs. 9.1, p < 0.0001). The mean inter-rater reliability for scoring of experts' performance was 0.91, for novices' performance was 0.84, and for all performance combined (n = 18) was 0.88. This assessment tool is valid, and discriminates reliably between expert and novice performance for placement of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blocks.

Inadvertent subclavian artery cannulation with a central venous catheter; successful retrieval using a minimally invasive technique.

A 48-year-old lady was referred to our department as an emergency following an unsuccessful attempt at central venous catheter insertion, resulting in cannulation of the subclavian artery. She underwent angiography with removal of the catheter and closure of the arteriotomy using an Angio-Seal device. While the optimal management of this scenario has yet to be defined, the use of this minimally invasive technique warrants consideration.

Radiographic appearance of a post-epidural headache.

We report the case of a 35-year-old lady who presented with a 6-day history of a postural headache following an uncomplicated epidural catheter insertion. Meningitis was initially suspected and a neurology review was obtained. CT and MRI brain revealed features suggestive of meningitis. However these radiological features are also consistent with post dural puncture headache (PDPH). This case highlights the under reported and possible misleading radiographical features of PDPH.

Manual versus target-controlled infusions of propofol.

Target-controlled infusion systems have been shown to result in the administration of larger doses of propofol, which may result in delayed emergence and recovery from anaesthesia. The aim of this study was to investigate if this was due to a difference in the depth of hypnosis (using the bispectral index monitoring) between the manual and target controlled systems of administration. Fifty unpremedicated patients undergoing elective surgery were randomly allocated to have their anaesthesia maintained with manual or target-controlled propofol infusion schemes. In both groups, the rate of propofol administration was adjusted according to standard clinical criteria while bispectral index scores were recorded by an observer not involved in the delivery of anaesthesia. The total dose of propofol used was higher in the target controlled group (mean 9.9 [standard deviation 1.6] compared with 8.1 [1.0] mg.kg(-1).h(-1) in the manual group [p < 0.0001]). The times to emergence and recovery end-points were comparable between the two groups. The difference in the total dosage of propofol was mainly due to higher rate of propofol administration in the first 30 min in the target controlled infusion group. The bispectral index scores were lower in the target controlled group during this time, being significantly so over the first 15 min of anaesthesia. We conclude that propofol administration by a target controlled infusion system results in the administration of higher doses of propofol and lower bispectral index values mainly in the initial period of anaesthesia.

Variability in determination of point of needle insertion in peripheral nerve blocks: a comparison of experienced and inexperienced anaesthetists.

Accurate identification of surface landmarks is essential for the successful performance of peripheral nerve blocks. The variability between experienced and inexperienced practitioners in identifying anatomical landmarks has not been studied previously. Anaesthetists were asked to identify the point of needle insertion for posterior lumbar plexus and sciatic nerve blocks on a volunteer using a standard textbook description. The chosen point for needle insertion was described in terms of X and Y co-ordinates, measured in millimetres, from a zero reference point marked on a volunteer's back. Fifteen experienced and 22 inexperienced anaesthetists took part in the study. The lumbar plexus block mean [range] values for the X, Y co-ordinates were 80 [62-108], 66 [46-86] and 92 [49-150], 62 [0-131] in the experienced and inexperienced groups, respectively. The sciatic nerve block X, Y co-ordinates were 77 [62-99], 70 [49-89] and 68 [29-116], 62 [26-93] in the experienced and inexperienced groups, respectively. The variance for the point of needle insertion was significantly greater in the inexperienced group (p <0.01) for both the lumbar plexus and sciatic nerve blocks. We conclude that with increasing experience, there is decreased variability in determining the point of needle insertion using anatomical landmarks.

The use of remifentanil in the anaesthetic management of patients undergoing adrenalectomy: a report of three cases.

The use of remifentanil has been recommended because of its ability to minimise the hypertensive response to tracheal intubation and surgical stimulation in various types of surgery. We describe the use of remifentanil in the anaesthetic management of three cases of open adrenalectomy, two for removal of a phaeochromocytoma and one for removal of an adrenal cortical tumour. Although the use of remifentanil was associated with no adverse events in the patient undergoing resection of the adrenal cortical tumour, its administration was associated with significant hypotension and bradycardia in the two phaeochromocytoma patients, who had both been given alpha- and beta-adrenergic receptor blocking drugs before surgery. It did not prevent the increases in blood pressure or plasma catecholamine levels associated with tumour manipulation in these patients. Remifentanil should therefore be used with caution in patients receiving alpha- and beta-adrenergic receptor blocking drugs. The use of potent vasodilators may still be necessary during tumour manipulation even if remifentanil is being infused.

Use of methoxamine in the resuscitation of epinephrine-resistant electromechanical dissociation.

We describe three cases of electromechanical dissociation under anaesthesia that were unresponsive to doses of intravenous epinephrine given according to current Advanced Life Support guidelines, but which responded immediately to the intravenous administration of the pure alpha agonist, methoxamine. We suggest a possible mechanism to explain this finding and review the literature on vasopressor drugs used for cardiopulmonary resuscitation during electromechanical dissociation. An intravenous alpha agonist, such as methoxamine 20 mg, should be considered for any case of cardiac arrest secondary to electromechanical dissociation which is unresponsive to epinephrine given according to current guidelines.

Recovery from propofol anaesthesia supplemented with remifentanil.

We have examined the effects on recovery end-points of supplementation of a propofol-based anaesthetic with remifentanil. After induction of anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil 1.0 microg kg(-1), 15 patients each were randomly allocated to target plasma propofol concentrations of 2, 3, 4 or 5 microg ml(-1) for maintenance of anaesthesia. Remifentanil was administered by infusion for supplementation in doses required for maintenance of adequate anaesthesia. All patients received 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen and ventilation was controlled. The total amount of drugs used and times to different recovery end-points were recorded. Cognitive function was also assessed using a Mini-Mental State questionnaire. The median dose of remifentanil for maintenance of adequate anaesthesia (excluding the initial bolus dose) in the four groups was 0.21, 0.15, 0.11 and 0.13 microg kg(-1) min(-1) respectively (P=0.0026). The median times to eye opening and orientation were shortest in the 2 microg ml(-1) group [6.0 and 6.5 min, 8.5 and 10.8 min, 13.4 and 15.8 min, and 14.2 and 19.5 min respectively in the propofol 2, 3, 4, and 5 microg ml(-1) groups respectively (P<0.001)]. The times to discharge from the recovery ward and the Mini-Mental State scores were not significantly different.

Frequency of haemoglobin desaturation with the use of succinylcholine during rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia.

BACKGROUND: The perceived safety of the use of succinylcholine is based on the fact that recovery from its effects will occur before oxygen desaturation occurs in case of failure to intubate or ventilate. The purpose of this study was to examine the incidence of oxygen desaturation after the use of succinylcholine prior to resumption of spontaneous ventilation following four different preoxygenation techniques. METHODS: Twenty-five patients each were randomly allocated to preoxygenation with 4 deep breaths of 100% oxygen or by breathing oxygen for 1, 3 or 5 min following which they received a rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia with fentanyl 1 microg kg(-1), a sleep dose of thiopentone and succinylcholine 1 mg kg(-1). Oxygen saturation was monitored continuously using a finger probe. Ventilation was not assisted unless the saturation decreased to

Neostigmine antagonism of rocuronium block during anesthesia with sevoflurane, isoflurane or propofol.

PURPOSE: To examine the influence of continuing administration of sevoflurane or isoflurane during reversal of rocuronium induced neuromuscular block with neostigmine. METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients, divided into three equal groups, were randomly allocated to maintenance of anesthesia with sevoflurane, isoflurane or propofol. Neuromuscular block was induced with rocuronium and monitored using train-of-four (TOF) stimulation of the ulnar nerve and recording the force of contraction of the adductor pollicis muscle. Neostigmine was administered when the first response in TOF had recovered to 25%. At this time the volatile agent administration was stopped or propofol dosage reduced in half the patients in each group (n = 20 in each group). The times to attain TOF ratio of 0.8, and the number of patients attaining this end point within 15 min were recorded. RESULTS: The times (mean +/- SD) to recovery of the TOF ratio to 0.8 were 12.0 +/- 5.5 and 6.8 +/- 2.3 min in the sevoflurane continued and sevoflurane stopped groups, 9.0 +/- 8.3 and 5.5 +/- 3.0 min in the isoflurane continued and isoflurane stopped groups, and 5.2 +/- 2.8 and 4.7 +/- 1.5 min in the propofol continued and propofol stopped groups (P < 0.5-01). Only 9 and 15 patients in the sevoflurane and isoflurane continued groups respectively had attained a TOF ratio of 0.8 within 15 min (P < 0.001 for sevoflurane). CONCLUSIONS: The continued administration of sevoflurane, and to a smaller extent isoflurane, results in delay in attaining adequate antagonism of rocuronium induced neuromuscular block.

Postoperative residual block after intermediate-acting neuromuscular blocking drugs.

The frequency and duration of postoperative residual neuromuscular block on arrival of 150 patients in the recovery ward following the use of vecuronium (n = 50), atracurium (n = 50) and rocuronium (n = 50) were recorded. Residual block was defined as a train-of-four ratio of <0.8. An additional group of 10 patients received no neuromuscular blocking drugs during anaesthesia. The incidence of postoperative residual neuromuscular block was 64%, 52% and 39% after the use of vecuronium, atracurium and rocuronium, respectively. Similar numbers of patients were not able to maintain a sustained head or leg lift for 5 s on arrival in the recovery ward. The mean [range] times to attaining a train-of-four ratio of > or =0.8 after arrival in the recovery ward were 9.2 [1-61], 6.9 [1-24] and 14.7 [1.5-83] min for vecuronium, atracurium and rocuronium, respectively. None of the 10 patients who did not receive neuromuscular blocking drugs had train-of-four ratios <0.8 on arrival in the recovery ward. It is concluded that a large proportion of patients arrive in the recovery ward with a train-of-four ratio <0.8, even with the use of intermediate-acting neuromuscular blocking drugs. Although the residual block is relatively short lasting, it may occasionally be prolonged, requiring close observation and monitoring of such patients in the recovery ward.

Sevoflurane--nitrous oxide anaesthesia supplemented with remifentanil: effect on recovery and cognitive function.

The aim of this study was to compare recovery and psychomotor performance after maintenance of anaesthesia with sevoflurane or sevoflurane supplemented with remifentanil. Sixty-six per cent nitrous oxide was used in all patients. Twenty patients each were randomly allocated to maintenance of anaesthesia with sevoflurane only in concentrations necessary to maintain adequate anaesthesia or with 1.5, 1.0 or 0.5 MAC (end-tidal) of sevoflurane supplemented with remifentanil. The median dosage of remifentanil required in the last three groups was 0.21, 0.25 and 0.34 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1), respectively (p < 0.05). The median times to eye opening were 10.3, 12.7, 11.0 and 6.5 min in the four groups (p < 0.05 between the 0.5 MAC and the other groups) and for orientation 12.1, 14.9, 12.3 and 8.3 min, respectively (p < 0.05 between 0.5 and 1.5 MAC groups). There was no significant difference in the mini-mental state assessment scores or the actual discharge times from the recovery ward among the groups. Significantly greater numbers of patients could perform the critical flicker fusion test at 15 min in the group receiving the lowest concentration of sevoflurane and the highest dosage of remifentanil (p < 0.05). Patients in this group also showed the highest incidence of chest wall rigidity (p < 0.003). We conclude that, while the use of remifentanil with lower concentrations of sevoflurane facilitates early recovery, it does not influence discharge time from recovery ward and may be associated with side-effects such as chest wall rigidity.

Comparison of recovery following rapacuronium, with and without neostigmine, and succinylcholine.

The neuromuscular blocking effects of a single dose of rapacuronium 1.5 mg x kg(-1) with or without reversal with neostigmine have been examined in the present study and compared with a dose of succinylcholine 1.0 mg x kg(-1). Neuromuscular block was measured mechanomyographically using train-of-four stimulation. Complete block occurred within 1 min with both agents. Twenty-five per cent recovery of the first response of the train-of-four occurred in a median [range] time of 7.6 [5.7-11.3] min in the succinylcholine group and in 14.2 [8.8-23.6] and 15.1 [9.6-23.4] min in the rapacuronium groups with and without neostigmine reversal, respectively. Spontaneous recovery to a train-of-four ratio of 0.8 took 33.4 [20.0-79.0] min with rapacuronium but this was reduced to about 21.2 [13.9-33.7] min when neostigmine was administered at 25% recovery of first twitch of the train-of-four.

Anaesthesia in myotubular (centronuclear) myopathy.

A patient with a known history of myotubular myopathy presented for surgery for insertion of a tibial nail. Anasthesia was induced and maintained using an intravenous anasthetic technique. Neuromuscular function was assessed using mechanomyography, which showed a profound reduction in muscle contractility. In view of this, the use of muscle relaxants was avoided altogether. Nerve conduction was normal but electromyography showed small motor units, with generalised distribution, suggesting mild to moderately severe myopathy. The patient made a slow but uneventful recovery.