To develop, implement and evaluate an integrated care pathway for patients presenting with pneumothorax.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Pneumothorax is a common presentation to acute healthcare services in Ireland, however there is wide variation in management approaches between centres. There is robust evidence to demonstrate that ambulatory management of pneumothorax is feasible and safe. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the implementation of an integrated care pathway (ICP) for pneumothorax patients with a focus on ambulatory care would be economically beneficial for the healthcare system. METHODS: This study developed, implemented and evaluated an ICP for all patients presenting with pneumothorax, with a specific focus on ambulatory management for suitable patients. The ICP was designed to be utilised in the Irish healthcare setting, and was evaluated using a prospective multi-centre observational study, with a rigorous economic analysis at the centre of study design. MAIN FINDINGS: Implementation of the ICP resulted in a statistically significant reduction in inpatient length of stay of 2.84 days from 7.4 to 4.56 days (p = 0.001). The incremental per patient cost reduction of treating a patient according to the pneumothorax ICP was 2314 euro. There were no adverse events related to drain insertion at the study sites. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates therefore that standardisation of care for pneumothorax patients with a focus on ambulatory management are economically beneficial for the publicly-funded healthcare service. It is envisaged that this work will be used to inform healthcare policy at a national level across Ireland.

EFSUMB Clinical Practice Guidelines for Point-of-Care Ultrasound: Part One (Common Heart and Pulmonary Applications) SHORT VERSION.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the evidence and produce a summary and recommendations for the most common heart and lung point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS). METHODS: We reviewed 10 clinical domains/questions related to common heart and lung applications of PoCUS. Following review of the evidence, a summary and recommendations were produced, including assigning levels of evidence (LoE) and grading of recommendation, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE). 38 international experts, the expert review group (ERG), were invited to review the evidence presented for each question. A level of agreement of over 75 % was required to progress to the next section. The ERG then reviewed and indicated their level of agreement of the summary and recommendation for each question (using a 5-point Likert scale), which was approved in the case of a level of agreement of greater than 75 %. A level of agreement was defined as a summary of "strongly agree" and "agree" on the Likert scale responses. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: One question achieved a strong consensus for an assigned LoE of 3 and a weak GRADE recommendation (question 1), the remaining 9 questions achieved broad agreement with an assigned LoE of 4 and a weak GRADE recommendation (question 2), three achieved an LoE of 3 with a weak GRADE recommendation (questions 3-5), three achieved an LoE of 3 with a strong GRADE recommendation (questions 6-8) and the remaining two were assigned an LoE of 2 with a strong GRADE recommendation (questions 9 and 10). CONCLUSION: These consensus-derived recommendations should aid clinical practice and highlight areas of further research for PoCUS in acute settings.

EFSUMB Clinical Practice Guidelines for Point-of-Care Ultrasound: Part One (Common Heart and Pulmonary Applications) LONG VERSION.

AIMS: To evaluate the evidence and produce a summary and recommendations for the most common heart and lung applications of point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS). METHODS: We reviewed 10 clinical domains/questions related to common heart and lung applications of PoCUS. Following review of the evidence, a summary and recommendation were produced, including assignment of levels of evidence (LoE) and grading of the recommendation, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE). 38 international experts, the expert review group (ERG), were invited to review the evidence presented for each question. A level of agreement of over 75 % was required to progress to the next section. The ERG then reviewed and indicated their level of agreement regarding the summary and recommendation for each question (using a 5-point Likert scale), which was approved if a level of agreement of greater than 75 % was reached. A level of agreement was defined as a summary of "strongly agree" and "agree" on the Likert scale responses. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: One question achieved a strong consensus for an assigned LoE of 3 and a weak GRADE recommendation (question 1). The remaining 9 questions achieved broad agreement with one assigned an LoE of 4 and weak GRADE recommendation (question 2), three achieving an LoE of 3 with a weak GRADE recommendation (questions 3-5), three achieved an LoE of 3 with a strong GRADE recommendation (questions 6-8), and the remaining two were assigned an LoE of 2 with a strong GRADE recommendation (questions 9 and 10). CONCLUSION: These consensus-derived recommendations should aid clinical practice and highlight areas of further research for PoCUS in acute settings.

Implementation of a chest injury pathway in the emergency department.

Rib fractures represent a substantial health burden. Chest injuries contribute to 25% of deaths after trauma and survivors can experience long-standing consequences, such as reduced functional capabilities and loss of employment. Over recent years, there has been an increase in the awareness of the importance of early identification, aggressive pain management and adequate safety netting for patients with chest injuries. Substandard management leads to increased rates of morbidity and mortality. The development of protocols in the emergency department (ED) for management of patients with chest wall injuries has demonstrated reduction of complication rates.Our aim was to develop an evidence-based, multidisciplinary chest injury pathway for the management of patients presenting with rib injury to our ED.Prior to implementation of the pathway in our department, only 39% of patients were documented as having received analgesia and only 7% of discharged patients had documented written verbal advice. There was no standardised method to perform regional anaesthetic blocks. Using quality improvement methods, we standardised imaging modality, risk stratification with a scoring system, analgesia with emphasis on regional anaesthesia blocks and disposition with information leaflets for those discharged.Implementation of the pathway increased rates of documented analgesia received from 39% to 70%. The number of regional anaesthetic blocks performed went from 0% to 60% and the number of patients receiving discharge advice went from 7% to 70%. Compliance of doctors and nurses with the pathway was 63%.Our previous audits showed substandard management of patients with chest injuries in our department. Through this quality improvement project, we were able to improve the quality of care provided to patients attending with rib fractures by increasing rate of analgesia received, regional blocks performed and discharge advice given.

Diagnosing Paget-Schroetter Syndrome Using Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS).

Paget-Schroetter Syndrome, or effort thrombosis, is a relatively rare disorder. It refers to axillary-subclavian vein thrombosis (ASVT) that is associated with strenuous and repetitive activity of the upper extremities 1. Anatomical abnormalities at the thoracic outlet and repetitive trauma to the endothelium of the subclavian vein are key factors in its initiation and progression. Doppler ultrasonography is the preferred initial test, but contrast venography is the gold standard for diagnosis 1, 2. Early diagnosis coupled with a multimodal treatment strategy is crucial for optimal outcomes. We present a case of a 21-year-old male in which point of care ultrasound (POCUS) expedited the diagnosis and subsequent early treatment of right subclavian vein thrombosis. He presented to our Emergency Department with acute swelling, pain and erythema of his right upper limb. He was promptly diagnosed to have thrombotic occlusion of the right subclavian vein using POCUS in our Emergency Department.

Implementation of an acute DVT ambulatory care pathway in a large urban centre: current challenges and future opportunities.

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory management of isolated acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is the recommended standard of care in selected populations. However, in practice a significant number of patients continue to be managed as in-patients. OBJECTIVES: In this study we aimed to evaluate acute DVT treatment pathways in our emergency department (ED) in practice and to identify barriers to outpatient management. METHODS: This study was a cross-sectional analysis of prospectively collected data pertaining to consecutive patients presenting to the ED of a large, city center, academic teaching hospital over a 46 week period who were diagnosed with DVT. RESULTS: Implementation of an outpatient care pathway led to the majority of patients presenting with DVT in our institution being treated without hospital admission. Forty percent (31/78) of patients with DVT were treated with a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) as an outpatient in line with international best practice guidelines. CONCLUSION: The study provides a clear picture of the clinical profile and management of patients in clinical practice. Due to the lack of resources and supported infrastructure it is difficult to effectively implement outpatient venous thromboembolism (VTE) management to its full potential. Directing resources towards strategies which facilitate outpatient DVT treatment among vulnerable patient groups could represent a means of reducing hospital admissions for DVT in urban centers. Our study highlights the success and clinical limitations of the outpatient treatment model, which should become standard as part of wider VTE care.

Venous thromboembolism incidence in the Ireland east hospital group: a retrospective 22-month observational study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and the incidence of hospital-acquired VTE (HA-VTE) arising within the population served by the Ireland East Hospital Group (IEHG). DESIGN: /home/user/Documents/Sathish Kumar G/RFO/June/21-06-2019/bmjopen_iss_9_7_20190621_1/ A retrospective observational study was conducted using hospital discharge data obtained from the hospital inpatient enquiry data reporting system. In this system, VTE events recorded as 'primary diagnosis' represented the reason for initial hospital admission, whereas VTE recorded as a 'secondary diagnosis' occurred following admission and were therefore used as an approximation of HA-VTE. These data were used to estimate the overall incidence of VTE and the proportion of these events which were hospital-acquired. SETTING: The IEHG is the largest hospital group in the Irish healthcare system and serves a population of over 1 million individuals. PARTICIPANTS: Data were generated from records pertaining to the 2727 patient admission episodes where a diagnosis of VTE was made during the 22-month study period. RESULTS: During the study period, 2727 VTE events were recorded within the IEHG (which serves a population of 1 036 279) corresponding to an incidence of 1.44 (95% CI 1.36 to 1.51) per 1000 per annum. 1273 (47%) of VTE events were recorded as secondary VTE. The incidence of VTE was highest among individuals over 85 years of age (16.03 per 1000;95% CI 12.81 to 19.26) and was more common following emergency hospital admission. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that HA-VTE accounts for at least 47% of all VTE events arising within a hospital group serving a population of over 1 million individuals within the Ireland. Given that HA-VTE is a well-recognised source of (potentially preventable) hospital deaths, these findings provide a compelling argument for prioritising strategies directed at reducing the risk of VTE among hospital patients served by the IEHG and within the Ireland as a whole.

Screening for Malignancy in Patients With Unprovoked Venous Thromboembolism: A Single-Center Retrospective Case Series.

In this prospective review of cancer screening in unselected patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) presenting to a large teaching hospital in the Republic of Ireland, we aimed to determine the effects of the implementation of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence screening policy in a "real-world" population. Within our institution, 64 individuals presented with unprovoked VTE during the study period, of whom 47 underwent a screening computed tomography (CT) scan. Two cases of previously undiagnosed cancer were identified. However, in both cases, the clinical history provided by the affected individuals would have prompted a CT scan regardless of the recommendations of the screening policy. The screening CT scans identified 18 incidental lesions within the cohort, which required further diagnostic studies. None of the additional investigations completed to date have detected any lesion of clinical significance. These findings support the view that cancer screening with CT imaging in unselected individuals with unprovoked VTE is not justified or cost-effective.

Bleeding Risk, Management and Outcome in Patients Receiving Non-VKA Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs).

Modern direct-acting anticoagulants are rapidly replacing vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in the management of millions of patients worldwide who require anticoagulation. These drugs include agents that inhibit activated factor X (FXa) (such as apixaban and rivaroxaban) or thrombin (such as dabigatran), and are collectively known today as non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs). Since bleeding is the most common and most dangerous side effect of long-term anticoagulation, and because NOACs have very different mechanisms of action and pharmacokinetics compared with VKA, physicians are naturally concerned about the lack of experience regarding frequency, management and outcome of NOAC-associated bleeding in daily care. This review appraises trial and registry (or "real-world") data pertaining to bleeding complications in patients taking NOACs and VKA and provides practical recommendations for the management of acute bleeding situations.

Malarial cases presenting to a European urban Emergency Department.

INTRODUCTION: Malaria accounts for approximately 225 million infections and 781 000 deaths annually worldwide. Malaria should be considered in the Emergency Department as an important cause of illness in returning travellers. We were interested in evaluating the malarial caseload presenting to an urban inner city Emergency Department in terms of the nature and severity of clinical presentations. METHODS: A retrospective study of all cases of malaria presenting to our Emergency Department from 1 January 2004 to the 31 December 2010 was conducted. Information about patient demographics, areas in which malaria was contracted, clinical course, treatment and complications was recorded from chart reviews. RESULTS: Fifty-six cases of malaria were diagnosed in the period studied. The majority of patients had falciparum malaria (80%), were originally from West or Central Africa (75%), were mainly from Nigeria (48%), and were visiting friends and relatives in their country of origin. A total of 79% had not taken appropriate antimalarial chemoprophylaxis. A total of 7% were classified as severe malaria according to the WHO criteria. There was one death. CONCLUSION: Malarial cases occurred predominantly in immigrants who were returning to endemic areas to visit friends and relatives in their country of origin. The majority of patients did not undergo antimalarial prophylaxis. Severe malaria is a medical emergency requiring urgent recognition and appropriate antimicrobial and critical care therapy. Improving public awareness and healthcare promotion regarding risks of travel-related malaria may help to improve compliance with prophylaxis and preventative measures, and thereby reduce the prevalence of malarial infection in this group.

Increasing wait times predict increasing mortality for emergency medical admissions.

BACKGROUND: The actual impact of emergency department (ED) 'wait' time on hospital mortality in patients admitted as a medical emergency has often been debated. We have evaluated the impact of such waits on 30-day mortality, for all medical patients over a 7-year period. METHODS: All patients admitted as medical emergencies by the ED between 2002 and 2008 were studied; we looked at the impact of time to medical referral and subsequent time to a ward bed on any inhospital death within 30 days. Significant univariate predictors of outcome, including Charlson's comorbidity and acute illness severity score, were entered into a multivariate regression model, adjusting the univariate estimates of the readmission status on mortality. RESULTS: We studied 23 114 consecutive acute medical admissions between 2002 and 2008. The triage category in the ED was highly predictive of subsequent 30-day mortality ranging from 4.8 (category 5) to 46.1% (category 1). After adjustment for all outcome predictors, including comorbidity and illness severity, both door-to-team and team-to-ward times were independent predictors of death within 30 days with respective odds ratios of 1.13 (95% confidence interval 1.07-1.18), and 1.07 (95% confidence interval 1.02-1.13). CONCLUSION: Delay to admission have been shown to be independently adversely related to mortality outcome. We recommend maximal target limits of 4 and 6 h for referrals and admissions, respectively, based on these mortality observations.

Stress in an Irish inner city emergency department revisited (2000-2006).

OBJECTIVES: Stress levels among staff in the Mater Misericordiae University Hospital Emergency Department were studied by questionnaire in 2000, which demonstrated a high level of self reported stress. The aim of this study was to ascertain if stress levels had reduced following changes in the department. METHOD: The study was repeated using the same questionnaire in 2006, after changes had occurred. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in the percentage of staff that reported they were under severe or unbearable stress, from 37% in 2000 to 10% in 2006 (p = 0.002). A total of 60% felt the social environment of their work was satisfactory in 2006 compared to 40% in 2000 (p = 0.03). Compared to 2000, a significantly lower proportion reported they had a low degree of control over their job, and a significantly higher proportion reported a medium level of control over their job in 2006 (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the results of the previous study, reported stress levels have reduced overall, which coincided with a significant increase in staffing levels in the department.

Evaluation of a new needle catching instrument for suturing simple wounds in the Emergency Department.

OBJECTIVES: The Needlecatcher comprises a tissue forceps at one end, with a 'piston and barrel' system, which acts as a needle grasper, at the other end of the instrument. It minimizes exposure of the needle during suturing, potentially reducing risk of injury. We evaluate its effect on operator safety during simple wound closure. METHODS: Video analysis of 10 clinicians (six junior doctors and four advanced nurse practitioners) closing a standard simulated wound using their normal technique was performed. They were trained in the use of the Needlecatcher, and used it for 10 weeks closing simple wounds in the Emergency Department. Video analysis of wound closure was repeated, using the new instrument. Clinicians filled out a questionnaire for each episode of wound closure, which assessed how they perceived their safety was affected by the device. RESULTS: Video analysis of clinicians showed that the needle was secured in an instrument and thus unexposed for an average of 60% of the duration of the procedure by standard technique, compared with 95% using the Needlecatcher, with a change of 35% [95% confidence interval (CI): 14-58%, P = 0.005]. Episodes where the needle was grasped by an operator's finger were reduced by 50% (95% CI: 15-85%, P = 0.028). In the questionnaire study of 53 episodes of wound closure, operators perceived their safety to be increased in 38 (71.7%, 95% CI: 66.2-77.2%) episodes, were neutral in 10, and felt their safety was reduced in five. CONCLUSION: The Needlecatcher showed the potential to reduce the risk of needlestick injury while suturing.