Neoadjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer surgery: is it always worth it?

BACKGROUND: Surgeons perspective of breast cancer (BC) treatment has deeply changed in recent time. We investigated survival outcomes of BC patients who underwent Neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NAT) before surgery and to assess the role of NAT in determining possible prognosis. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a total of 2372 BC patients consecutively enrolled in our prospective institutional database. Seventy-eight patients over 2372 reached the inclusion criteria and underwent surgery after NAT. RESULTS: After NAT, the 50% of luminal-B-HER2+ and the 53% of HER2+ had a pathological complete response (pCR) and only 18.5% of the TNs had a pCR. NAT significantly changed lymph node status (P=0.05). All women with pCR are still alive (No-pCR 0.732 CI: 0.589-0.832; yes-pCR 1.000 CI: 1.00-1.00; P=0.02). The molecular biology of the tumor, after NAT, is strictly related to survival both for 3- and 5-years OS. A triple negative BC have the worst prognosis (HER2+ 0.796 CI: 0.614-1; Luminal-A: 1 CI:1-1; LuminalB-HER2 -: 0.801 CI: 0.659-0975; LuminalB-HER2+: 1 CI:1-1; TN 0.542 CI: 0.372-0789, P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: We can state that, based on our experience, we can consider safe and effective conservative interventions following neoadjuvant therapy. An adequate selection of patients is crucial. It is also clear how the planning of the therapeutic path plays a key role in an interdisciplinary context. NAT is a source of hope for the future both for the identification of new predictors of prognosis and in the field of research, for the development of new drugs.

The Added Value of Intraoperative Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging in Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Bile duct injury is a major complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Intraoperative cholangiogram is useful, but faster techniques are available to assist the surgeon, like near-infrared fluorescent cholangiography (NIFC) with indocyanine green (ICG). The aim of our study is to evaluate the usefulness of NIFC during LC. This is a retrospective study conducted on prospectively recorded data of the General Surgery department of Trieste Academic Hospital, Italy. All patients underwent elective LC from January 2016 to January 2020. Patients were randomly divided in 2 groups: in one group, only white light imaging was used (n = 98 patients), in the NIFC group (n = 63) ICG was used. NIFC has been chosen more frequently by residents than consultants (P = .002). Operative time and length of stay resulted shorter in ICG group (P = .002 and .006), and this group showed also fewer intraoperative complications (P = .007). NIFC does not require any learning curve and makes surgery faster and safer.