Spleen-preserving pancreatectomy with removal of splenic vessels: impact on splenic parenchyma ?

BACKGROUND: While outcomes after spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SP-DP) have been widely reported, impacts on splenic parenchyma have not been well studied. This study aimed to compare postoperative outcomes, particularly spleen-related outcomes, by assessing splenic imaging after SP-DP with or without splenic vessels removal. METHODS: Data for all patients who underwent SP-DP with splenic vessels removal (Warshaw technique, WDP) or preservation (Kimura technique, KDP) between 2010 and 2022 in two tertiary centres were retrospectively analysed. Splenic ischemia and volume at early/late imaging and postoperative outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients were included, 51 in the WDP and 36 in the KDP groups. Median Charlson's Comorbidity Index was significantly higher in the WDP group compared with the KDP group. Postoperative morbidity was similar between groups. There was more splenic ischemia at early imaging in the WDP group compared to the KDP group (55% vs. 14%, p = 0.018), especially severe ischemia (23% vs. 0%). Partial splenic atrophy was observed in 29% and 0% in the WDP and KDP groups, respectively (p = 0.002); no complete splenic atrophy was observed. Platelet levels at POD 1, 2 and 6 were significantly higher in the WDP group compared to KDP group. At univariate analysis, age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, platelet levels at POD 6, and early splenic infarction were prognostic factors for development of splenic atrophy. No episodes of overwhelming post-splenectomy infection or secondary splenectomy were recorded after a median follow-up of 9 and 11 months in the WDP and KDP groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Splenic ischemia appeared in one-half of patients undergoing SP-DP with splenic vessels removal at early imaging, and partial splenic atrophy in almost 30% at late imaging, without clinical impact or complete splenic atrophy. Age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, platelet levels at POD 6, and early splenic infarction could help to predict the occurrence of splenic atrophy.

Meso-Rex bypass for the management of extrahepatic portal vein obstruction in adults (with video).

BACKGROUND: Extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO) results in severe portal hypertension (PHT) leading to severely compromised quality of life. Often, pharmacological and endoscopic management is unable to solve this problem. Restoring hepatic portal flow using meso-Rex bypass (MRB) may solve it. This procedure, uncommon in adult patients, is considered the treatment of choice for EHPVO in children. METHODS: From 1997 to 2018, 8 male and 6 female adults, with a median age of 51 years (range 22-66) underwent MRB procedure for EHPVO at the University Hospitals Saint-Luc in Brussels, Belgium. Symptoms of PHT were life altering in all but one patient and consisted of repetitive gastro-intestinal bleedings, sepsis due to portal biliopathy, and/or severe abdominal discomfort. The surgical technique consisted in interposition of a free venous graft or of a prosthetic graft between the superior mesenteric vein and the Rex recess of the left portal vein. RESULTS: Median operative time was 500 min (range 300-730). Median follow-up duration was 22 months (range 2-169). One patient died due to hemorrhagic shock following percutaneous transluminal intervention for early graft thrombosis. Major morbidity, defined as Clavien-Dindo score ≥ III, was 35.7% (5/14). Shunt patency at last follow-up was 64.3% (9/14): 85.7% (6/7) of pure venous grafts and only 42.9% (3/7) of prosthetic graft. Symptom relief was achieved in 85.7% (12/14) who became asymptomatic after MRB. CONCLUSIONS: Adult EHPVO represents a difficult clinical condition that leads to severely compromised quality of life and possible life-threatening complications. In such patients, MRB represents the only and last resort to restore physiological portal vein flow. Although successful in a majority of patients, this procedure is associated with major morbidity and mortality and should be done in tertiary centers experienced with vascular liver surgery to get the best results.