Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am Surg ; 88(9): 2170-2175, 2022 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35593894

RESUMO

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the retrograde flow of gastric contents into the distal esophagus and may be treated medically or surgically. Magnetic sphincter augmentation surgery using LINX has recently demonstrated comparable results to Nissen fundoplication. We aimed to evaluate preoperative patient risk factors that were associated with LINX removal rates or postoperative EGD with dilation rates (POEGDD). This is a single institution retrospective review of patients undergoing LINX between 2015 and 2021. One hundred and twelve patients were reviewed, 106 included within the study; those excluded had prior foregut surgery or device fracture. Variables including age, sex, BMI, size of device, DeMeester score, manometry, GERD Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD HRQL) questionnaires, POEGDD, and removal rates were recorded. Comparing removal and dilation status, the chi-square or Fisher's exact test and the Mann-Whitney U test were used to analyze categorical and continuous variables, respectively. A P < .05 was considered to be statistically significant. Eleven LINX devices were removed (10%); of these, 9 (81%) underwent POEGDD (P = .0023). There was no difference in DeMeester scores, size of device, or BMI in patients requiring LINX removal compared to those not removed or POEGDD rates. Patients who required LINX removal had higher GERD HRQL scores both preoperatively (median 34 vs 28) and postoperatively at all visits compared to those patients who did not undergo removal (P = .032). Manometry and DeMeester scores were not associated with LINX removal suggesting a less invasive GERD HRQL questionnaire may be a better predictor of patients who will succeed with LINX surgery.


Assuntos
Refluxo Gastroesofágico , Laparoscopia , Esfíncter Esofágico Inferior/cirurgia , Fundoplicatura/métodos , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/complicações , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/cirurgia , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Am Surg ; 87(1): 105-108, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32833496

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There are approximately 44 180 new cases of rectal cancer diagnosed annually. While surgical resection remains the standard of care for definitive treatment, neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (NCRT) has significantly reduced recurrence rates postoperatively. NCRT is indicated for T3/T4 tumors, and relative indications include patients with T1/T2 lesions with clinically positive nodes. While this remains the standard of care, all patients may not receive equal treatment for their rectal cancer depending on various healthcare disparities. We aimed to discover how insurance status affected rectal cancer patients' time of diagnosis to treatment, age of diagnosis, and overall vitality. METHODS: A single-center retrospective chart and cancer registry review was performed for all patients diagnosed with rectal cancer of any stage between 2011 and 2018. A total of 94 rectal cancer patients were included in the analysis. Age, race, sex, insurance status, vitality, and grade were assessed. Time in days of diagnosis to the time of first treatment (neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiation) was measured. Continuous variables were reported as means and SDs or medians and interquartile ranges and were analyzed with the unpaired t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test. Categorical variables were reported as frequencies and percentages and were analyzed with Fisher's exact test. Statistical significance was determined with a P < .05. All analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). RESULTS: Total race breakdown was as follows: white (61%), African-American (30%), and other (3%). There was no statistically significant difference in diagnosis time to first treatment in the uninsured versus insured groups (P = .9). There was a statistically significant difference in the age of diagnosis with insured mean age of 60.9 years and uninsured mean age of 52.4 years (P = .0080). There was no statistically significant difference in survival between the 2 groups (P = .54). For those who went onto have surgery, there was no difference in the median number of lymph nodes harvested between the 2 groups (P = .73). CONCLUSION: Insurance status did not affect timing to treatment or survival. Uninsured patients had a younger age of diagnosis by approximately 8 years on average. Uninsured patients received the same quality surgeries as uninsured patients in regard to lymph node harvests.


Assuntos
Cobertura do Seguro , Seguro Saúde , Neoplasias Retais/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Retais/terapia , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Gradação de Tumores , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Protectomia , Neoplasias Retais/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Tempo para o Tratamento , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med ; 3(4): 383-386, 2019 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31763594

RESUMO

Acute acalculous cholecystitis (AAC) is a rare, potentially serious disease that has been associated with Kawasaki disease (KD) in children. Studies suggest that patients presenting with severe abdominal symptoms secondary to KD have increased resistance to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), and a higher rate of coronary artery aneurysms. We describe an eight-year-old boy who presented to the emergency department with severe abdominal pain and was diagnosed with AAC and KD. He was treated with IVIG and high-dose aspirin, achieving good response with complete symptom resolution. He had no coronary artery aneurysms or further complications and was discharged after three days.

4.
Am Surg ; 85(8): 800-805, 2019 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32051066

RESUMO

Older adults account for an increasing percentage of trauma patients and have worse outcomes when compared with younger populations. Simple prediction tools are needed to designate risk categories among these patients. The Geriatric Trauma Screening Tool (GTST) was developed to risk stratify older adults admitted to the ICU at a Level 1 trauma center. One hundred fifty patients aged ≥ 65 years were prospectively screened for high-risk (HR) injuries, comorbidities, and prehospital function using the GTST. Patients who screened for HR were more likely to have an unfavorable disposition than non-HR patients. HR patients had significantly longer ICU and hospital length of stays when compared with non-HR patients. In addition, patients with prior functional impairment were at higher risk for an unfavorable discharge disposition than their counterparts. Implementation of the GTST predicted discharge disposition in geriatric trauma patients admitted to the ICU. Pre-injury functional status was a better predictor of discharge disposition than either the types of HR injuries or the presence of comorbidities. Risk stratification of geriatric trauma patients allows for early engagement of patients and caregivers regarding transitions of care as well as more efficient utilization of hospital resources.


Assuntos
Atividades Cotidianas , Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Alta do Paciente , Medição de Risco/métodos , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Moradias Assistidas/estatística & dados numéricos , Bengala , Comorbidade , Escolaridade , Feminino , Humanos , Vida Independente/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Casas de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Centros de Traumatologia , Viagem , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...