Impact of Delay in Surgery on Outcome in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Revascularisation Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of critical coronary artery disease, including after acute coronary syndrome presentation (ACS), represents an important indication for early coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. The study aims to investigate the influence of time from diagnosis to CABG on outcomes and document barriers to early revascularisation. METHODS: All patients 18 years and older with an acute presentation due to ACS or critical coronary artery disease who were considered to require urgent inpatient cardiac surgery between January 2016-February 2019 were included in the study. The primary endpoints were 30-day all-cause mortality or readmission, 1-year all-cause mortality, all-cause readmission. The secondary endpoint was the rate of complications while waiting for surgery. The time duration between diagnostic coronary angiography and surgery was considered as the time interval. RESULTS: Of 266 eligible patients, 251 underwent surgical revascularisation with 15 (6%) not undergoing surgery due to preoperative complications (n=12) or due to perceived prohibitively high surgical risk (n=3). The majority (85%) were male (mean age 67 years), 37% of patients had diabetes and 71% had hypertension. Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction was documented in 51% of the patients. The median time between diagnosis and inpatient CABG was 7 days (IQR 5-11). Thirty-five per cent (35%) of patients experienced complications while awaiting surgery. Of the 266 patients, 140 patients (53% - cohort 1) underwent surgery within 7 days. The cohort 1 rate of complications was lower than in cohort 2 (surgery after 7 days) (24 vs 47%, p<0.001). Moreover, 1-year mortality was less in cohort 1 (2 vs 8%, p=0.029). CONCLUSION: In patients requiring urgent inpatient CABG, delay for more than 7 days is associated with a higher rate of in-hospital complications and worse 30 day and 12-month outcomes.

Effect of the gluten-free diet on cardiovascular risk factors in patients with coeliac disease: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A gluten-free diet (GFD), the mainstay of treatment for celiac disease, is being increasingly adopted by people without this condition. The long-term health effects of this diet, apart from its beneficial effect on enteropathy in celiac disease, are unclear. Concerns exist that the GFD may result in micronutrient deficiencies, increased exposure to toxins such as arsenic, and an increased cardiovascular risk. This systematic review addresses the effect of the GFD on several modifiable cardiovascular risk factors. METHODS: A systematic search of the literature addressing the GFD and blood pressure, glycaemia, body mass index, waist circumference, and serum lipids in patients before and after adoption of a GFD was conducted using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, PSYCInfo, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases. Two authors performed abstract and full text screening, and quality assessment. RESULTS: A total of 5372 articles were identified, from which 27 were included. Lack of control groups in all but one study prevented meta-analysis of results. Overall study quality was low and restricted to patients with celiac disease. Consistent findings across studies included an increase in total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein, fasting glycaemia, and body mass index (while remaining within the healthy weight range). Significant changes in low density lipoprotein, triglycerides, and blood pressure were not consistently reported. CONCLUSIONS: A GFD alters certain cardiovascular risk factors in patients with celiac disease, but the overall effect on cardiovascular risk is unclear. Further studies are warranted.

Prognostic Value of LVEDP in Acute Myocardial Infarction: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) is an easily obtained, physiologically integrative measure of total LV function. LVEDP may be a useful prognostic measure in patients with acute myocardial infarction and utilised to guide medical therapy and assess risk for post myocardial infarction heart failure. To assess the utility of LVEDP as a prognostic measure in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction. We performed an unrestricted search of electronic databases (1946 to March 2017) using a predefined search strategy. Publications were included if patients had an acute coronary syndrome and LVEDP was measured by cardiac catheterisation and included outcome data specifying major adverse cardiac events. Two reviewers performed independent study selection, data abstraction and quality assessment by using the Cochrane tool for randomised trials and the ROBINS-I tool for non-randomised studies. Our search identified 8637 patients in seven studies. In patients with elevated LVEDP and STEMI, there was a significantly increased risk of 30-day death (three studies, 5372 participants; RR 1.9; 95% CI 1.4-2.7; p < 0.001; I 2 = 35.3%) and heart failure (two studies, 2574 participants; RR 2.9; 95% CI 1.9-4.5; p = < 0.001; I 2 = 0.0%). There was no significant increase in risk of 30 day reinfarction (RR 1.25; 95% CI 0.77-2.1; p = 0.37; I 2 = 41.3%). Elevated LVEDP measured during cardiac catheterisation for acute myocardial infarction appears to be a predictor of heart failure and mortality.