Cysts and tumors of the jaws treated by marsupialization: A description of 4 clinical cases.

Since the 4th edition of the World Health Organization's Classification of Head and Neck Tumours was published in January of 2017, the keratocystic odontogenic tumor is back into the cyst category as odontogenic keratocyst (OKC). Depending on the size of the cyst, its location and the patients' age, several treatment options are available: curettage, enucleation, radical treatment and marsupialization. The marsupialization is a conservative technique used in early tumor stages, as curative treatment for the odontogenic cyst. Despite its disadvantages and controversies, the marsupialization remains an interesting therapeutic choice in the case of large cysts, or in very young or old patients. We describe, in this article, four clinical cases of odontogenic cysts. We report the surgical management and the subsequent evolution of the patients. The discussion focuses on the indications, advantages and limitations of the odontogenic cyst's marsupialization. We review the specific conditions of the odontogenic cysts that could make the marsupialization the optimal therapeutic option. In our cases, the marsupialization proved to be a conservative technique which allowed the respect of neighboring anatomical structures, particularly in the case of large cysts, but requires prolonged clinical and radiological monitoring. Pathological entity for our cases was different. Thus, the treatment outcome may be different too. This series is very small and the reader should be cautious about drawing broad conclusions regarding the optimal therapeutic choice. Key words:Marsupialization, odontogenic cyst.

Microsurgical reconstruction of the jaw with fibular grafts and implants.

Reconstructive treatments for jaw defects are complex procedures that can combine multiple techniques including fibula free flap (FFF) grafting. The purpose of this retrospective study was to document and share our experience on mandibular and maxillar reconstruction with FFF followed by secondary dental rehabilitation using implant insertion.We reviewed 198 patients treated by FFF grafting for mandibular and/or maxillary defects in our department during the past 11 years (1996-2007). A selection of 30 patients (18 males and 12 females, mean age of 46 y) with adequate criteria (hygiene, motivation, and prognosis) received secondary placement of osseointegrated implants. The implant success was clinically and radiographically evaluated.A total of 105 osseointegrated implants were placed in the grafted fibulas 5 months to 3 years after the reconstruction surgery. Only 4 implants were lost because of peri-implantitis (3 patients) and fibular fracture (1 patient); this corresponds to a 96.2% implant success rate.During the mean follow-up of 76 months, patient's satisfaction and functional and aesthetic results were evaluated. Radiologic findings indicated a low crest resorption around the implants despite an unfavorable crown-to-root ratio.The main difficulties in the reconstructions were lack of FFF height, absence of a vestibular groove, limitation of mouth opening, skin paddle thickness, and the reconstruction of surrounding tissues including the lip. Our management strategy is discussed.Prosthetic choice is fundamental to achieving patient-specific solutions. The prostheses used included sealed or screwed bridge, resin-bonded bridge, tooled bar, implant-borne denture, or implant-stabilized dentures. Dental implants may be used even in situations involving an unfavorable crown-to-root ratio and implant position by using milled bar and overdenture. The FFF provides a consistent bone graft that allows a reliable and predictable restoration with dental implants, leading to a satisfactory functional and aesthetic restoration.