The Dog as a Second Species for Toxicology Testing Provides Value to Drug Development.

The objective of the pharmaceutical industry is to develop new drugs that are safe for human use. In many cases, the accepted approach codified in guidance from regulatory authorities to assess the nonclinical safety profile of potential pharmaceuticals is to perform toxicity testing in two species. However, the use of a second species to establish the safety of new pharmaceuticals has been the subject of much scrutiny in recent years and the industry has been repeatedly challenged to reduce, refine, or replace some or all of the animals used to establish the safety of these pharmaceutical candidates. Specifically, the value of the dog in this testing paradigm has been questioned. Publications reviewing available data for marketed drugs suggest that for many drugs, the dog does not identify unique toxicities critical to human safety. The weakness of this approach, however, is that many of the cases where the dog (or any other species) has the greatest impact on drug development are cases for which development decisions based on safety concerns are not shared publicly. The European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA) Preclinical Development Expert Group (PDEG) decided to share case studies collected from its membership and the literature to illustrate the value of the dog in drug development decision-making and clinical monitoring practices to protect the safety of trial subjects.

Evaluation of Cell Proliferation in Rat Mammary Glands Is Not Predictive of the Carcinogenic Potential of Insulin In Vivo.

For nonclinical safety-assessment of insulin analogues in vivo, mitogenic effects are compared to that of human insulin. Besides histopathologic evaluation, this usually includes assessment of cell proliferation (CP) in mammary glands. Insulin analogue X10 is recommended as positive control, due to its known carcinogenic effect in rat mammary glands. Here, we discuss the mitogenic effect of insulin in vivo and use of X10 as positive control. We present results from 4 nonclinical rat studies evaluating effects of repeated dosing with insulin detemir (≤26 weeks) or degludec (52 weeks) in mammary glands. Studies included human insulin-dosed groups as comparators, CP, and histopathologic evaluation. One study included an X10-dosed group (26 weeks), another ≤3 weeks of dosing with X10 or human insulin evaluating effects of these comparators. Neither human insulin, insulin detemir, degludec, nor X10 induced mammary tumors or increased CP in the studies. The CP marker proliferating cell nuclear antigen varied within/between studies and was not correlated with the remaining markers or CP fluctuations during estrous cycle, whereas the other CP markers, Ki-67 and 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU), correlated with estrous cycle changes and each other. In conclusion, we propose that the mitogenic effect of insulin in rat mammary glands is weak in vivo. Cell proliferation evaluation in nonclinical safety assessment studies is not predictive of the carcinogenic potential of insulin, thus, the value of including this end point is debatable. Moreover, X10 is not recommended as positive control, due to lack of proliferative effects. Typical CP markers vary greatly in quality, BrdU seemingly most reliable.

Generalized cellular hypertrophy is induced by a dual-acting PPAR agonist in rat urinary bladder urothelium in vivo.

Some developmental dual-acting PPARalpha/gamma agonists, such as ragaglitazar, have shown carcinogenic effects in the rodent urinary bladder urothelium after months-years of dosing. We examined early (precancerous) changes in the bladder urothelium of rats orally dosed with ragaglitazar, using a newly developed flow cytometric method. Following 3 weeks of oral ragaglitazar dosing, increases in physical size occurred in a generalized fashion in rat bladder urothelial cells, determined by flow cytometry. Protein/DNA measurements confirmed increased protein content of urothelial cells in the bladder, and hypertrophy was observed in the kidney pelvis urothelium by histopathology. In animals exhibiting urothelial hypertrophy, no cell cycle changes were detected in parallel samples of bladder urothelium. Interestingly, urothelial cells from normal rats were found to constitute a unique type of noncycling population, with high G2/M fractions. In summary, our findings showed that in the urothelium of ragaglitazar-treated animals, hypertrophy (increased size and protein content per cell) was an early change, that affected the whole bladder urothelial cell population. The urothelial hypertrophy was primary, i.e., occurred in the absence of similarly pronounced changes in cell cycle distributions. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a direct hypertrophic effect of a PPAR agonist. Urothelial hypertrophy might be a relevant early biological endpoint in mechanistic studies regarding the bladder-carcinogenic effect of PPAR agonists.