Outcomes of Heart Transplant Donation After Circulatory Death.

BACKGROUND: Heart transplantation using donation after circulatory death (DCD) allografts is increasingly common, expanding the donor pool and reducing transplant wait times. However, data remain limited on clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare 6-month and 1-year clinical outcomes between recipients of DCD hearts, most of them recovered with the use of normothermic regional perfusion (NRP), and recipients of donation after brain death (DBD) hearts. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective observational study of all adult heart-only transplants from January 2020 to January 2023. Recipient and donor data were abstracted from medical records and the United Network for Organ Sharing registry, respectively. Survival analysis and Cox regression were used to compare the groups. RESULTS: During the study period, 385 adults (median age 57.4 years [IQR: 48.0-63.7 years]) underwent heart-only transplantation, including 122 (32%) from DCD donors, 83% of which were recovered with the use of NRP. DCD donors were younger and had fewer comorbidities than DBD donors. DCD recipients were less often hospitalized before transplantation and less likely to require pretransplantation temporary mechanical circulatory support compared with DBD recipients. There were no significant differences between groups in 1-year survival, incidence of severe primary graft dysfunction, treated rejection during the first year, or likelihood of cardiac allograft vasculopathy at 1 year after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: In the largest single-center comparison of DCD and DBD heart transplantations to date, outcomes among DCD recipients are noninferior to those of DBD recipients. This study adds to the published data supporting DCD donors as a safe means to expand the heart donor pool.

Efficacy of bortezomib desensitization among heart transplant candidates.

Allosensitization is prevalent in heart transplant candidates and is associated with prolonged waiting times and poor outcomes following transplantation. We analyzed the efficacy of a desensitization regimen consisting of plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin, and bortezomib among 25 consecutive sensitized waitlisted candidates at our center from 2016 to 2021. Following desensitization therapies, all C1q negative antibodies were removed from a candidate's unacceptable antigen list. There was a significant decrease in the median number of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I (21-15, p = .001) but not class II antibodies (7-6.5, p = .07). There was a significant corresponding decrease in median calculated panel reactive antibodies for class I (90%-74%, p = .004) but not class II (74.5%-75.5%, p = .30). Following desensitization, 76% of patients were transplanted at a median of 91 days. One-year survival following transplant was 89% with a 33% rate of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). In conclusion, a bortezomib desensitization protocol was modestly effective for class I antibodies and allowed successful transplant in most cases when combined with selective crossing of C1q negative antigens.

Impact of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibition on morbidity and mortality during long-term continuous-flow left ventricular assist device support: An IMACS report.

BACKGROUND: Inhibition of the renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) improves survival and reduces adverse cardiac events in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, but the benefit is not well-defined following left ventricular assist device (LVAD). METHODS: We analyzed the ISHLT IMACS registry for adults with a primary, continuous-flow LVAD from January 2013 to September 2017 who were alive at postoperative month 3 without a major adverse event, and categorized patients according to treatment an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI/ARB) or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA). Propensity score matching was performed separately for ACEI/ARB vs none (n = 4,118 each) and MRA vs none (n = 3,892 each). RESULTS: Of 11,494 patients included, 50% were treated with ACEI/ARB and 38% with MRA. Kaplan-Meier survival was significantly better for patients receiving ACEI/ARB (p < 0.001) but not MRA (p = 0.31). In Cox proportional hazards analyses adjusted for known predictors of mortality following LVAD, ACEI/ARB use (hazard ratio 0.81 [95% confidence interval 0.71-0.93], p < 0.0001) but not MRA use (hazard ratio 1.03 [95% confidence interval 0.88-1.21], p = 0.69) was independently associated with lower mortality. Among patients treated with an ACEI/ARB, there was a significantly lower unadjusted risk of cardiovascular death (p < 0.001), risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (p = 0.01), and creatinine level (p < 0.001). MRA therapy was associated with lower risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (p = 0.01) but higher risk of hemolysis (p < 0.01). Potential limitations include residual confounding and therapy crossover. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest a benefit for ACEI/ARB therapy in patients with heart failure after LVAD implantation.

Pulmonary Artery Pressure Monitoring Effectively Guides Management to Reduce Heart Failure Hospitalizations in Obesity.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the impact of therapy guided by pulmonary artery (PA) pressure monitoring in patients with heart failure (HF) and obesity. BACKGROUND: Obesity is prevalent in HF and associated with volume retention, but it complicates clinical assessment of congestion. METHODS: The CardioMEMS Post Approval Study was a prospective, multicenter, open-label trial in 1,200 patients with New York Heart Association functional class III HF and prior HF hospitalization (HFH) within 12 months. Patients with a body mass index (BMI) >35 kg/m2 were required to have a chest circumference <65 inches. Therapy was guided by PA pressure monitoring at sites, and HFHs were adjudicated 1 year before implantation and throughout follow-up. This analysis stratified patients according to ejection fraction (EF) <40% or ≥40% and by BMI <35 kg/m2 or ≥35 kg/m2. RESULTS: Baseline PA diastolic pressure was higher in patients with BMI ≥35 kg/m2 regardless of EF, but all PA pressures were reduced at 12 months in each cohort (P < 0.0001). HFH rate was reduced by >50% in both cohorts for EF <40% (BMI <35 kg/m2 [HR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.41-0.55] and ≥35 kg/m2 [HR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.31-0.53]) and EF ≥40% (BMI <35 kg/m2 [HR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.35-0.52] and ≥35 kg/m2 [HR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.25-0.45]; P < 0.0001). There was a nonsignificant trend toward greater reduction with more obesity. The all-cause hospitalization rate was also significantly reduced during monitoring (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Management guided by PA pressure monitoring effectively reduced pressures, HFH, and all-cause hospitalization in patients with obesity regardless of EF. (CardioMEMS HF System Post Approval Study; NCT02279888).

Minimum inhibitory concentration changes in relapsed left ventricular assist device driveline infections.

Driveline infection is the most common infectious complication in patients with left ventricular assist devices. Minimum inhibitory concentration changes are not well described in relapsed driveline infections. This retrospective descriptive epidemiology study of patients with left ventricular assist device implantation between January 1, 2013, and August 1, 2017, who developed driveline infection with positive cultures aimed to describe minimum inhibitory concentration changes. Of the 330 patients underwent left ventricular assist device implantation, 30 (9%) met criteria for driveline infection. Median duration of follow-up was 26 months (interquartile range 16, 39) and time to first driveline infection was 171 days (interquartile range 83, 403). There were 74 driveline infections: 40 new and 34 relapsed. Staphylococcus aureus was most common in new and relapsed driveline infection. Thirteen patients comprised the 34 relapsed infections, 9 of which experienced a minimum inhibitory concentration change. Median time to first minimum inhibitory concentration change was 56 days (interquartile range 36-88), and type of minimum inhibitory concentration change was an increase in five cases, decrease in two cases, and both increase and decrease in two cases. Minimum inhibitory concentration changes did not result in resistance in S. aureus but did in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Mycobacterium fortuitum relapsed driveline infection. Time to first relapse from initial infection was longer in those who received suppressive therapy, 60 days versus 83 days, p = 0.047. Relapsed driveline infections were most common with S. aureus. Minimum inhibitory concentration changes were quite variable and may not be the major contributor to relapsed infection in gram-positive driveline infection.

Trends in Renal Function Among Heart Transplant Recipients of Donor-Derived Hepatitis C Virus.

Donor-derived hepatitis C (dd-HCV) infection may increase the risk of renal impairment (RI) among heart transplantation (HT) recipients. Sofosbuvir, an integral component of HCV direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) has also been linked to RI. To date, no study has examined the trends in renal function for HT recipients of dd-HCV infection and assessed safety and efficacy of Sofosbuvir-based DAAs. Between September 2016 and June 2018, 46 HCV-naive patients and one patient with a history of HCV treated pretransplant, underwent HT from HCV-positive donors (follow-up available through October 10, 2018). Patients were treated with Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir (genotype 1) or Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir (genotype 3) for 12 or 24 weeks; no dose adjustments were made for renal function. Data on renal function were available for 23 patients who achieved a sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after the treatment (SVR12; cohort A) and 18 patients who completed 1 year of follow-up (cohort B). Treatment of dd-HCV infection was initiated at a median of 6 weeks post-HT. In both cohorts, a nonsignificant reduction in median estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; ml/min/1.73 m) was noted (cohort A: pretransplant eGFR: 62 [interquartile range {IQR}: 1-84] to SVR12 eGFR: 49 [IQR: 37-82]; p = 0.43; cohort B: pretransplant eGFR: 65 [IQR: 54-84] to 1 year post-HT eGFR: 56 [IQR: 39-75]; p = 0.29). Pretreatment renal function had no significant impact on changes in renal function during treatment. All patients tolerated DAAs well with 100% completion rate to the assigned therapy and duration and 100% success at achieving SVR12. In this first and largest reported case series to date of HT recipients with dd-HCV infection, we observed that neither the dd-HCV infection nor its treatment with Sofosbuvir-based DAAs increased the risk of RI. Sofosbuvir-based DAAs appear safe, tolerable, and effective for HCV treatment even in presence of severe RI.

Expanding Heart Transplant in the Era of Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy for Hepatitis C.

Importance: For patients awaiting heart transplant, hepatitis C-positive donors offer an opportunity to expand the donor pool, shorten wait times, and decrease wait-list mortality. While early reported outcomes among few heart transplant recipients have been promising, knowledge of 1-year outcomes in larger cohorts of patients is critical to shared decision-making with patients about this option. Objective: To better define the association of hepatitis C-positive donors with heart transplant volumes, wait-list duration, the transmission and cure of donor-derived hepatitis C, and morbidity and mortality at 1 year. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a prospective, single-center observational study of 80 adult (age 18 years or older) patients who underwent heart transplant using hearts from hepatitis C-positive donors between September 2016 and April 2019 at a large academic medical center. Among donors, who were considered hepatitis C-positive if results from hepatitis C antibody and/or nucleic acid testing were positive, 70 had viremia and 10 were seropositive but did not have viremia. Follow-up was available through May 15, 2019. Comparisons were drawn with patients who underwent transplant with hearts from hepatitis C-negative donors during the same period. Exposures: In addition to standard posttransplant management, transplant recipients who developed donor-derived hepatitis C infection were treated with direct-acting antivirals. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes included wait-list duration and 1-year survival in all patients, and for those who developed donor-derived hepatitis C, the response to direct-acting antiviral treatment. Results: Of 80 patients, 57 (71.3%) were men, 55 (68.7%) were white, and 17 (26.3%) were black; the median age at transplant was 54.5 years (interquartile range, 46-62 years). Following consent to accept hearts from hepatitis C-exposed donors, the median days to heart transplant was 4 (interquartile range, 1-18). No recipients of donors with negative nucleic acid testing results (10 [12.5%]) developed donor-derived hepatitis C. Of 70 patients who were recipients of donors with positive nucleic acid testing results, 67 (95.7%) developed donor-derived hepatitis C over a median follow-up of 301 days (interquartile range, 142-617). Treatment with direct-acting antivirals was well tolerated and yielded sustained virologic responses in all treated patients. Within the cohort with infection, 1-year patient survival was 90.4%, which was not significantly different compared with the cohort without infection or with patients who received transplants from hepatitis C-negative donors during the same period. Conclusions and Relevance: In the era of direct-acting antivirals, hepatitis C-positive donors are a viable option to expand the donor pool, potentially reducing wait-list duration and mortality. In heart transplant recipients with donor-derived hepatitis C, infection is well-tolerated and curable, and 1-year survival is equivalent to that in recipients of hepatitis C-negative donors.

Advanced Heart Failure in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease.

As a result of improvements in care for patients with congenital heart disease (CHD), >90% of children born with CHD are expected to survive to adulthood. For those adults, heart failure (HF) is the leading cause of death. Advances in recognition of, and treatments for, these patients continue to improve. Specifically, adults with CHD are candidates for both heart transplantation and mechanical circulatory support. However, challenges remain that require investigation to improve outcomes.

Center volume and post-transplant survival among adults with congenital heart disease.

BACKGROUND: The number of adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients requiring heart transplantation (HT) continues to grow, and if they survive the first year after transplant, their long-term survival is at least equivalent to non-ACHD patients. The 1-year survival of ACHD patients with HT remains lower than non-ACHD patients. We evaluated the affect of transplant center volume on 1-year survival of ACHD patients. We analyzed United Network of Organ Sharing patients (age ≥18 years) who underwent their first orthotopic HT between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2015, to assess the association between transplant center volume and 1-year survival of ACHD patients. RESULTS: We identified 827 ACHD patients at 113 centers who underwent HT during the study period. The average age of the recipients and donors was 36 ± 13 years (60% men and 84% Caucasian) and 28 ± 11 (63% men and 66% Caucasian), respectively. Of the ACHD patients undergoing HT, 27% (n = 60) were done at low-volume centers, 30% (n = 10) were reported at high-volume centers, and the remaining (n = 43) were at medium-volume centers. A total of 96 patients died within 30 days, including 37 (16.7%) at low-volume, 37 (10.2%) at medium-volume, and 22 (9.0%) at high-volume centers (p = 0.019). The average unadjusted Kaplan-Meier 30-day survival at low-volume centers was 83% ± 2%, which was significantly lower than medium-volume (90% ± 1%) and high-volume (91% ± 2%) centers (log-rank p < 0.05). Within 1 year, 154 patients had died, including 56 (36.4%) at low-volume, 60 (38.9%) at medium-volume, and 38 (24.7%) at high-volume centers (p = 0.011). Average unadjusted Kaplan-Meier 1-year survival at low-volume centers was 75% ± 3%, which was significantly lower than medium-volume (83% ± 2%) and high-volume (84% ± 2%) centers (log-rank p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The 30-day and 1-year survival of ACHD patients undergoing HT is partly influenced by overall transplant center volume and, potentially, volume of ACHD HTs, with low-volume centers performing poorly relative to medium-volume and high-volume centers. The role of peri-operative care and multidisciplinary management in improving survival at low-volume centers required further investigations.

Correction to: Vitamin D and Heart Failure.

The original version of this article, published in Current Heart Failure Reports, Volume 14, Issue 5, October 2017, erroneously cited an author's name as Marshall Brinkley, D" when it should be "Brinkley, DM."

Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Cardiogenic Shock.

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has emerged as a viable treatment for patients in cardiogenic shock with biventricular failure and pulmonary dysfunction. Advances in pump and oxygenator technology, cannulation strategies, patient selection and management, and durable mechanical circulatory support have contributed to expanded utilization of this technology. However, challenges remain that require investigation to improve outcomes.

Outcomes After Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation as Destination Therapy at Transplant Versus Nontransplant Centers.

BACKGROUND: Since Food and Drug Administration's approval of the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as destination therapy, the number of hospitals offering LVAD therapy has grown rapidly. A rising number are performed at centers without internal transplant programs. We sought to determine whether outcomes after destination therapy LVAD implantation are similar at transplant and nontransplant centers. METHODS AND RESULTS: Adult recipients of a primary, continuous-flow LVAD as destination therapy between January 2012 and March 2014 from the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support were included. Subjects were classified by implanting center as transplant (n=3323) or nontransplant (n=260). Center volume before 2012 was categorized as <15 or ≥15 implants. Outcomes included overall survival, freedom from death or major adverse event, rates of individual adverse events, rehospitalization, and health-related quality of life. Patients treated at nontransplant centers were generally less sick, with higher Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support patient profiles and more normal laboratory and hemodynamic values. One-month (94.2% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 95.0-93.4] versus 94.2% [95% CI, 97.1-91.4]) and 12-month (76.4% [95% CI, 77.9-74.8] versus 71.3% [95% CI, 77.4-65.2]) survival were similar at transplant and nontransplant centers, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.70-1.12]). Risk remained similar after adjustment for baseline characteristics (hazard ratio, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.69-1.12]). Freedom from death or major adverse event at 12 months (29.0% [95% CI, 30.6-27.3] versus 29.8% [95% CI, 36.0-23.6]) was similar at transplant and nontransplant centers (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.87-1.18]). Individual adverse event rates, rehospitalization, and postimplant health-related quality of life were also similar. CONCLUSIONS: In a large, modern cohort of destination therapy LVAD recipients, outcomes after implantation were similar at transplant and nontransplant centers.