Intercomparison of treatment concepts for MR image assisted brachytherapy of cervical carcinoma based on GYN GEC-ESTRO recommendations.

PURPOSE: To perform a multicentre intercomparison study of treatment concepts for MRI assisted brachytherapy of cervix cancer based on recommendations of the Gynaecological GEC-ESTRO Working Group. METHODS: Each participating centre (IGR Paris, University Hospital Leuven, Medical University of Vienna) contributed data of one patient with comparable clinical features. GTV, High Risk CTV (HR CTV), Intermediate Risk CTV (IR CTV) and organ walls of bladder, rectum and sigmoid colon were delineated at the time of each brachytherapy fraction on axial MR images with the applicator in place. Dose-volume histograms were calculated to evaluate doses to tumour, target volumes and organs at risk. Dose values were biologically normalised to equivalent doses in 2 Gy fractions (EQD(2), equivalent to 50 cGy/h low dose rate) applying the linear-quadratic model. RESULTS: Total doses to point A from external beam therapy plus brachytherapy ranged from 85 to 91 Gy and were close to the dose covering 90% of HR CTV (D90=85-87 Gy). D90 of IR CTV was within 69-73 Gy. Doses to organs at risk were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates the feasibility of the GEC-ESTRO recommendations. Despite different treatment concepts, biologically normalised total doses to tumour, target volumes and organs at risk were comparable.

Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group (I): concepts and terms in 3D image based 3D treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy with emphasis on MRI assessment of GTV and CTV.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Brachytherapy (BT) plays a crucial role in the management of invasive cervix cancer from stage I to IV. Intracavitary techniques are based on afterloading devices, with different types of applicators. CT and/or MRI compatible applicators allow a sectional image based approach with a better assessment of gross tumour volume (GTV) and definition and delineation of target volume (CTV) compared to traditional approaches. Accurate and reproducible delineation of GTV, CTV and PTV, as well as of critical organs has a direct impact on BT treatment planning, especially if it is possible to adapt the pear-shape isodose by optimisation using DVH analysis. When introducing a 3D image based approach for GTV and CTV assessment, there is a need for a common language to describe the concepts and to define the terms which are to be used. METHODS: In 2000, GEC-ESTRO decided to support 3D imaging based 3D treatment planning approach in cervix cancer BT with the creation of a Working Group. The task was to describe basic concepts and terms and to work out a terminology enabling various groups working in this advanced field to use a common language. The recommendations described in this report were proposed based on clinical experience and dosimetric concepts of different institutions (IGR, Leuven, Vienna) and were stepwise validated against the background of different clinical experience. CONCLUSIONS: As GTV and CTV for BT change significantly during treatment, time frame for assessment of GTV and CTV for BT is specified in this report: at time of diagnosis GTV(D), CTV(D) and at time of BT GTV(B), CTV(B). Furthermore, CTV for BT is defined related to risk for recurrence: high risk CTV and intermediate risk CTV. Beside verbal descriptions detailed examples are given, partly in form of schematic drawings.