Rate of Pathogenic Germline Variants in Patients With Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: Germline genetic testing (GGT) is now recommended for all patients diagnosed with ovarian or pancreatic cancer and for a large proportion of patients based solely on a diagnosis of colorectal or breast cancer. However, GGT is not yet recommended for all patients diagnosed with lung cancer (LC), primarily because of a lack of evidence that supports a significant frequency of identifying pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) in these patients. This study characterizes GGT results in a cohort of patients with LC. METHODS: We reviewed deidentified data for 7,788 patients with GGT (2015-2022). PGV frequencies were compared to a control cohort of unaffected individuals. GGT results were stratified by genomic ancestry, history of cancer, and PGV clinical actionability per current guidelines. RESULTS: Of all patients with LC, 14.9% (1,161/7,788) had PGVs. The rate was similar when restricted to patients with no cancer family history (FH) or personal history (PH) of other cancers (14.3%). PGVs were significantly enriched in BRCA2, ATM, CHEK2, BRCA1, and mismatch repair genes compared with controls. Patients of European (EUR) genomic ancestry had the highest PGV rate (18%) and variants of uncertain significance were significantly higher in patients of non-EUR genomic ancestry. Of the PGVs identified, 61.3% were in DNA damage repair (DDR) genes and 95% were clinically actionable. CONCLUSION: This retrospective study shows a LC diagnosis identifies patients with a significant likelihood of having a cancer-predisposing PGV across genomic ancestries. Enrichment of PGVs in DDR genes suggests that these PGVs may contribute to LC cancer predisposition. The frequency of PGVs among patients with LC did not differ significantly according to FH or PH of other cancers.

Validation of Pharmacogenomic Interaction Probability (PIP) Scores in Predicting Drug-Gene, Drug-Drug-Gene, and Drug-Gene-Gene Interaction Risks in a Large Patient Population.

Utilizing pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing and integrating evidence-based guidance in drug therapy enables an improved treatment response and decreases the occurrence of adverse drug events. We conducted a retrospective analysis to validate the YouScript® PGx interaction probability (PIP) algorithm, which predicts patients for whom PGx testing would identify one or more evidence-based, actionable drug-gene, drug-drug-gene, or drug-gene-gene interactions (EADGIs). PIP scores generated for 36,511 patients were assessed according to the results of PGx multigene panel testing. PIP scores versus the proportion of patients in whom at least one EADGI was found were 22.4% vs. 22.4% (p = 1.000), 23.5% vs. 23.4% (p = 0.6895), 30.9% vs. 29.4% (p = 0.0667), and 27.3% vs. 26.4% (p = 0.3583) for patients tested with a minimum of 3-, 5-, 14-, and 25-gene panels, respectively. These data suggest a striking concordance between the PIP scores and the EAGDIs found by gene panel testing. The ability to identify patients most likely to benefit from PGx testing has the potential to reduce health care costs, enable patient access to personalized medicine, and ultimately improve drug efficacy and safety.

Genetic Testing to Inform Epilepsy Treatment Management From an International Study of Clinical Practice.

Importance: It is currently unknown how often and in which ways a genetic diagnosis given to a patient with epilepsy is associated with clinical management and outcomes. Objective: To evaluate how genetic diagnoses in patients with epilepsy are associated with clinical management and outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of patients referred for multigene panel testing between March 18, 2016, and August 3, 2020, with outcomes reported between May and November 2020. The study setting included a commercial genetic testing laboratory and multicenter clinical practices. Patients with epilepsy, regardless of sociodemographic features, who received a pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variant were included in the study. Case report forms were completed by all health care professionals. Exposures: Genetic test results. Main Outcomes and Measures: Clinical management changes after a genetic diagnosis (ie, 1 P/LP variant in autosomal dominant and X-linked diseases; 2 P/LP variants in autosomal recessive diseases) and subsequent patient outcomes as reported by health care professionals on case report forms. Results: Among 418 patients, median (IQR) age at the time of testing was 4 (1-10) years, with an age range of 0 to 52 years, and 53.8% (n = 225) were female individuals. The mean (SD) time from a genetic test order to case report form completion was 595 (368) days (range, 27-1673 days). A genetic diagnosis was associated with changes in clinical management for 208 patients (49.8%) and usually (81.7% of the time) within 3 months of receiving the result. The most common clinical management changes were the addition of a new medication (78 [21.7%]), the initiation of medication (51 [14.2%]), the referral of a patient to a specialist (48 [13.4%]), vigilance for subclinical or extraneurological disease features (46 [12.8%]), and the cessation of a medication (42 [11.7%]). Among 167 patients with follow-up clinical information available (mean [SD] time, 584 [365] days), 125 (74.9%) reported positive outcomes, 108 (64.7%) reported reduction or elimination of seizures, 37 (22.2%) had decreases in the severity of other clinical signs, and 11 (6.6%) had reduced medication adverse effects. A few patients reported worsening of outcomes, including a decline in their condition (20 [12.0%]), increased seizure frequency (6 [3.6%]), and adverse medication effects (3 [1.8%]). No clinical management changes were reported for 178 patients (42.6%). Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this cross-sectional study suggest that genetic testing of individuals with epilepsy may be materially associated with clinical decision-making and improved patient outcomes.

The KIDNEYCODE Program: Diagnostic Yield and Clinical Features of Individuals with CKD.

Background: Despite increasing recognition that CKD may have underlyi ng genetic causes, genetic testing remains limited. This study evaluated the diagnostic yield and phenotypic spectrum of CKD in individuals tested through the KIDNEYCODE sponsored genetic testing program. Methods: Unrelated individuals who received panel testing (17 genes) through the KIDNEYCODE sponsored genetic testing program were included. Individuals had to meet at least one of the following eligibility criteria: eGFR ≤90 ml/min per 1.73m2 and hematuria or a family history of kidney disease; or suspected/biopsy-confirmed Alport syndrome or FSGS in tested individuals or relatives. Results: Among 859 individuals, 234 (27%) had molecular diagnoses in genes associated with Alport syndrome (n=209), FSGS (n=12), polycystic kidney disease (n=6), and other disorders (n=8). Among those with positive findings in a COL4A gene, the majority were in COL4A5 (n=157, 72 hemizygous male and 85 heterozygous female individuals). A positive family history of CKD, regardless of whether clinical features were reported, was more predictive of a positive finding than was the presence of clinical features alone. For the 248 individuals who had kidney biopsies, a molecular diagnosis was returned for 49 individuals (20%). Most (n=41) individuals had a molecular diagnosis in a COL4A gene, 25 of whom had a previous Alport syndrome clinical diagnosis, and the remaining 16 had previous clinical diagnoses including FSGS (n=2), thin basement membrane disease (n=9), and hematuria (n=1). In total, 491 individuals had a previous clinical diagnosis, 148 (30%) of whom received a molecular diagnosis, the majority (89%, n=131) of which were concordant. Conclusions: Although skewed to identify individuals with Alport syndrome, these findings support the need to improve access to genetic testing for patients with CKD-particularly in the context of family history of kidney disease, hematuria, and hearing loss.

The Impact of Proband Indication for Genetic Testing on the Uptake of Cascade Testing Among Relatives.

Although multiple factors can influence the uptake of cascade genetic testing, the impact of proband indication has not been studied. We performed a retrospective, cross-sectional study comparing cascade genetic testing rates among relatives of probands who received either diagnostic germline testing or non-indication-based proactive screening via next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based multigene panels for hereditary cancer syndromes (HCS) and/or familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). The proportion of probands with a medically actionable (positive) finding were calculated based on genes associated with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Tier 1 conditions, HCS genes, and FH genes. Among probands with a positive finding, cascade testing rates and influencing factors were assessed. A total of 270,715 probands were eligible for inclusion in the study (diagnostic n = 254,281,93.9%; proactive n = 16,434, 6.1%). A positive result in a gene associated with a CDC Tier 1 condition was identified in 10,520 diagnostic probands (4.1%) and 337 proactive probands (2.1%), leading to cascade testing among families of 3,305 diagnostic probands (31.4%) and 36 proactive probands (10.7%) (p < 0.0001). A positive result in an HCS gene was returned to 23,272 diagnostic probands (9.4%) and 970 proactive probands (6.1%), leading to cascade testing among families of 6,611 diagnostic probands (28.4%) and 89 proactive probands (9.2%) (p < 0.0001). Cascade testing due to a positive result in an HCS gene was more commonly pursued when the diagnostic proband was White, had a finding in a gene associated with a CDC Tier 1 condition, or had a personal history of cancer, or when the proactive proband was female. A positive result in an FH gene was returned to 1,647 diagnostic probands (25.3%) and 67 proactive probands (0.62%), leading to cascade testing among families of 360 diagnostic probands (21.9%) and 4 proactive probands (6.0%) (p < 0.01). Consistently higher rates of cascade testing among families of diagnostic probands may be due to a perceived urgency because of personal or family history of disease. Due to the proven clinical benefit of cascade testing, further research on obstacles to systematic implementation and uptake of testing for relatives of any proband with a medically actionable variant is warranted.

Germline Pathogenic Variant Prevalence Among Latin American and US Hispanic Individuals Undergoing Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study.

PURPOSE: To report on pathogenic germline variants detected among individuals undergoing genetic testing for hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer (HBOC) from Latin America and compare them with self-reported Hispanic individuals from the United States. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, unrelated individuals with a personal/family history suggestive of HBOC who received clinician-ordered germline multigene sequencing were grouped according to the location of the ordering physician: group A, Mexico, Central America, and the Caribbean; group B, South America; and group C, United States with individuals who self-reported Hispanic ethnicity. Relatives who underwent cascade testing were analyzed separately. RESULTS: Among 24,075 unrelated probands across all regions, most were female (94.9%) and reported a personal history suggestive of HBOC (range, 65.0%-80.6%); the mean age at testing was 49.1 ± 13.1 years. The average number of genes analyzed per patient was highest in group A (A 63 ± 28, B 56 ± 29, and C 40 ± 28). Between 9.1% and 18.7% of patients had pathogenic germline variants in HBOC genes (highest yield in group A), with the majority associated with high HBOC risk. Compared with US Hispanics individuals the overall yield was significantly higher in both Latin American regions (A v C P = 1.64×10-9, B v C P < 2.2×10-16). Rates of variants of uncertain significance were similar across all three regions (33.7%-42.6%). Cascade testing uptake was low in all regions (A 6.6%, B 4.5%, and C 1.9%). CONCLUSION: This study highlights the importance of multigene panel testing in Latin American individuals with newly diagnosed or history of HBOC, who can benefit from medical management changes including targeted therapies, eligibility to clinical trials, risk-reducing surgeries, surveillance and prevention of secondary malignancy, and genetic counseling and subsequent cascade testing of at-risk relatives.

Clinical Impact of Pathogenic Variants in DNA Damage Repair Genes beyond BRCA1 and BRCA2 in Breast and Ovarian Cancer Patients.

Consensus guidelines for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer include management recommendations for pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in ATM, CHEK2, PALB2, and other DNA damage repair (DDR) genes beyond BRCA1 or BRCA2. We report on clinical management decisions across three academic medical centers resulting from P/LP findings in DDR genes in breast/ovarian cancer patients. Among 2184 patients, 156 (7.1%) carried a P/LP variant in a DDR gene. Clinical follow-up information was available for 101/156 (64.7%) patients. Genetic test result-based management recommendations were made for 57.8% (n = 59) of patients and for 64.7% (n = 66) of patients' family members. Most recommendations were made for moderate-to-high risk genes and were consistent with guidelines. Sixty-six percent of patients (n = 39/59) implemented recommendations. This study suggests that P/LP variants in DDR genes beyond BRCA1 and BRCA2 can change clinical management recommendations for patients and their family members, facilitate identification of new at-risk carriers, and impact treatment decisions. Additional efforts are needed to improve the implementation rates of genetic-testing-based management recommendations for patients and their family members.

Value of genetic testing for pediatric epilepsy: Driving earlier diagnosis of ceroid lipofuscinosis type 2 Batten disease.

This study assessed the effectiveness of genetic testing in shortening the time to diagnosis of late infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis type 2 (CLN2) disease. Individuals who received epilepsy gene panel testing through Behind the Seizure® , a sponsored genetic testing program (Cohort A), were compared to children outside of the sponsored testing program during the same period (Cohort B). Two cohorts were analyzed: children aged ≥24 to ≤60 months with unprovoked seizure onset at ≥24 months between December 2016 and January 2020 (Cohort 1) and children aged 0 to ≤60 months at time of testing with unprovoked seizure onset at any age between February 2019 and January 2020 (Cohort 2). The diagnostic yield in Cohort 1A (n = 1814) was 8.4% (n = 153). The TPP1 diagnostic yield within Cohort 1A was 2.9-fold higher compared to Cohort 1B (1.0%, n = 18/1814 vs. .35%, n = 8/2303; p = .0157). The average time from first symptom to CLN2 disease diagnosis was significantly shorter than previously reported (9.8 vs. 22.7 months, p < .001). These findings indicate that facilitated access to early epilepsy gene panel testing helps to increase diagnostic yield for CLN2 disease and shortens the time to diagnosis, enabling earlier intervention.

Experience analysing over 190,000 embryo trophectoderm biopsies using a novel FAST-SeqS preimplantation genetic testing assay.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Is FAST-SeqS an accurate methodology for preimplantation genetic testing for whole-chromosome aneuploidy (PGT-A)? What additional types of chromosomal abnormalities can be assessed? What are the observed aneuploidy rates in a large clinical cohort? DESIGN: FAST-SeqS, a next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based assay amplifying genome-wide LINE1 repetitive sequences, was validated using reference samples. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Clinically derived trophectoderm biopsies submitted for PGT-A were assessed, and aneuploidy and mosaicism rates among biopsies were determined. Clinician-provided outcome rates were calculated. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity were over 95% for all aneuploidy types tested in the validation. Comparison of FAST-SeqS with VeriSeq showed high concordance (98.5%). Among embryos with actionable results (n = 182,827), 46.2% were aneuploid. Whole-chromosome aneuploidies were most observed (72.9% without or 8.7% with a segmental aneuploidy), with rates increasing with egg age; segmental aneuploidy rates did not. Segmental aneuploidy (n = 20,557) was observed on all chromosomes (most commonly deletions), with frequencies associated with chromosome length. Mosaic-only abnormalities constituted 10.1% (n = 3862/38145) of samples. Abnormal ploidy constituted 1.8% (n = 2370/128,991) of samples, triploidy being the most common (73.6%). Across 3297 frozen embryo transfers, the mean clinical pregnancy rate was 62% (range 38-80%); the mean combined ongoing pregnancy and live birth rate was 57% (range 38-72%). CONCLUSION: FAST-SeqS is a clinically reliable and scalable method for PGT-A, is comparable to whole-genome amplification-based platforms, and detects additional information related to ploidy using SNP analysis. Results suggest ongoing benefit of PGT-A using FAST-SeqS, consistent with other platforms.

Molecular Diagnoses of X-Linked and Other Genetic Hypophosphatemias: Results From a Sponsored Genetic Testing Program.

X-linked hypophosphatemia (XLH), a dominant disorder caused by pathogenic variants in the PHEX gene, affects both sexes of all ages and results in elevated serum fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) and below-normal serum phosphate. In XLH, rickets, osteomalacia, short stature, and lower limb deformity may be present with muscle pain and/or weakness/fatigue, bone pain, joint pain/stiffness, hearing difficulty, enthesopathy, osteoarthritis, and dental abscesses. Invitae and Ultragenyx collaborated to provide a no-charge sponsored testing program using a 13-gene next-generation sequencing panel to confirm clinical XLH or aid diagnosis of suspected XLH/other genetic hypophosphatemia. Individuals aged ≥6 months with clinical XLH or suspected genetic hypophosphatemia were eligible. Of 831 unrelated individuals tested between February 2019 and June 2020 in this cross-sectional study, 519 (62.5%) individuals had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in PHEX (PHEX-positive). Among the 312 PHEX-negative individuals, 38 received molecular diagnoses in other genes, including ALPL, CYP27B1, ENPP1, and FGF23; the remaining 274 did not have a molecular diagnosis. Among 319 patients with a provider-reported clinical diagnosis of XLH, 88.7% (n = 283) had a reportable PHEX variant; 81.5% (n = 260) were PHEX-positive. The most common variant among PHEX-positive individuals was an allele with both the gain of exons 13-15 and c.*231A>G (3'UTR variant) (n = 66/519). Importantly, over 80% of copy number variants would have been missed by traditional microarray analysis. A positive molecular diagnosis in 41 probands (4.9%; 29 PHEX positive, 12 non-PHEX positive) resulted in at least one family member receiving family testing. Additional clinical or family member information resulted in variant(s) of uncertain significance (VUS) reclassification to pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) in 48 individuals, highlighting the importance of segregation and clinical data. In one of the largest XLH genetic studies to date, 65 novel PHEX variants were identified and a high XLH diagnostic yield demonstrated broad insight into the genetic basis of XLH. © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Multigene Panel Testing in a Large Cohort of Adults With Epilepsy: Diagnostic Yield and Clinically Actionable Genetic Findings.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although genetic testing among children with epilepsy has demonstrated clinical utility and become a part of routine testing, studies in adults are limited. This study reports the diagnostic yield of genetic testing in adults with epilepsy. METHODS: Unrelated individuals aged 18 years and older who underwent diagnostic genetic testing for epilepsy using a comprehensive, next-generation sequencing-based, targeted gene panel (range 89-189 genes) were included in this cross-sectional study. Clinical information, provided at the discretion of the ordering clinician, was reviewed and analyzed. Diagnostic yield was calculated for all individuals including by age at seizure onset and comorbidities based on clinician-reported information. The proportion of individuals with clinically actionable genetic findings, including instances when a specific treatment would be indicated or contraindicated due to a diagnostic finding, was calculated. RESULTS: Among 2,008 individuals, a diagnostic finding was returned for 218 adults (10.9%), with clinically actionable findings in 55.5% of diagnoses. The highest diagnostic yield was in adults with seizure onset during infancy (29.6%, 0-1 year), followed by in early childhood (13.6%, 2-4 years), late childhood (7.0%, 5-10 years), adolescence (2.4%, 11-17 years), and adulthood (3.7%, ≥18 years). Comorbid intellectual disability (ID) or developmental delay resulted in a high diagnostic yield (16.0%), most notably for females (19.6% in females vs 12.3% in males). Among individuals with pharmacoresistant epilepsy, 13.5% had a diagnostic finding, and of these, 57.4% were clinically actionable genetic findings. DISCUSSION: These data reinforce the utility of genetic testing for adults with epilepsy, particularly for those with childhood-onset seizures, ID, and pharmacoresistance. This is an important consideration due to longer survival and the complexity of the transition from pediatric to adult care. In addition, more than half of diagnostic findings in this study were considered clinically actionable, suggesting that genetic testing could have a direct impact on clinical management and outcomes.

Elucidating clinical phenotypic variability associated with the polyT tract and TG repeats in CFTR.

Biallelic pathogenic variants in CFTR manifest as cystic fibrosis (CF) or other CFTR-related disorders (CFTR-RDs). The 5T allele, causing alternative splicing and reduced protein activity, is modulated by the adjacent TG repeat element, though previous data have been limited to small, selective cohorts. Here, the risk and spectrum of phenotypes associated with the CFTR TG-T5 haplotype variants (TG11T5, TG12T5, and TG13T5) in the absence of the p.Arg117His variant are evaluated. Individuals who received physician-ordered next-generation sequencing of CFTR were included. TG[11-13]T5 variant frequencies (biallelic or with another CF-causing variant [CFvar]) were calculated. Clinical information reported by the ordering provider or the individual was examined. Among 548,300 individuals, the T5 minor allele frequency (MAF) was 4.2% (TG repeat distribution: TG11 = 68.1%, TG12 = 29.5%, TG13 = 2.4%). When present with a CFvar, each TG[11-13]T5 variant was significantly enriched in individuals with a high suspicion of CF or CFTR-RD (personal/family history of CF/CFTR-RD) compared to those with a low suspicion for CF or CFTR-RD (hereditary cancer screening, CFTR not requisitioned). Compared to CFvar/CFvar individuals, those with TG[11-13]T5/CFvar generally had single-organ involvement, milder symptoms, variable expressivity, and reduced penetrance. These data improve our understanding of disease risks associated with TG[11-13]T5 variants and have important implications for reproductive genetic counseling.

SMA Identified: Clinical and Molecular Findings From a Sponsored Testing Program for Spinal Muscular Atrophy in More Than 2,000 Individuals.

Background: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) linked to chromosome 5q is an inherited progressive neuromuscular disorder with a narrow therapeutic window for optimal treatment. Although genetic testing provides a definitive molecular diagnosis that can facilitate access to effective treatments, limited awareness and other barriers may prohibit widespread testing. In this study, the clinical and molecular findings of SMA Identified-a no-charge sponsored next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based genetic testing program for SMA diagnosis-are reported. Methods: Between March 2018 and March 2020, unrelated individuals who had a confirmed or suspected SMA diagnosis or had a family history of SMA were eligible. All individuals underwent diagnostic genetic testing for SMA at clinician discretion. In total, 2,459 individuals were tested and included in this analysis. An NGS-based approach interrogated sequence and copy number of SMN1 and SMN2. Variants were confirmed by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification sequencing. Individuals were categorized according to genetic test results: diagnostic (two pathogenic SMN1 variants), nearly diagnostic (SMN1 exon-7 deletion with a variant of uncertain significance [VUS] in SMN1 or SMN2), indeterminate VUS (one VUS in SMN1 or SMN2), carrier (heterozygous SMN1 deletion only), or negative (no pathogenic variants or VUS in SMN1 or SMN2). Diagnostic yield was calculated. Genetic test results were analyzed based on clinician-reported clinical features and genetic modifiers (SMN2 copy number and SMN2 c.859G>C). Results: In total, 2,459 unrelated individuals (mean age 24.3 ± 23.0 years) underwent diagnostic testing. The diagnostic yield for diagnostic plus nearly diagnostic results was 31.3% (n = 771/2,459). Age of onset and clinical presentation varied considerably for individuals and was dependent on SMN2 copy number. Homozygous deletions represented the most common genetic etiology (96.2%), with sequence variants also observed in probands with clinical diagnoses of SMA. Conclusions: Using a high-yield panel test in a no-charge sponsored program early in the diagnostic odyssey may open the door for medical interventions in a substantial number of individuals with SMA. These findings have potential implications for clinical management of probands and their families.

One in seven pathogenic variants can be challenging to detect by NGS: an analysis of 450,000 patients with implications for clinical sensitivity and genetic test implementation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of technically challenging variants on the implementation, validation, and diagnostic yield of commonly used clinical genetic tests. Such variants include large indels, small copy-number variants (CNVs), complex alterations, and variants in low-complexity or segmentally duplicated regions. METHODS: An interlaboratory pilot study used synthetic specimens to assess detection of challenging variant types by various next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based workflows. One well-performing workflow was further validated and used in clinician-ordered testing of more than 450,000 patients. RESULTS: In the interlaboratory study, only 2 of 13 challenging variants were detected by all 10 workflows, and just 3 workflows detected all 13. Limitations were also observed among 11 less-challenging indels. In clinical testing, 21.6% of patients carried one or more pathogenic variants, of which 13.8% (17,561) were classified as technically challenging. These variants were of diverse types, affecting 556 of 1,217 genes across hereditary cancer, cardiovascular, neurological, pediatric, reproductive carrier screening, and other indicated tests. CONCLUSION: The analytic and clinical sensitivity of NGS workflows can vary considerably, particularly for prevalent, technically challenging variants. This can have important implications for the design and validation of tests (by laboratories) and the selection of tests (by clinicians) for a wide range of clinical indications.

Democratizing genomics: Leveraging software to make genetics an integral part of routine care.

Genetic testing can provide definitive molecular diagnoses and guide clinical management decisions from preconception through adulthood. Innovative solutions for scaling clinical genomics services are necessary if they are to transition from a niche specialty to a routine part of patient care. The expertise of specialists, like genetic counselors and medical geneticists, has traditionally been relied upon to facilitate testing and follow-up, and while ideal, this approach is limited in its ability to integrate genetics into primary care. As individuals, payors, and providers increasingly realize the value of genetics in mainstream medicine, several implementation challenges need to be overcome. These include electronic health record integration, patient and provider education, tools to stay abreast of guidelines, and simplification of the test ordering process. Currently, no single platform offers a holistic view of genetic testing that streamlines the entire process across specialties that begins with identifying at-risk patients in mainstream care settings, providing pretest education, facilitating consent and test ordering, and following up as a "genetic companion" for ongoing management. We describe our vision for using software that includes clinical-grade chatbots and decision support tools, with direct access to genetic counselors and pharmacists within a modular, integrated, end-to-end testing journey.

The potential impact of tumor suppressor genes on human gametogenesis: a case-control study.

PURPOSE: To study the incidence of tumor suppressor gene (TSG) mutations in men and women with impaired gametogenesis. METHODS: Gene association analyses were performed on blood samples in two distinct patient populations: males with idiopathic male infertility and females with unexplained diminished ovarian reserve (DOR). The male study group consisted of men with idiopathic azoospermia, oligozoospermia, asthenozoospermia, or teratozoospermia. Age-matched controls were men with normal semen analyses. The female study group consisted of women with unexplained DOR with anti-Müllerian hormone levels ≤ 1.1 ng/mL. Controls were age-matched women with normal ovarian reserve (> 1.1 ng/mL). RESULTS: Fifty-seven male cases (mean age = 38.4; mean sperm count = 15.7 ± 12.1; mean motility = 38.2 ± 24.7) and 37 age-matched controls (mean age = 38.0; mean sperm count = 89.6 ± 37.5; mean motility = 56.2 ± 14.3) were compared. Variants observed in CHD5 were found to be enriched in the study group (p = 0.000107). The incidence of CHD5 mutation c.*3198_*3199insT in the 3'UTR (rs538186680) was significantly higher in cases compared to controls (p = 0.0255). 72 DOR cases (mean age = 38.7; mean AMH = 0.5 ± 0.3; mean FSH = 11.7 ± 12.5) and 48 age-matched controls (mean age = 37.6; mean AMH = 4.1 ± 3.0; mean FSH = 7.1 ± 2.2) were compared. Mutations in CHD5 (c.-140A>C), RB1 (c.1422-18delT, rs70651121), and TP53 (c.376-161A>G, rs75821853) were found at significantly higher frequencies in DOR cases compared to controls (p ≤ 0.05). In addition, 363 variants detected in the DOR patients were not present in the control group. CONCLUSION: Unexplained impaired gametogenesis in both males and females may be associated with genetic variation in TSGs. TSGs, which play cardinal roles in cell-cycle control, might also be critical for normal spermatogenesis and oogenesis. If validated in larger prospective studies, it is possible that TSGs provide an etiological basis for some patients with impaired gametogenesis.