Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr ; 34(3): 280-8, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20467009

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine whether caloric intake independently influences mortality and morbidity of critically ill patients. METHODS: The study was conducted as a nested cohort study within a randomized controlled trial in a tertiary care intensive care unit (ICU). The main exposure in the study was average caloric intake/target for the first 7 ICU days. The primary outcomes were ICU and hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included ICU-acquired infections, ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), duration of mechanical ventilation days, and ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS). The authors divided patients (n = 523) into 3 tertiles according to the percentage of caloric intake/target: tertile I <33.4%, tertile II 33.4%-64.6%, and tertile III >64.6%. To adjust for potentially confounding variables, the authors assessed the association between caloric intake/target and the different outcomes using multivariate logistic regression for categorical outcomes (tertile I was used as reference) and multiple linear regression for continuous outcomes. RESULTS: Tertile III was associated with higher adjusted hospital mortality, higher risk of ICU-acquired infections, and a trend toward higher VAP rate. Increasing caloric intake was independently associated with a significant increase in duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU LOS, and hospital LOS. CONCLUSIONS: The data demonstrate that near-target caloric intake is associated with significantly increased hospital mortality, ICU-acquired infections, mechanical ventilation duration, and ICU and hospital LOS. Further studies are needed to explore whether reducing caloric intake would improve the outcomes in critically ill patients.


Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos/normas , Estado Terminal/mortalidade , Infecção Hospitalar/etiologia , Ingestão de Energia , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/normas , Respiração Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Tempo de Internação , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/etiologia , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/métodos , Valores de Referência , Fatores de Risco
2.
Crit Care Med ; 36(12): 3190-7, 2008 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18936702

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The role of intensive insulin therapy in medical surgical intensive care patients remains unclear. The objective of this study was to examine the effect of intensive insulin therapy on mortality in medical surgical intensive care unit patients. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTINGS: Tertiary care intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Medical surgical intensive care unit patients with admission blood glucose of > 6.1 mmol/L or 110 mg/dL. INTERVENTION: A total of 523 patients were randomly assigned to receive intensive insulin therapy (target blood glucose 4.4-6.1 mmol/L or 80-110 mg/dL) or conventional insulin therapy (target blood glucose 10-11.1 mmol/L or 180-200 mg/dL). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN OUTCOMES: The primary end point was intensive care unit mortality. Secondary end points included hospital mortality, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, mechanical ventilation duration, the need for renal replacement therapy and packed red blood cells transfusion, and the rates of intensive care unit acquired infections as well as the rate of hypoglycemia (defined as blood glucose < or = 2.2 mmol/L or 40 mg/dL). There was no significant difference in intensive care unit mortality between the intensive insulin therapy and conventional insulin therapy groups (13.5% vs. 17.1%, p = 0.30). After adjustment for baseline characteristics, intensive insulin therapy was not associated with mortality difference (adjusted hazard ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval 0.70-1.72). Hypoglycemia occurred more frequently with intensive insulin therapy (28.6% vs. 3.1% of patients; p < 0.0001 or 6.8/100 treatment days vs. 0.4/100 treatment days; p < 0.0001). There was no difference between the intensive insulin therapy and conventional insulin therapy in any of the other secondary end points. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive insulin therapy was not associated with improved survival among medical surgical intensive care unit patients and was associated with increased occurrence of hypoglycemia. Based on these results, we do not advocate universal application of intensive insulin therapy in intensive care unit patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials registry (ISRCTN07413772) http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN07413772/07413772; 2005.


Assuntos
Estado Terminal/terapia , Hipoglicemia/induzido quimicamente , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Insulina/uso terapêutico , APACHE , Glicemia/análise , Pesos e Medidas Corporais , Estado Terminal/mortalidade , Demografia , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/administração & dosagem , Insulina/administração & dosagem , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Período Pós-Operatório , Respiração Artificial , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...