Histopathological diagnoses of adnexal masses: which parameters are relevant in preoperative assessment?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess which clinical, laboratory and ultrasound characteristics of adnexal masses might predict the histopathological nature of the disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study involved all women treated at the Clinic of Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinical Centre of Serbia for adnexal tumors between July 1, 2010 and December 31, 2011. On admission, detailed anamnestic and laboratory data were obtained, expert ultrasound scan performed and RMI was calculated for all patients. Data were related to histopathological findings and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The study included 540 women out of which 85 had malignant (seven diagnoses), 435 benign (seven diagnoses) and 20 borderline tumors. All types of malignant and borderline tumors were more frequent in postmenopausal women (p=0.000). Only papillary adenocarcinoma significantly more often produced early metastases (p=0.000). Ascites is a common finding in Krukenberg tumors, granulose cell tumors and papillary adenocarcinomas. There were significant differences between tumor diagnoses regarding the levels of Ca 125 and CEA, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and risk of malignancy index (RMI) (p<0.05). No significant differences were found within the group of malignant tumor types regarding the levels of all examined tumor markers, ESR as well as RMI (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In the light of our results, patient age, menopausal status, blood levels of Ca 125, CEA and ESR, as well as calculated RMI, can predict the nature of adnexal masses. Unfortunately none of the examined parameters can accurately determine the exact histopathological diagnosis of the adnexal tumor.

Risk of malignancy index validity assessment in premenopausal and postmenopausal women with adnexal tumors.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the validity of the risk of malignancy index (RMI) in premenopausal and postmenopausal patients with adnexal masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study involved all women treated for adnexal tumors throughout an 18-month period in the Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Clinical Center of Serbia (Belgrade, Serbia). On admission, detailed anamnestic and laboratory data were obtained and an expert ultrasound scan was performed. The RMI was calculated for all patients and the obtained data were related to histopathological findings of the tumors. For statistical analysis, we used descriptive and analytical statistics methods and an SPSS computer program. RESULTS: From a total number of 540 women, 85 women had malignant tumors; 20 women, borderline tumors; and 435 women, benign adnexal tumors. The RMI was reliable in 84.6% of all patients; in 77% of premenopausal patients, and in 81.1% of postmenopausal patients. The sensitivity of the RMI in the overall population was 83.81%; the specificity was 77.24%; the positive predictive value (PPV) was 47.06%, and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 95.18%. In premenopausal women, the RMI sensitivity was 83.87%; specificity, 80.31%; PPV, 28.89%; and NPV, 98.12%. In postmenopausal women the RMI sensitivity was 83.78%; specificity, 68.18%; PPV, 63.92%; and NPV, 74.71%. CONCLUSION: The RMI was a reliable factor for differentiating benign from malignant adnexal masses in premenopausal and postmenopausal patients.

Current diagnostic approach to patients with adnexal masses: which tools are relevant in routine praxis?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to investigate which anamnestic, laboratory and ultrasound parameters used in routine practice could predict the nature of adnexal mass, thus enabling referral to relevant specialist. METHODS: Study involved the women treated for adnexal tumors throughout a period of 2 years. On admission, detailed anamnestic and laboratory data were obtained, expert ultrasound scan was performed, and power Doppler index (PDI), risk of malignancy index (RMI) and body mass index (BMI) were calculated for all patients. Obtained data were related to histopathological findings, and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The study included 689 women (112 malignant, 544 benignant, and 33 borderline tumors). Malignant and borderline tumors were more frequent in postmenopausal women (P=0.000). Women who had benignant tumors had the lowest BMI (P=0.000). There were significant (P<0.05) differences among tumor types regarding erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CA125 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels. Among ultrasound findings, larger tumor diameter and ascites were more frequent in malignant tumors (P=0.000). Women with malignant tumors had highest values of RMI and PDI (P=0.000). CONCLUSIONS: Anamnestic data, ultrasound parameters and laboratory analyses were all found to be good discriminating factors among malignant, benignant and borderline tumors.

Introduction of new Tumor Marker Age Score in clinical practice: Validity evaluation for differentiation benign from malignant adnexal masses.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to examine several tumor markers and their correlation with pathohistological findings in patients with adnexal masses. METHODS: Study involved 139 patients, 84 of them with benign, 47 with malignant and 8 with borderline adnexal tumor. Levels of CA 125, CA 19-9, CEA and CA 15-3 were obtained preoperatively and assessed regarding the specific pathohistological diagnose and the patient's age. Obtaining these results led us to divide the patient's CA 125 levels with age and by doing that we have attained a new Tumor Marker Age score (TMA score). RESULTS: Patients with malignant adnexal tumors had significantly higher levels of CEA (p<0.05), CA 125, CA 19-9 and CA 15-3 tumor markers (p<0.01), in comparison with patients with benign tumors. TMA score highly statistically correlate with the tumor type (benignant/malignant). CONCLUSIONS: With the increase of tumor marker levels and the patient's age the malignant nature of adnexal tumors is more often. Results of our study highlight the importance of the use of combined tumor markers (at least CA-125 and CA 19-9) in women with adnexal masses. Those levels along with the patient's age and new TMA score could preoperatively predict malignant nature of the tumor.