Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 12(6): e0006461, 2018 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29883449

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: During the West Africa Ebola outbreak, cultural practices have been described as hindering response efforts. The acceptance of control measures improved during the outbreak, but little is known about how and why this occurred. We conducted a qualitative study in two administrative districts of Sierra Leone to understand Ebola survivor, community, and health worker perspectives on Ebola control measures. We aimed to gain an understanding of community interactions with the Ebola response to inform future intervention strategies. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Participants (25 survivors, 24 community members, and 16 health workers) were recruited purposively. A flexible participatory method gathered data through field notes and in-depth, topic-led interviews. These were analysed thematically with NVivo10© by open coding, constant comparison, and the principles of grounded theory. The primary theme, 'when Ebola is real', centred on denial, knowledge, and acceptance. Ebola was denied until it was experienced or observed first-hand and thus health promotion was more effective if undertaken by those directly exposed to Ebola rather than by mass media communication. Factors that enabled acceptance and engagement with control measures included: access to good, proximate care and prevention activities; seeing that people can survive infection; and the co-option of trusted or influential local leadership, with bylaws implemented by community leaders being strongly respected. All participants noted that dignity, respect, and compassion were key components of effective control measures. CONCLUSIONS: Successful control approaches need strong community leadership, with the aim of achieving collective understanding between communities and health workers. Health promotion for communities at risk is best conducted through people who have had close interaction with or who have survived Ebola as opposed to reliance on broad mass communication strategies.


Assuntos
Participação da Comunidade , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Epidemias/prevenção & controle , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/epidemiologia , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/prevenção & controle , Controle de Infecções , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Agentes Comunitários de Saúde/psicologia , Agentes Comunitários de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Gerenciamento Clínico , Feminino , Pessoal de Saúde , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/virologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pesquisa Qualitativa , População Rural , Serra Leoa/epidemiologia , População Urbana , Adulto Jovem
2.
PLoS One ; 12(5): e0176692, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28459838

RESUMO

Between August-December 2014, Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) patients from Tonkolili District were referred for care to two Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) Ebola Management Centres (EMCs) outside the district (distant EMCs). In December 2014, MSF opened an EMC in Tonkolili District (district EMC). We examined the effect of opening a district-based EMC on time to admission and number of suspect cases dead on arrival (DOA), and identified factors associated with fatality in EVD patients, residents in Tonkolili District. Residents of Tonkolili district who presented between 12 September 2014 and 23 February 2015 to the district EMC and the two distant EMCs were identified from EMC line-lists. EVD cases were confirmed by a positive Ebola PCR test. We calculated time to admission since the onset of symptoms, case-fatality and adjusted Risk Ratios (aRR) using Binomial regression. Of 249 confirmed Ebola cases, 206 (83%) were admitted to the distant EMCs and 43 (17%) to the district EMC. Of them 110 (45%) have died. Confirmed cases dead on arrival (n = 10) were observed only in the distant EMCs. The median time from symptom onset to admission was 6 days (IQR 4,8) in distant EMCs and 3 days (IQR 2,7) in the district EMC (p<0.001). Cases were 2.0 (95%CI 1.4-2.9) times more likely to have delayed admission (>3 days after symptom onset) in the distant compared with the district EMC, but were less likely (aRR = 0.8; 95%CI 0.6-1.0) to have a high viral load (cycle threshold ≤22). A fatal outcome was associated with a high viral load (aRR 2.6; 95%CI 1.8-3.6) and vomiting at first presentation (aRR 1.4; 95%CI 1.0-2.0). The opening of a district EMC was associated with earlier admission of cases to appropriate care facilities, an essential component of reducing EVD transmission. High viral load and vomiting at admission predicted fatality. Healthcare providers should consider the location of EMCs to ensure equitable access during Ebola outbreaks.


Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/terapia , Tempo para o Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Surtos de Doenças , Ebolavirus , Feminino , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/mortalidade , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Admissão do Paciente , Análise de Regressão , Socorro em Desastres , Estudos Retrospectivos , Risco , Serra Leoa/epidemiologia , Carga Viral , Vômito/fisiopatologia , Vômito/terapia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...