Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 39
Filtrar
1.
Eur J Heart Fail ; 21(2): 238-246, 2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30485612

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Efficient incorporation of e-health in patients with heart failure (HF) may enhance health care efficiency and patient empowerment. We aimed to assess the effect on self-care of (i) the European Society of Cardiology/Heart Failure Association website 'heartfailurematters.org' on top of usual care, and (ii) an e-health adjusted care pathway leaving out 'in person' routine HF nurse consultations in stable HF patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a three-group parallel-randomized trial in stable HF patients from nine Dutch outpatient clinics, we compared two interventions ( heartfailurematters.org website and an e-health adjusted care pathway) to usual care. The primary outcome was self-care measured with the European Heart Failure Self-care Behaviour Scale. Secondary outcomes were health status, mortality, and hospitalizations. In total, 450 patients were included. The mean age was 66.8 ± 11.0 years, 74.2% were male, and 78.8% classified themselves as New York Heart Association I or II at baseline. After 3 months of follow-up, the mean score on the self-care scale was significantly higher in the groups using the website and the adjusted care pathway compared to usual care (73.5 vs. 70.8, 95% confidence interval 0.6-6.2; and 78.2 vs. 70.8, 95% confidence interval 3.8- 9.4, respectively). The effect attenuated, until no differences after 1 year between the groups. Quality of life showed a similar pattern. Other secondary outcomes did not clearly differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both the heartfailurematters.org website and an e-health adjusted care pathway improved self-care in HF patients on the short term, but not on the long term. Continuous updating of e-health facilities could be helpful to sustain effects. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01755988.


Assuntos
Cardiologia/métodos , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Nível de Saúde , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Mídias Sociais , Sociedades Médicas , Telemedicina/métodos , Idoso , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Melhoria de Qualidade , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 73(5): 1416-1422, 2018 05 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29438547

RESUMO

Objectives: Antibiotics are too often prescribed in childhood respiratory tract infection (RTI), despite limited effectiveness, potential side effects and bacterial resistance. We aimed to reduce antibiotic prescribing for children with RTI by online training for general practitioners (GPs) and information for parents. Methods: A pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial in primary care. The intervention consisted of online training for GPs and an information booklet for parents. The primary outcome was the antibiotic prescription rate for children presenting with RTI symptoms, as registered by GPs. Secondary outcomes were number of reconsultations within the same disease episode, consultations for new episodes, hospital referrals and pharmacy-dispensed antibiotic courses for children. This trial was registered at the Dutch Trial Register (NTR), registration number: NTR4240. Results: After randomization, GPs from a total of 32 general practices registered 1009 consultations. An antibiotic was prescribed in 21% of consultations in the intervention group, compared with 33% in the usual care group, controlled for baseline prescribing (rate ratio 0.65, 95% CI 0.46-0.91). The probability of reconsulting during the same RTI episode did not differ significantly between the intervention and control groups, and nor did the numbers of consultations for new episodes and hospital referrals. In the intervention group antibiotic dispensing was 32 courses per 1000 children/year lower than the control group, adjusted for baseline prescribing (rate ratio 0.78, 95% CI 0.66-0.92). The numbers and proportion of second-choice antibiotics did not differ significantly. Conclusions: Concise, feasible, online GP training, with an information booklet for parents, showed a relevant reduction in antibiotic prescribing for children with RTI.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Educação a Distância/métodos , Educação Médica Continuada/métodos , Educação em Saúde/métodos , Folhetos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Infecções Respiratórias/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Uso de Medicamentos/normas , Feminino , Clínicos Gerais , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pais
4.
Prim Care Diabetes ; 12(1): 80-86, 2018 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28919055

RESUMO

AIMS: To determine if type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with the spectrum of uropathogens and antimicrobial resistance in urinary tract infections (UTI) in primary care. METHODS: A cross-sectional study in female outpatients ≥30 years with positive urine cultures. T2DM patients were 1:1 matched to controls by age group and general practitioner (GP). GPs were sent questionnaires for additional data. Uropathogens and resistance patterns were compared between patients with and without T2DM. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to assess the independent association between T2DM and resistance to first line treatments, defined as resistance to nitrofurantoin, trimethoprim, fosfomycin, ciprofloxacin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and/or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. RESULTS: In 566 urine cultures, 680 uropathogens were found. Resistance to first line treatment antibiotics was present in 62.5% of patients. Frequencies and resistance rates of uropathogens did not differ between both groups of patients. Previous UTI and previous hospital admission were independent risk factors for resistance, but T2DM was not. CONCLUSIONS: In this study T2DM was not an independent risk factor for antimicrobial resistance in UTI in primary care. Previous UTI and hospitalisation are drivers of resistance and should be included in the decision to perform a urine culture to target first line UTI treatment.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Comorbidade , Estudos Transversais , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Modelos Logísticos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Infecções Urinárias/diagnóstico , Infecções Urinárias/microbiologia
5.
Eur J Heart Fail ; 19(11): 1447-1454, 2017 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28871622

RESUMO

AIMS: In 2007, the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) launched the information website heartfailurematters.org (HFM site) with the aim of creating a practical tool through which to provide advice and guidelines for living with heart failure to patients, their carers, health care professionals and the general public worldwide. The website is managed by the ESC at the European Heart House and is currently available in nine languages. The aim of this study is to describe the background, objectives, use, lessons learned and future directions of the HFM site. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data on the number of visitor sessions on the site as measured by Google Analytics were used to explore use of the HFM site from 2010 to 2015. Worldwide, the annual number of sessions increased from 416 345 in 2010 to 1 636 368 in 2015. Most users (72-75%) found the site by using a search engine. Desktops and, more recently, smartphones were used to visit the website, accounting for 50% and 38%, respectively, of visits to the site in 2015. CONCLUSIONS: Although its use has increased, the HFM site has not yet reached its full potential: fewer than 2 million users have visited the website, whereas the number of people living with heart failure worldwide is estimated to be 23 million. Uptake and use could be further improved by a continuous process of qualitative assessment of users' preferences, and the provision of professional helpdesk facilities, comprehensive information technology, and promotional support.


Assuntos
Cardiologia/educação , Cuidadores/educação , Educação Profissionalizante/métodos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Internet , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Humanos
6.
Clin Transl Allergy ; 7: 18, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28593040

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Suspected penicillin allergy (Pen-A) is often not verified by diagnostic testing. In third line penicillin allergy labels were associated with prescription of broad spectrum antibiotics, hospital stay duration and readmission. OBJECTIVE: Assess the impact of Pen-A labels on antibiotic and health care use in primary care. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in primary care in the Utrecht area, the Netherlands. All patients registered with a penicillin allergy on 31 December 2013 were selected from the General Practitioner Network database. Each patient with a Pen-A label was matched for age, gender, follow-up period with three patients without Pen-A label. Risk (OR) of receiving a reserve and second choice antibiotic, number and type of antibiotics prescribed during follow-up and number of GP contacts were compared between the two cohorts. RESULTS: Of 196,440 patients, 1254 patients (0.6%) with a Pen-A label were identified and matched with 3756 patients without Pen-A label. Pen-A labels resulted in higher risk of receiving ≥1 antibiotic prescription per year (OR 2.56, 95% CI 2.05-3.20), ≥1 s choice antibiotic prescription per year (OR 2.21 95% CI 1.11-4.40), and ≥4 GP contacts per year (OR 1.71 95% CI 1.46-2.00). The chance of receiving tetracyclins (OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.29-3.89), macrolides/lincosamides/streptogamins (OR 8.69, 95% CI 4.26-17.73) and quinolones (OR 2.59, 95% CI 1.22-5.48) was higher in Pen-A patients. CONCLUSIONS: In primary health care Pen-A labels are associated with increased antibiotic use, including second choice antibiotics, and more health care use.

7.
Fam Pract ; 34(6): 692-696, 2017 11 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28531259

RESUMO

Background: Gastroenteritis (GE) is a common reason for primary care consultation. Dutch clinical practice guidelines (CPG) recommend diagnostic faeces testing (DFT) only in primary care patients with severe illness, comprised immunity or increased transmission risk. For its superior accuracy, shorter turnaround time and ease of use, polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based DFT has largely replaced conventional techniques. It is unknown whether this changed CPG adherence. Objective: To quantify the effect of PCR introduction on adherence to CPG indications for DFT in primary care patients with GE. Methods: We performed a cohort study using routine care data of 225 GPs. Episodes of GE where DFT was performed were extracted from electronic patient records. Presenting symptoms were identified and adherence to CPG indications for DFT assessed in two randomly drawn samples of each 500 patients, one from the period before PCR introduction (2010-11) and one after (2013). The association between PCR introduction and adherence was estimated using multivariable regression analysis. Results: In 88% of all episodes relevant presenting symptoms were reported, most often 'frequent watery stool' (58%) and 'illness duration >10 days' (40%). DFT was performed in 15% of episodes before PCR introduction and in 18% after. Overall, in 17% the DFT request was considered adherent to the CPG, 16% before PCR introduction and 18% after (adjusted OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.9-1.7). Conclusion: Overall adherence to CPG indications when requesting DFT in primary care patient with GE was 17%. Implementation of PCR-based DFT was not associated with a change in CPG adherence.


Assuntos
Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina , Fezes/microbiologia , Gastroenterite , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/normas , Adulto , Diarreia/etiologia , Feminino , Gastroenterite/epidemiologia , Gastroenterite/microbiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos
8.
CMAJ ; 189(2): E56-E63, 2017 Jan 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27647618

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: C-reactive protein (CRP) is increasingly being included in the diagnostic work-up for community-acquired pneumonia in primary care. Its added diagnostic value beyond signs and symptoms, however, remains unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis of individual patient data to quantify the added value of CRP measurement. METHODS: We included studies of the diagnostic accuracy of CRP in adult outpatients with suspected lower respiratory tract infection. We contacted authors of eligible studies for inclusion of data and for additional data as needed. The value of adding CRP measurement to a basic signs-and-symptoms prediction model was assessed. Outcome measures were improvement in discrimination between patients with and without pneumonia in primary care and improvement in risk classification, both within the individual studies and across studies. RESULTS: Authors of 8 eligible studies (n = 5308) provided their data sets. In all of the data sets, discrimination between patients with and without pneumonia improved after CRP measurement was added to the prediction model (extended model), with a mean improvement in the area under the curve of 0.075 (range 0.02-0.18). In a hypothetical cohort of 1000 patients, the proportion of patients without pneumonia correctly classified at low risk increased from 28% to 36% in the extended model, and the proportion with pneumonia correctly classified at high risk increased from 63% to 70%. The number of patients with pneumonia classified at low risk did not change (n = 4). Overall, the proportion of patients assigned to the intermediate-risk category decreased from 56% to 51%. INTERPRETATION: Adding CRP measurement to the diagnostic work-up for suspected pneumonia in primary care improved the discrimination and risk classification of patients. However, it still left a substantial group of patients classified at intermediate risk, in which clinical decision-making remains challenging.

10.
CMAJ ; 189(2): E50-E55, 2017 Jan 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27777252

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Bacterial testing of all patients who present with acute cough is not feasible in primary care. Furthermore, the extent to which easily obtainable clinical information predicts bacterial infection is unknown. We evaluated the diagnostic value of clinical examination and testing for C-reactive protein and procalcitonin for bacterial lower respiratory tract infection. METHODS: Through a European diagnostic study, we recruited 3104 adults with acute cough (≤ 28 days) in primary care settings. All of the patients underwent clinical examination, measurement of C-reactive protein and procalcitonin in blood, and chest radiography. Bacterial infection was determined by conventional culture, polymerase chain reaction and serology, and positive results were defined by the presence of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Bordetella pertussis or Legionella pneumophila. Using multivariable regression analysis, we examined the association of diagnostic variables with the presence of bacterial infection. RESULTS: Overall, 539 patients (17%) had bacterial lower respiratory tract infection, and 38 (1%) had bacterial pneumonia. The only item with diagnostic value for lower respiratory tract infection was discoloured sputum (area under the receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curve 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54-0.59). Adding C-reactive protein above 30 mg/L increased the area under the ROC curve to 0.62 (95% CI 0.59-0.65). For bacterial pneumonia, comorbidity, fever and crackles on auscultation had diagnostic value (area under ROC curve 0.68, 95% CI 0.58-0.77). Adding C-reactive protein above 30 mg/L increased the area under the ROC curve to 0.79 (95% CI 0.71-0.87). Procalcitonin did not add diagnostic information for any bacterial lower respiratory tract infection, including bacterial pneumonia. INTERPRETATION: In adults presenting with acute lower respiratory tract infection, signs, symptoms and C-reactive protein showed diagnostic value for a bacterial cause. However, the ability of these diagnostic indicators to exclude a bacterial cause was limited. Procalcitonin added no clinically relevant information.

11.
Eur J Gen Pract ; 22(4): 219-224, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27485531

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Failure to recruit all eligible study patients can lead to biased results. Little is known on selective patient recruitment in studies on implementation of diagnostic devices. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this observational study was to measure recruitment of patients in an implementation study in primary care on use of point-of-care (POC) C-reactive protein (CRP) and to evaluate recruitment bias and its impact on the study endpoint. METHODS: In a cross-sectional observational study on POC CRP implementation and related antibiotics prescribing, we compared included patients with all eligible patients to assess the representativeness of the included subjects. Eligible patients were adults presenting with acute cough in primary care between March and September 2012. The frequency of POC CRP testing and the proportion of prescribed antibiotics were compared between recruited and non-recruited patients. As measure of bias, odds ratios (ORs) with accompanying 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between CRP level (<20 mg/l or not) and antibiotic prescribing were computed. RESULTS: Of all 1473 eligible patients 348 (24%) were recruited. In recruited patients, POC CRP tests were conducted and antibiotics prescribed more frequently as compared to non-recruited patients (81% versus 6% and 44% versus 29%, respectively). The ORs were 18.2 (95%CI: 9.6-34.3), 30.5 (95%CI: 13.2-70.3) and 3.8 (95%CI: 0.9-14.8) respectively in all eligible patients, the recruited and the non-recruited patients. CONCLUSION: Selective recruitment resulted in an overestimation of POC CRP test use and antibiotic prescribing.


Assuntos
Proteína C-Reativa/análise , Seleção de Pacientes , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Doença Aguda , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Tosse/diagnóstico , Tosse/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Viés de Seleção
12.
Fam Pract ; 33(4): 408-13, 2016 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27230745

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In clinical trials, the potential of point-of-care (POC) C-reactive protein (CRP) tests was demonstrated in decreasing antibiotic prescribing in adults with acute cough in general practice, but effects of implementation are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine the overall effect of POC CRP testing on antibiotic prescribing rate in general practice. METHODS: In an observational study, GPs were instructed to use POC CRP in adults with acute cough following current guidelines. After routine history taking and physical examination, they reported whether they intended to prescribe antibiotics ('pre-test decision'). They reported their revised decision after receiving the POC CRP test result ('post-test decision'). Primary outcome was the percentage of patients in whom the GP changed his or her decision to prescribe antibiotics. Secondary outcome was the difference between 'pre-test' and 'post-test' antibiotic prescribing % at group level. RESULTS: A total of 40 GPs enrolled 939 patients, 78% of whom were tested for CRP. GPs changed their decision after POC CRP testing in 200 patients (27%). Antibiotic prescribing before and after CRP testing did not differ ('pre-test' 31%, 'post-test' 28%; 95% confidence interval of difference -7 to 1). In 41% of the tested patients, the indication for testing was in accordance with the guidelines. CONCLUSION: POC CRP influenced GPs to change their decision about antibiotic prescribing in patients with acute cough. POC CRP testing does not reduce overall antibiotic prescribing by GPs who already have a low antibiotic prescribing rate.


Assuntos
Proteína C-Reativa/análise , Testes Imediatos/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Tosse/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Medicina Geral , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Estudos Prospectivos , Infecções Respiratórias/tratamento farmacológico
13.
PLoS One ; 11(2): e0149895, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26918859

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pneumonia remains difficult to diagnose in primary care. Prediction models based on signs and symptoms (S&S) serve to minimize the diagnostic uncertainty. External validation of these models is essential before implementation into routine practice. In this study all published S&S models for prediction of pneumonia in primary care were externally validated in the individual patient data (IPD) of previously performed diagnostic studies. METHODS AND FINDINGS: S&S models for diagnosing pneumonia in adults presenting to primary care with lower respiratory tract infection and IPD for validation were identified through a systematical search. Six prediction models and IPD of eight diagnostic studies (N total = 5308, prevalence pneumonia 12%) were included. Models were assessed on discrimination and calibration. Discrimination was measured using the pooled Area Under the Curve (AUC) and delta AUC, representing the performance of an individual model relative to the average dataset performance. Prediction models by van Vugt et al. and Heckerling et al. demonstrated the highest pooled AUC of 0.79 (95% CI 0.74-0.85) and 0.72 (0.68-0.76), respectively. Other models by Diehr et al., Singal et al., Melbye et al., and Hopstaken et al. demonstrated pooled AUCs of 0.65 (0.61-0.68), 0.64 (0.61-0.67), 0.56 (0.49-0.63) and 0.53 (0.5-0.56), respectively. A similar ranking was present based on the delta AUCs of the models. Calibration demonstrated close agreement of observed and predicted probabilities in the models by van Vugt et al. and Singal et al., other models lacked such correspondence. The absence of predictors in the IPD on dataset level hampered a systematical comparison of model performance and could be a limitation to the study. CONCLUSIONS: The model by van Vugt et al. demonstrated the highest discriminative accuracy coupled with reasonable to good calibration across the IPD of different study populations. This model is therefore the main candidate for primary care use.


Assuntos
Modelos Biológicos , Pneumonia/diagnóstico , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Área Sob a Curva , Calibragem , Bases de Dados como Assunto , Humanos , Probabilidade , Curva ROC , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
14.
BMC Infect Dis ; 16: 39, 2016 Jan 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26830915

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Infectious intestinal disease (IID) is an important cause of morbidity in developed countries and a frequent reason for general practitioner (GP) consultation. In recent years polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based techniques have gradually replaced conventional enteropathogen detection techniques like microscopy and culture in primary care patients suspected of IID. PCR features testing of multiple enteropathogens in a single faecal sample with shorter turnaround times and greater sensitivity compared to conventional techniques. However, the associated costs and benefits have not been quantified. Furthermore, primary care incidence and prevalence estimates of enteropathogens associated with IID are sparsely available and predominantly based on conventional techniques. The PROUD-study (PCR diagnostics in Outpatients with Diarrhoea) determines: 1) health (care) effects and 2) cost-effectiveness of PCR introduction in primary care patients suspected of IID; 3) occurrence of major enteropathogens in primary care patients suspected of IID. METHODS: A before-after cohort study will be performed of patients with suspected IID consulting a GP in the Utrecht General Practitioner Network (UGPN), covering the before period (2010-2011) with conventional testing and the after period (2013-2014) with PCR testing. Prospective study data on patient characteristics and primary outcome measures (i.e. healthcare use and disease outcome) will be collected from electronic patient and laboratory records in 2015 and 2016. The effect of PCR introduction is investigated by comparing the primary outcome measures and their associated healthcare costs between the conventional period and the PCR period, and is followed by a cost-effectiveness analysis. To determine the occurrence of enteropathogens associated with IID in primary care, routine care faeces samples from the year 2014 will be screened using PCR. DISCUSSION: The PROUD-study will quantify the costs and effects of the introduction of PCR techniques for enteropathogens in primary care patients suspected of IID and generate up-to-date and sensitive estimates of enteropathogen occurrence among primary care patients.


Assuntos
Diarreia/diagnóstico , Fezes/microbiologia , Projetos de Pesquisa , Bactérias/genética , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Estudos de Coortes , Bases de Dados Factuais , Diarreia/microbiologia , Diarreia/virologia , Fezes/virologia , Gastroenterite/epidemiologia , Gastroenterite/microbiologia , Gastroenterite/virologia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Enteropatias/microbiologia , Enteropatias/virologia , Norovirus/genética , Norovirus/isolamento & purificação , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Estudos Prospectivos , Rotavirus/genética , Rotavirus/isolamento & purificação
16.
Ann Fam Med ; 14(6): 534-539, 2016 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28376440

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Bacterial pathogens are assumed to cause an illness course different from that of nonbacterial causes of acute cough, but evidence is lacking. We evaluated the disease course of lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) with a bacterial cause in adults with acute cough. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of a multicenter European trial in which 2,061 adults with acute cough (28 days' duration or less) were recruited from primary care and randomized to amoxicillin or placebo. For this analysis only patients in the placebo group (n = 1,021) were included, reflecting the natural course of disease. Standardized microbiological and serological analyses were performed at baseline to define a bacterial cause. All patients recorded symptoms in a diary for 4 weeks. The disease course between those with and without a bacterial cause was compared by symptom severity in days 2 to 4, duration of symptoms rated moderately bad or worse, and a return consultation. RESULTS: Of 1,021 eligible patients, 187 were excluded for missing diary records, leaving 834 patients, of whom 162 had bacterial LRTI. Patients with bacterial LRTI had worse symptoms at day 2 to 4 after the first office visit (P = .014) and returned more often for a second consultation, 27% vs 17%, than those without bacterial LRTI (P = .004). Resolution of symptoms rated moderately bad or worse did not differ (P = .375). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with acute bacterial LRTI have a slightly worse course of disease when compared with those without an identified bacterial cause, but the relevance of this difference is not meaningful.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Bacterianas/epidemiologia , Progressão da Doença , Infecções Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Doença Aguda , Adulto , Idoso , Amoxicilina/uso terapêutico , Bactérias/classificação , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Comorbidade , Tosse/tratamento farmacológico , Tosse/etiologia , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Radiografia Torácica , Infecções Respiratórias/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Respiratórias/microbiologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Fumar/epidemiologia , Escarro/microbiologia , Fatores de Tempo
17.
Eur J Heart Fail ; 17(12): 1310-6, 2015 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26424105

RESUMO

AIMS: Electronic health support (e-health) may improve self-care of patients with heart failure (HF). We aim to assess whether an adjusted care pathway with replacement of routine consultations by e-health improves self-care as compared with usual care. In addition, we will determine whether the ESC/HFA (European Society of Cardiology/Heart Failure Association) website heartfailurematters.org (HFM website) improves self-care when added to usual care. Finally, we aim to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of these interventions. METHODS: A three-arm parallel randomized trial will be conducted. Arm 1 consists of usual care; arm 2 consists of usual care plus the HFM website; and arm 3 is the adjusted care pathway with an interactive platform for disease management (e-Vita platform), with a link to the HFM website, which replaces routine consultations with HF nurses at the outpatient clinic. In total, 414 patients managed in 10 Dutch HF outpatient clinics or in general practice will be included and followed for 12 months. Participants are included if they have had an established diagnosis of HF for at least 3 months. The primary outcome is self-care as measured by the European Heart Failure Self-care Behaviour scale (EHFScB scale). Secondary outcomes are quality of life, cardiovascular- and HF-related mortality, hospitalization, and its duration as captured by hospital and general practitioner registries, use of and user satisfaction with the HFM website, and cost-effectiveness. PERSPECTIVE: This study will provide important prospective data on the impact and cost-effectiveness of an interactive platform for disease management and the HFM website. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: unique identifier: NCT01755988.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Internet , Autocuidado/métodos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Resultado do Tratamento
18.
BMC Fam Pract ; 16: 130, 2015 Oct 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26446696

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is mainly detected and managed in primary care, but the care is considered suboptimal. We present the rationale, design and baseline results of the Treatment Optimisation in Primary care of Heart failure in the Utrecht region (TOPHU) study. In this study we assess the effect of a single training of GPs in the pharmacological management of patients with HF. METHODS/DESIGN: A cluster randomised controlled trial. Thirty primary care practices are randomly assigned to care as usual or intervention defined as a single training in the up-titration and management of HF drug therapy according to the heart failure guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Patients with a GP's diagnosis of HF will be re-evaluated by an expert panel of two cardiologists and a GP with expertise in HF to come to a definite diagnosis of HF according to the ESC heart failure guidelines. Those with definite HF will be analysed in this study. Drug use will be measured after six months, health status after twelve months, and heart-related hospital admissions and all-cause mortality after two years. DISCUSSION: Our cluster randomised trial will show whether a single training of GPs improves the pharmacological management of patients with HF and confers beneficial effects on health status after one year, and cardiac hospital admissions and all-cause mortality after two years of follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01662323.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Cardiotônicos/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Clínicos Gerais/educação , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Países Baixos , Qualidade de Vida , Projetos de Pesquisa , Resultado do Tratamento
19.
Br J Gen Pract ; 65(639): e662-7, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26412843

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Most cases of adult pertussis probably remain undiagnosed. AIM: To explore the prevalence, diagnosis, and disease course of acute pertussis infection in adult patients presenting with acute cough. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective observational study between 2007 and 2010 in primary care in 12 European countries. METHOD: Adults presenting with acute cough (duration of ≤28 days) were included. Bordetella pertussis infection was determined by polymerase chain reaction (from nasopharyngeal flocked swabs and sputa) and by measurement of immunoglobulin G antibodies to pertussis toxin (PT) in venous blood at day 28. An antibody titre to PT of ≥125 IU/ml or PCR positive result in a respiratory sample defined recent infection. Patients completed a symptom diary for 28 days. RESULTS: Serum and/or respiratory samples were obtained in 3074 patients. Three per cent (93/3074) had recent B. pertussis infection. Prior cough duration >2 weeks discriminated to some extent between those with and without pertussis (adjusted odds ratio 1.89, 95% confidence interval = 1.17 to 3.07; P = 0.010). Median cough duration after presentation was 17 and 12 days in patients with and without pertussis, respectively (P = 0.008). Patients with pertussis had longer duration of phlegm production (P = 0.010), shortness of breath (P = 0.037), disturbed sleep (P = 0.013) and interference with normal activities or work (P = 0.033) after presentation. CONCLUSION: Pertussis infection plays a limited role among adults presenting with acute cough in primary care, but GPs should acknowledge the possibility of pertussis in uncomplicated lower respiratory tract infection. As in children, pertussis also causes prolonged symptoms in adults. However, pertussis is difficult to discern from other acute cough syndromes in adults at first presentation.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antibacterianos/sangue , Bordetella pertussis/isolamento & purificação , Tosse/diagnóstico , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Toxina Pertussis/sangue , Coqueluche/diagnóstico , Adulto , Tosse/etiologia , Tosse/microbiologia , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G/imunologia , Toxina Pertussis/imunologia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Prevalência , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Estudos Prospectivos , Coqueluche/epidemiologia
20.
BMC Pulm Med ; 15: 83, 2015 Jul 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26228243

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The maximal expiratory flow at 50 % of the forced vital capacity (MEF50) is the flow where half of forced vital capacity (FVC) remains to be exhaled. A reduced MEF50 has been suggested as a surrogate marker of small airways disease. The diagnostic and prognostic utility of this easy to assess spirometric variable in persons with respiratory symptoms, but without COPD is unclear. METHODS: We used data from the UHFO-COPD cohort in which 405 community-dwelling persons aged 65 years or over, and a general practitioner's diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) underwent pulmonary function testing and echocardiography. In total 161 patients had no COPD according to the spirometric GOLD criteria. We considered MEF50 as reduced if < 60 % of predicted. RESULTS: Of the 161 patients without COPD (mean age 72 ± 5.7 years; 35 % male; follow-up 4.5 ± 1.1 years), 61 (37.9 %) had a reduced MEF50. They were older, had more pack-years of smoking, more respiratory symptoms, and used more frequently inhaled medication than the remaining 100 subjects. A reduced MEF50 was nearly twice as often associated with newly detected heart failure (HF) at assessment (29.5 % vs. 15.6 %, p = 0.045). In age-and sex-adjusted Cox regression analysis, a reduced MEF50 was significantly associated with episodes of acute bronchitis (hazard ratio 2.54 95 % confidence interval (1.26; 5.13) P = 0.009), and in trend with pneumonia (2.14 (0.98; 4.69) P = 0.06) and hospitalizations for pulmonary reasons (2.28 (0.93; 5.62) P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: In older community-dwelling persons with pulmonary symptoms but without COPD, a reduced MEF50 may help to uncover unrecognized HF, and identify those at a higher risk for episodes of acute bronchitis, pneumonia and hospitalizations for pulmonary reasons. Echocardiography and close follow-up should be considered in these patients.


Assuntos
Expiração/fisiologia , Volume Expiratório Forçado/fisiologia , Pulmão/fisiopatologia , Doenças Respiratórias/diagnóstico , Capacidade Vital/fisiologia , Idoso , Ecocardiografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Prognóstico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Testes de Função Respiratória/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças Respiratórias/fisiopatologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...