Reassessment of Postural Stimulation Testing as a Simple Tool to Identify a Subgroup of Patients With Unilateral Primary Aldosteronism.

CONTEXT: Adrenal vein sampling (AVS) represents the current diagnostic gold standard for differentiation between unilateral and bilateral primary aldosteronism (PA). Postural stimulation testing (PST) has been used to provide additional diagnostic information. OBJECTIVE: This work aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of PST in the differential diagnosis of PA. METHODS: This cohort study was conducted at a single tertiary reference center. We analyzed 106 PST performed between 2008 and 2020. Diagnosis of PA and cause of PA were determined according to the Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline, taking into account results of saline infusion testing, AVS, preoperative imaging, and outcome after medical or surgical treatment. The suggested cutoffs for the diagnosis of unilateral PA were revisited and optimized for high specificity using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: A total of 106 patients had confirmed PA (unilateral PA: n = 55, bilateral PA: n = 29, AVS unsuccessful/declined by patients: n = 22). Based on decreased aldosterone plasma concentration of 28% or more after 4 hours in the upright position, the PST showed a sensitivity of 36.4% at a specificity of 100% to identify unilateral disease (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.62-0.83; P = .001). In patients with valid testing (drop of cortisol of 10% or more after 4 hours, n = 53) the sensitivity of PST rose to 51.4% at a specificity of 100% (AUC = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.65-0.90; P = .001). CONCLUSION: The high specificity of 100% for the detection of unilateral PA in patients with decreased aldosterone by at least 28% after 4 hours makes PST a simple, noninvasive contribution to subtype differentiation in PA.

Confirmatory testing of primary aldosteronism with saline infusion test and LC-MS/MS.

OBJECTIVE: Saline infusion testing (SIT) for confirmation of primary aldosteronism (PA) is based on impaired aldosterone suppression in PA compared to essential hypertension (EH). In the past, aldosterone was quantified using immunoassays (IA). Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is increasingly used in clinical routine. We aimed at a method-specific aldosterone threshold for the diagnosis of PA during SIT and explored the diagnostic utility of steroid panel analysis. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of 187 paired SIT samples (2009-2018). Diagnosis of PA (n = 103) and EH (n = 84) was established based on clinical routine workup without using LC-MS/MS values. SETTING: Tertiary care center. METHODS: LC-MS/MS using a commercial steroid panel. Receiver operator characteristics analysis was used to determine method-specific cut-offs using a positive predictive value (PPV) of 90% as criterion. RESULTS: Aldosterone measured by IA was on average 31 ng/L higher than with LC-MS/MS. The cut-offs for PA confirmation were 54 ng/L for IA (sensitivity: 95%, 95% CI: 89.0-98.4; specificity: 87%, 95% CI: 77.8-93.3; area under the curve (AUC): 0.955, 95% CI: 0.924-0.986; PPV: 90%, 95% CI: 83.7-93.9) and 69 ng/L for LC-MS/MS (79%, 95% CI: 69.5-86.1; 89%, 95% CI: 80.6-95.0; 0.902, 95% CI: 0.857-0.947; 90%, 95% CI: 82.8-94.4). Other steroids did not improve SIT. CONCLUSIONS: Aldosterone quantification with LC-MS/MS and IA yields comparable SIT-cut-offs. Lower AUC for LC-MS/MS is likely due to the spectrum of disease in PA and previous decision making based on IA results. Until data of a prospective trial with clinical endpoints are available, the suggested cut-off can be used in clinical routine.