Management of iron-deficiency anemia following acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage: A narrative analysis and review.

Many patients experiencing acute gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) require iron supplementation to treat subsequent iron deficiency (ID) or iron-deficiency anemia (IDA). Guidelines regarding management of these patients are lacking. We aimed to identify areas of unmet need in patients with ID/IDA following acute GIB in terms of patient management and physician guidance. We formed an international working group of gastroenterologists to conduct a narrative review based on PubMed and EMBASE database searches (from January 2000 to February 2021), integrated with observations from our own clinical experience. Published data on this subject are limited and disparate, and those relating to post-discharge outcomes, such as persistent anemia and re-hospitalization, are particularly lacking. Often, there is no post-discharge follow-up of these patients by a gastroenterologist. Acute GIB-related ID/IDA, however, is a prevalent condition both at the time of hospital admission and at hospital discharge and is likely underdiagnosed and undertreated. Despite limited data, there appears to be notable variation in the prescribing of intravenous (IV)/oral iron regimens. There is also some evidence suggesting that, compared with oral iron, IV iron may restore iron levels faster following acute GIB, have a better tolerability profile, and be more beneficial in terms of quality of life. Gaps in patient care exist in the management of acute GIB-related ID/IDA, yet further data from large population-based studies are needed to confirm this. We advocate the formulation of evidence-based guidance on the use of iron therapies in these patients, aiding a more standardized best-practice approach to patient care.

Correction to: Risk of dementia among postmenopausal breast cancer survivors treated with aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen: a cohort study using primary care data from the UK.

The article Risk of dementia among postmenopausal breast cancer survivors treated with aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen: a cohort study using primary care data from the UK, written by Susan E. Bromley, was originally published electronically on the publisher's internet portal.

Risk of dementia among postmenopausal breast cancer survivors treated with aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen: a cohort study using primary care data from the UK.

PURPOSE: Among a cohort of postmenopausal breast cancer survivors, we aimed to compare the risk of dementia associated with aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy versus tamoxifen. METHODS: Using UK primary care electronic health records, we identified 14,214 postmenopausal breast cancer survivors (aged ≥ 54 years) with a first AI or tamoxifen prescription between January 2002 and December 2015 and no previous dementia diagnosis. Women were followed-up to identify incident cases of dementia. Cox regression was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to quantify the association between AI exposure (vs. tamoxifen) and dementia, adjusted for confounders. RESULTS: A total of 368 incident dementia cases was identified over 57,102 person-years of follow-up. The crude incidence rate of dementia was 7.46 per 1000 person-years (95% CI 6.43-8.65) among women starting endocrine treatment on an AI, and 6.32 per 1000 person-years (95% CI 5.34-7.47) among women starting on tamoxifen. After accounting for age differences and assessing other potential confounders, there was no evidence of a difference in dementia risk between exposure groups (HR for AI vs tamoxifen 1.04, 95% CI 0.83-1.03). There was no evidence of effect modification by age. CONCLUSION: There was no evidence for a difference in dementia risk between AI and tamoxifen users among postmenopausal breast cancer survivors. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Our findings suggest that there is no reason for concern about a difference in dementia risk with AI vs. tamoxifen, which is relevant to postmenopausal breast cancer patients recommended these treatments.

Low-dose aspirin and risk of intracranial bleeds: An observational study in UK general practice.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the risk of intracranial bleeds (ICBs) associated with new use of prophylactic low-dose aspirin using a population-based primary care database in the United Kingdom. METHODS: A cohort of new users of low-dose aspirin (75-300 mg; n = 199,079) aged 40-84 years and a 1:1 matched cohort of nonusers of low-dose aspirin at baseline were followed (maximum 14 years, median 5.4 years) to identify incident cases of ICB, with validation by manual review of patient records or linkage to hospitalization data. Using 10,000 frequency-matched controls, adjusted rate ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for current low-dose aspirin use (0-7 days before the index date [ICB date for cases, random date for controls]); reference group was never used. RESULTS: There were 1,611 cases of ICB (n = 743 for intracerebral hemorrhage [ICH], n = 483 for subdural hematoma [SDH], and n = 385 for subarachnoid hemorrhage [SAH]). RRs (95% CI) were 0.98 (0.84-1.13) for all ICB, 0.98 (0.80-1.20) for ICH, 1.23 (0.95-1.59) for SDH, and 0.77 (0.58-1.01) for SAH. No duration of use or dose-response association was apparent. RRs (95% CI) for ≥1 year of low-dose aspirin use were 0.90 (0.72-1.13) for ICH, 1.20 (0.91-1.57) for SDH, and 0.69 (0.50-0.94) for SAH. CONCLUSION: Low-dose aspirin is not associated with an increased risk of any type of ICB and is associated with a significantly decreased risk of SAH when used for ≥1 year.

New use of low-dose aspirin and risk of colorectal cancer by stage at diagnosis: a nested case-control study in UK general practice.

BACKGROUND: Evidence from clinical trial populations suggests low-dose aspirin reduces the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Part of this reduction in risk might be due to protection against metastatic disease. METHODS: We investigated the risk of CRC among new-users of low-dose aspirin (75-300 mg), including risk by stage at diagnosis. Using The Health Improvement Network, we conducted a cohort study with nested case-control analysis. Two cohorts (N = 170,336 each) aged 40-89 years from 2000 to 2009 and free of cancer were identified: i) new-users of low-dose aspirin, ii) non-users of low-dose aspirin, at start of follow-up, matched by age, sex and previous primary care practitioner visits. Patients were followed for up to 12 years to identify incident CRC. 10,000 frequency-matched controls were selected by incidence density sampling where the odds ratio is an unbiased estimator of the incidence rate ratio (RR). RRs with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Low-dose aspirin use was classified 'as-treated' independent from baseline exposure status to account for changes in exposure during follow-up. RESULTS: Current users of low-dose aspirin (use on the index date or in the previous 90 days) had a significantly reduced risk of CRC, RR 0.66 (95% CI 0.60-0.74). The reduction in risk was apparent across all age groups, and was unrelated to dose, indication, gender, CRC location or case-fatality status. Reduced risks occurred throughout treatment duration and with all low-dose aspirin doses. RRs by aspirin indication were 0.71 (0·63-0·79) and 0.60 (0.53-0.68) for primary and secondary cardiovascular protection, respectively. Among cases with staging information (n = 1421), RRs for current use of low-dose aspirin were 0.94 (0.66-1.33) for Dukes Stage A CRC, 0.54 (0.42-0.68) for Dukes B, 0.71 (0.56-0.91) for Dukes C, and 0.60 (0.48-0.74) for Dukes D. After 5 years' therapy, the RR for Dukes Stage A CRC was 0.53 (0.24-1.19). CONCLUSIONS: Patients starting low-dose aspirin therapy have a reduced risk of Stages B-D CRC, suggesting a role for low-dose aspirin in the progression of established CRC; a substantial reduction in the risk of Dukes A CRC may occur after 5 years' therapy.

Pulmonary hypertension in childhood interstitial lung disease: A systematic review of the literature.

Childhood interstitial lung disease (chILD) comprises a wide heterogeneous group of rare parenchymal lung disorders associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Pulmonary hypertension is a common comorbidity in adults with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and associated with poor survival. We aimed to systematically review the literature regarding the occurrence of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in chILD, its effect on prognosis and healthcare use, and its treatment in clinical practice. Searches of PubMed and EMBASE databases (up to February 2016), and American Thoracic Society conference abstracts (2009-2015) were conducted using relevant keywords. References from selected articles and review papers were scanned to identify further relevant articles. A total of 20 articles were included; estimates of PH in chILD ranged from 1% to 64% with estimates among specific chILD entities ranging from 0% to 43%. Comparisons between studies were limited by differences in the study populations, including the size, age range, and heterogeneous composition of the ILD case series in terms of the nature and severity of the clinical entities, and also the methods used to diagnose PH. Three studies found that among patients with chILD, those with PH had a significantly higher risk (up to sevenfold) of death compared with those without PH. Information on the treatment of pulmonary hypertension in chILD or the effect of PH on healthcare use was not available. Data on the use and effectiveness of treatments for pulmonary hypertension in chILD are required to address this area of unmet need. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2017;52:689-698. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Hormone replacement therapy and risk of acute myocardial infarction : a review of the literature.

Many animal studies and studies on intermediate clinical endpoints have shown hormone replacement therapy (HRT) to be associated with both favourable and unfavourable cardiovascular effects. We reviewed the literature regarding HRT and the distinct endpoint of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in peri- and postmenopausal women. Searches of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were conducted. Fifty papers were identified as eligible for inclusion: eight randomised controlled trials, 18 cohort studies, 23 case-control studies and one case-control and cohort study. The single large primary prevention randomised controlled trial on HRT and the risk of AMI in generally healthy women (Women's Health Initiative trial) reported a small yet significantly increased risk of AMI in postmenopausal women receiving combined HRT. This contrasts with a large number of observational studies that suggested a protective effect, although in many of these studies the results were not statistically significant. Inconclusive evidence on the effect of duration of use does not support the notion that a possible protective association is causal. Detection bias and residual confounding are alternative explanations for the associations observed in the randomised controlled trial and observational studies. No studies on groups of women with existing cardiovascular disease or with diabetes mellitus, including the only large secondary prevention trial (Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study), reported a significant change in AMI risk between HRT users and non-users. There is insufficient evidence to suggest that HRT is associated with a change in the risk of AMI in the majority of women. However, certain subgroups of women with specific genetic polymorphisms may be more susceptible to a change in the risk of AMI with HRT use.

Tibolone and endometrial cancer: a cohort and nested case-control study in the UK.

OBJECTIVE: Case series and spontaneous reports of endometrial cancer have raised the question as to whether the use of tibolone (introduced into the UK in 1991) is associated with an increased risk of endometrial cancer. This study set out to evaluate whether tibolone use is associated with an increased risk of endometrial cancer. METHODS: Age-adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of endometrial cancer were calculated for tibolone use compared with the use of other hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Separate sets of controls, matched for age and general practice, were compared with cases, all nested within a cohort of HRT users identified from the UK General Practice Research Database (GPRD). Conditional logistic regression analysis, adjusted for potential confounders, was used to study the association between tibolone use and the risk of endometrial cancer. RESULTS: 4995 women used tibolone as their first HRT product; 10 783 (4.3%) of the users of combined HRT had changed to tibolone at some time during the study period. Amongst women whose HRT began with tibolone, the age-adjusted IRR relative to those who started with combined sequential HRT was 1.83 (95% CI 1.19, 2.82). The nested case-control study comprised 162 cases, each matched to two sets of 972 controls. There were 43 tibolone-exposed subjects, 28 of whom had used other HRT before or after tibolone. The adjusted odds ratio of the risk of endometrial cancer in women who had ever used tibolone, compared with users of combined sequential HRT, was 1.54 (95% CI 1.03, 2.32) in the age-matched set and 1.58 (95% CI 1.01, 2.47) in the practice-matched set. Sensitivity analyses did not decrease the risk estimates found. DISCUSSION: Tibolone may be associated with an increased risk of endometrial cancer compared with conventional forms of HRT, but our data are fragile. Residual bias and uncontrolled confounding cannot be excluded, and follow-up time is insufficient to draw any firm conclusions with respect to the endometrial safety of tibolone.