Informed choice and routinization of the second-trimester anomaly scan: a national cohort study in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: Since 2007 all pregnant women in the Netherlands are offered the second-trimester anomaly scan (SAS) in a nationwide prenatal screening program. This study aims to assess the level of informed choice of women opting for the SAS and to evaluate the presence of routinization 16 years after its implementation. It further explores decisional conflict and women's decision making. METHODS: This prospective national survey study consisted of an online questionnaire which was completed after prenatal counseling and before undergoing the SAS. Informed choice was measured by the adapted multidimensional measure of informed choice (MMIC) and was defined in case women were classified as value-consistent, if their decision for the SAS was deliberated and made with sufficient knowledge. RESULTS: A total of 894/1167 (76.6%) women completed the questionnaire. Overall, 54.8% made an informed choice, 89.6% had good knowledge, 59.8% had deliberated their choice and 92.7% held a positive attitude towards the SAS. Women with low educational attainment (p=0.004) or respondents of non-Western descent (p=0.038) were less likely to make an informed choice. Decisional conflict was low, with a significantly lower decisional conflict score in women that made an informed choice (p<0.001). Most respondents (97.9%) did not perceive pressure to undergo the SAS. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed a relatively low rate of informed choice for the SAS, due to absence of deliberation. Therefore, some routinization seem to be present in the Netherlands. However, most women had sufficient knowledge, did not perceive pressure and experienced low decisional conflict.

Current practice of first-trimester ultrasound screening for structural fetal anomalies in developed countries.

OBJECTIVES: First-trimester ultrasound screening is increasingly performed to detect fetal anomalies early in pregnancy, aiming to enhance reproductive autonomy for future parents. This study aims to display the current practice of first-trimester ultrasound screening in developed countries. METHOD: An online survey among 47 prenatal screening experts in developed countries. RESULTS: First-trimester structural anomaly screening is available in 30 of the 33 countries and is mostly offered to all women with generally high uptakes. National protocols are available in 23/30 (76.7%) countries, but the extent of anatomy assessment varies. Monitoring of scan quality occurs in 43.3% of the countries. 23/43 (53.5%) of the respondents considered the quality of first-trimester ultrasound screening unequal in different regions of their country. CONCLUSIONS: First-trimester screening for structural fetal anomalies is widely offered in developed countries, but large differences are reported in availability and use of screening protocols, the extent of anatomy assessment, training and experience of sonographers and quality monitoring systems. Consequently, this results in an unequal offer to parents in developed countries, sometimes even within the same country. Furthermore, as offer and execution differ widely, this has to be taken into account when results of screening policies are scientifically published or compared.

Short report: Post-operative wound infections after the gentle caesarean section.

OBJECTIVES: Worldwide, the caesarean section (CS) is the most performed type of surgery and numbers are still rising. The gentle CS has become a more common procedure as it allows the parents to experience birth. Early and continuous skin-to-skin contact between the mother and her newborn is pursued. Parents are not separated from their newborns and stay with their child in the operation theatre and recovery room. However, data are limited on the incidence of surgical site infections (SSI) after gentle CS. The aim of our study was to examine the risk of postoperative wound infections after gentle CS. Secondary outcomes included other maternal complications and neonatal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: In this multicenter prospective cohort study, all women who underwent an elective gentle CS between January 2015 and January 2017 were eligible. Demographics, per procedural data, maternal complications and neonatal outcomes were collected. The follow-up lasted until six weeks post partum. RESULTS: Of the 243 performed CSs, two (0.8%) SSIs occurred; one superficial and one deep wound infection. One patient (0.4%) was readmitted for treatment of endometritis. In total, 20 (8.2%) maternal complications were identified. Median time to skin-to-skin contact was 3 minutes (IQR 2-4.25) with a median neonatal oxygen saturation 10 minutes after birth of 95% (IQR 92-98). Mean gestational age was 274 ±â€¯4.1 days (39 + 1 weeks) and mean neonatal pH was 7.28 (±SD 0.07). All children had Apgar scores >7 at 5 minutes after birth. Neonatal admission occurred in 19 cases (7.8%) and neonatal readmission in 10 cases (4.1%). CONCLUSION: The gentle CS seems to be a safe procedure for both mother and child and is not associated with an increased risk of surgical site infections or direct suboptimal neonatal outcomes. Therefore, more intensive mother-child interaction during CS is allowed.