Postoperative Opioid-Prescribing Practice in Limb Preservation Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Limb preservation surgery affects more than 100,000 Americans annually. Current postoperative pain management prescribing practices of podiatric physicians in the United States are understudied. We examined prescribing practices for limb preservation surgery to identify prescriber characteristics' that may be associated with postoperative opioid-prescribing practices. METHODS: We administered an anonymous online questionnaire consisting of five patient scenarios with limb preservation surgery commonly performed by podiatric physicians. Respondents provided information about their prescription choice for each surgery. Basic provider demographics were collected. We developed linear regression models to identify the strength and direction of association between prescriber characteristics and quantity of postoperative opioid "pills" (dosage units) prescribed at surgery. Logistic regression models were used to identify the odds of prescribing opioids for each scenario. RESULTS: One hundred fifteen podiatric physicians completed the survey. Podiatric physicians reported using regional nerve blocks 70% to 88% of the time and prescribing opioids 43% to 67% of the time across all scenarios. Opioids were more commonly prescribed than nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and anticonvulsants. Practicing in the Northeast United States was a significant variable in linear regression (P = .009, a decrease of 9-10 dosage units) and logistic regression (odds ratio, 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.68; P = .008) models for the transmetatarsal amputation scenario. CONCLUSIONS: Prescribing practice variation exists in limb preservation surgery by region. Podiatric physicians reported using preoperative regional nerve blocks more than prescribing postoperative opioids for limb preservation surgeries. Through excess opioid prescribing, the diabetes pandemic has likely contributed to the US opioid epidemic. Podiatric physicians stand at the intersection of these two public health crises and are equipped to reduce their impact via preventive foot care and prescribing nonopioid analgesics when warranted.

Evidence-Based Opioid Education That Reduces Prescribing: The 10 Principles of Opioid Prescribing in Foot and Ankle Surgery.

Over half of opioid misusers last obtained access to opioids via a friend or relative, a problematic reflection of the opioid reservoir phenomenon, which results from an unused backlog of excess prescription opioids that are typically stored in the American home. We aim to determine if a voluntary educational intervention containing standard opioid and nonopioid analgesic prescribing ranges for common surgeries is effective in altering postoperative prescribing practice. We utilized a mixed methods approach and sent out a questionnaire to American podiatric physicians, including residents (baseline group A), via email in early 2020 for baseline data; then, we interviewed foot and ankle surgeons and the primary themes of these semistructured interviews informed us to target residents for an educational intervention. We repeated the survey 3 years later in summer 2022 (preintervention group B). We created an opioid guide and emailed it to residents in fall 2022. Another repeat survey was done in spring 2023 (postintervention group C). We used the Mann-Whitney U test to examine differences between the groups among their reported postoperative opioid quantities for a first metatarsal osteotomy surgical scenario. Groups A, B, and C had 60, 100, and 99 residents, respectively. There was no significant difference (p = .9873) between baseline group A and preintervention group B. There was a difference (p < .0001; -5 median) between preintervention group B and postintervention group C (same residency year). In postintervention group C, a majority (91/99) reported viewing the guide at least once, and the number of residents that reported supplementing with NSAIDs also doubled compared to preintervention group B. This novel opioid educational intervention resulted in meaningful change in self-reported postoperative prescribing behavior among residents.

American Podiatric Surgeons' Postoperative Multimodal Analgesic-Prescribing Practice: A 2019-2020 National Survey.

BACKGROUND: Surgery is a common setting for opioid-naive patients to first be exposed to opioids. Understanding the multimodal analgesic-prescribing habits of podiatric surgeons in the United States may be helpful to refining prescribing protocols. The purpose of this benchmark study was to identify whether certain demographic characteristics of podiatric surgeons were associated with their postoperative multimodal analgesic-prescribing practices. METHODS: We administered a scenario-based, voluntary, anonymous, online questionnaire that consisted of patient scenarios with a unique podiatric surgery followed by a demographics section. We developed multiple logistic regression models to identify associations between prescriber characteristics and the odds of supplementing with a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, regional nerve block, and anticonvulsant agent for each scenario. We developed multiple linear regression models to identify the association of multimodal analgesic-prescribing habits and the opioid dosage units prescribed at the time of surgery. RESULTS: Eight hundred sixty podiatric surgeons completed the survey. Years in practice was a statistically significant variable in multiple scenarios. Compared with those in practice for more than 15 years, podiatric surgeons in practice 5 years or less had increased odds of reporting supplementation with an anticonvulsant agent in scenarios 1 (odds ratio [OR], 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-5.18; P = .03), 3 (OR, 2.97; 95% CI, 1.55-5.68; P = .001), 4 (OR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.56-4.12; P < .001), and 5 (OR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.29-3.32; P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Podiatric surgeons with fewer years in practice had increased odds of supplementing with an anticonvulsant. Approximately one-third of podiatric surgeons reported using some form of a nonopioid analgesic and an opioid in every scenario. The use of multimodal analgesics was associated with a reduction in the number of opioid dosage units prescribed at the time of surgery and may be a reasonable adjunct to current protocols.

The Anesthetic Effects of Lidocaine with Epinephrine in Digital Nerve Blocks: A Systematic Review.

There is a long-standing stigma associated with the use of epinephrine in digital nerve blocks (DNBs) over the concern of digital necrosis. We conducted a systematic review to assess the duration of anesthesia, onset of anesthesia, and complications of lidocaine with epinephrine compared with plain lidocaine for DNBs in adults. We searched Medline via Ovid, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov on January 28, 2020. We included randomized controlled trials that examined lidocaine with epinephrine 1:80,000 to 1:1,000,000 (1-12.5 µg/mL) and plain lidocaine for DNBs of fingers or toes in adults. We completed a blinded review of all unique articles, followed by full-text reviews, data extraction, and quality assessment of all eligible trials. Risk of bias was assessed to inform qualitative data analysis. We identified seven studies with a combined 363 adults and 442 DNBs that met the inclusion criteria. All five studies that reported duration of anesthesia established longer duration in the epinephrine-supplemented lidocaine group, with significant increases in three. Two of the three studies that reported the onset of anesthesia demonstrated significant differences. The two studies that reported complications did not have a single case of digital necrosis. In adults, the use of lidocaine with epinephrine 1:80,000 to 1:1,000,000 (1-12.5 µg/mL) for DNB yields a longer duration of anesthetic effect and seems to be as safe as plain lidocaine in healthy adults. Several studies had some concern for bias, and additional studies are warranted.

The Diabetic Foot-Pain-Depression Cycle.

BACKGROUND: More than 86,000 Americans with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) undergo nontraumatic lower-extremity amputations annually. The opioid-prescribing practice of podiatric surgeons remains understudied. We hypothesized that patients with T2DM who undergo any forefoot amputation while using antidepressant medication will have reduced odds of using opioids beyond 7 days. METHODS: We completed a retrospective cohort study examining patients with T2DM who underwent forefoot amputation (toe, ray, transmetatarsal). Data were restricted to patients with a hemoglobin A1c level less than 8.0% and an ankle-brachial index greater than 0.8. The outcome was use of postoperative opioids beyond 7 days. Patients received an initial opioid prescription of 7 days or less. We developed simple logistic regression models to identify the odds of a patient using opioids beyond 7 days by patient variables: age, race, sex, amputation level, body mass index, antidepressant medication use, and marital status. Variables with P < .1 in the univariate analysis were included in the multiple logistic regression model. RESULTS: Fifty patients met the inclusion criteria. Antidepressant use and marital status were the only statistically significant variables. Adjusting for marital status, patients with antidepressant use had decreased odds (odds ratio, 0.018; 95% confidence interval, 0.001-0.229; P = .002) of using opioids beyond 7 days after a diabetic forefoot amputation. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with T2DM who used antidepressants had significantly reduced odds of using opioids beyond 1 week after forefoot amputations compared with those without antidepressant use. We proposed an underlying diabetic foot-pain-depression cycle. To break the cycle, podiatric surgeons should screen this population for depression preoperatively and postoperatively and not hesitate to make a mental health referral if warranted. Nontraumatic amputations can be a traumatic experience for patients; psychiatrists and other mental health providers should be members of limb preservation teams.

Cognitive Bias in Postoperative Opioid-Prescribing Practice.

BACKGROUND: Given that excess opioid prescriptions contribute to the US opioid epidemic and there are few national opioid-prescribing guidelines for the management of acute pain, it is pertinent to determine whether prescribers can sufficiently assess their own prescribing practice. We investigated podiatric surgeons' ability to evaluate whether their own opioid-prescribing practice is less than, near, or above that of an "average" prescriber. METHODS: We administered a scenario-based, voluntary, anonymous, online questionnaire consisting of five surgery-based scenarios commonly performed by podiatric surgeons. Respondents were asked the quantity of opioids they would prescribe at the time of surgery. Respondents were also asked to rate their prescribing practice compared with the average (median) podiatric surgeon. We compared self-reported behavior to self-reported perception ("I prescribe less than average," "I prescribed about average," and "I prescribe more than average"). Analysis of variance was used for univariate analysis among the three groups. We used linear regression to adjust for confounders. Data restriction was used to account for restrictive state laws. RESULTS: One hundred fifteen podiatric surgeons completed the survey in April 2020. Less than half of the time, respondents accurately identified their own category. Consequently, there were no statistically significant differences among podiatric surgeons who reported that they "prescribe less," "prescribe about average," and "prescribe more." Paradoxically, there was a flip in scenario 5: respondents who reported they "prescribe more" actually prescribed the least and respondents who believed they "prescribe less" actually prescribed the most. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive bias, in the form of a novel effect, occurs in postoperative opioid-prescribing practice; in the absence of procedure-specific guidelines or an objective standard, podiatric surgeons, more often than not, were unaware of how their own opioid-prescribing practice measured up to that of other podiatric surgeons.

Postoperative Opioid-Prescribing Practice in Foot and Ankle Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 3,900 Americans die every month of opioid overdose. The total economic burden of the opioid epidemic is estimated to be more than $78 billion annually. We sought to determine whether postoperative opioid-prescribing practice variation exists in foot and ankle surgery. METHODS: We administered a voluntary, anonymous, online questionnaire consisting of six foot and ankle surgery scenarios followed by a demographics section. The purpose of the demographics section was to gather characteristics of podiatric foot and ankle surgeons. We invited podiatric foot and ankle surgeons practicing in the United States to complete the questionnaire via e-mail from the American Podiatric Medical Association's membership list. For each scenario, respondents selected the postoperative opioid(s) that they would prescribe at the time of surgery, as well as the dose, frequency, and number of "pills" (dosage units). We developed multiple linear regression models to identify associations between prescriber characteristics and two measures of opioid quantity: dosage units and morphine milligram equivalents. RESULTS: Eight hundred sixty podiatric foot and ankle surgeons completed the survey. The median number of dosage units never exceeded 30 regardless of the foot and ankle surgery. Years in practice correlated with reduction in dosage units at the time of surgery. Compared with the orthopedic community, podiatric foot and ankle surgeons prescribe approximately 25% less dosage units than orthopedic foot and ankle surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative opioid-prescribing practice variation exists in foot and ankle surgery. Further research is warranted to determine whether additional education is needed for young surgeons.

Explaining gender segregation.

Occupational gender segregation--the tendency for women and men to work in different occupations--is an important feature of all societies, and particularly the wealthy industrialized ones. To understand this segregation, and to explain its significance, we need to distinguish between vertical segregation entailing inequality and horizontal segregation representing difference without inequality, with overall segregation being the resultant of these components. Three major theoretical approaches to understanding occupational gender segregation are examined: human capital/rational choice, patriarchy, and preference theories. All are found to be inadequate; they tend to confuse overall segregation with its vertical component, and each entails a number of other faults. It is generally assumed or implied that greater empowerment of women would reduce gender segregation. This is the reverse of what actually happens; in countries where the degree of women's empowerment is greater, the level of gender segregation is also greater. An alternative theoretical approach based on processes of social reproduction is shown to be more useful.