Sleep disturbances in elderly: a subjective evaluation over 65.

Sleep in elderly people shows progressive changes caused by general aging processes. Several alterations are described in medical literature: changes of sleep/wake rhythm and modifications both in sleep duration and in sleep architecture. The aim of our study was to evaluate sleep disturbances in elderly people, with and without cognitive impairment,through a sleep questionnaire. Our population included 1000 subjects, over 65 years of age, stratified by sex and age. The first 600 interviews were included in this report. All patients underwent a mini mental state examination (MMSE) and a questionnaire concerning excessive daytime sleepiness. In our total sample, we found a high prevalence of excessive daytime sleepiness, insomnia, nighttime awakenings, snoring, restlessness and periodic leg movements during sleep. Patients with cognitive dysfunctions showed less difficulty in falling asleep and fewer nighttime awakenings; they snored less frequently and were the only ones to present enuresis and to fall off the bed. Moreover, patients with cognitive impairment presented excessive daytime sleepiness with variable intensity and frequency. In conclusion, our results indicate significant differences in sleep disorders between healthy subjects and patients cognitively impaired. Besides, our subjective evaluation seems to be a useful method to perform an assessment of sleep disturbances in elderly people.

Lormetazepam effects on daytime vigilance, psychomotor performance and simulated driving in young adult healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the residual effects of lormetazepam on daytime vigilance, psychomotor performance and simulated driving in adult healthy volunteers. MATERIAL: Twelve subjects (7 women, 5 men), aged 27 - 38 years (mean 31). METHOD: Subjects received lormetazepam 1 mg tablet and placebo for 3 days at nighttime in a randomized, double-blind, crossover design, with a 1-week interval between medications. On the morning following the last drug administration, the subjects completed a 15-min battery of neuropsychological tests aimed at assessing memory and attention, performed simple and choice visual reaction times, and self-rated their own level of sleepiness using the Epworth sleepiness scale. Afterwards, an interactive, computer-based driving simulator (STISIM) was used to assess the effect of the study drugs on driving ability, followed by the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT). RESULTS: The findings showed that participants had similar performance when treated with lormetazepam and placebo. Indeed, as compared with baseline, neuropsychological tests, visual reaction times, sleep latency using the MSLT and driving ability showed no deterioration following either placebo or active medication. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that 3-day use of lormetazepam 1 mg/day neither influences daytime vigilance nor impairs psychomotor task performance and simulated driving. Results confirm previous evidence that the intermediate-acting hypnotic benzodiazepine lormetazepam is devoid of residual effects in respect to psychomotor ability. However, caution should be exercised in the interpretation of the results due to the limited sensitivity of the study.

Mexiletine in the treatment of torticollis and generalized dystonia.

Mexiletine is an antiarrhythmic drug that has been reported to exert antidystonic properties. We performed an open-label study to collect further evidence of the antidystonic effect of mexiletine in spasmodic torticollis (ST) and to evaluate its possible use in generalized dystonia. We administered mexiletine to six patients with dystonia (three with generalized dystonia and three with ST) who had failed to respond to previous pharmacotherapy. The drug was started at a dose of 200 mg/d by mouth and increased up to a maximum dose of 800 mg/d. Patients were evaluated at regular intervals over a 6-week period with use of the Fahn & Marsden Dystonia Scale and the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) and videotaped. At the end of the trial, the videotapes were reviewed and scored by a blind observer. Patients were then followed for at least 1 year and evaluated every 3 months at the dose reached during the study period. No adverse effects were reported in five patients; in one patient, dizziness developed at the dosage of 800 mg/d, requiring a reduction of the dose. At the end of a 6-week period, a significant improvement in the rating scale for dystonia and in videotape ratings was observed after mexiletine treatment (p < 0.01). Our data indicate that mexiletine is a useful drug in dystonia treatment.