Renal dose dopamine does not alter the response to beta-adrenergic stimulation by isoproterenol in healthy human volunteers.

OBJECTIVES: To determine if renal dose dopamine (3 microg/kg/min) alters the heart rate (HR) by itself, or if a dopamine infusion alters the HR response to bolus doses of the beta-adrenergic agonist isoproterenol in healthy human subjects. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Clinical laboratory of a university-affiliated academic medical center. SUBJECTS: A total of 15 healthy nonpregnant women and men aged 21 to 44 years. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were monitored continuously with bedside ECG, pulse oximetry, and ambulatory ECG recording to measure the maximal HR response to separate injections of 10, 20, and 30 ng/kg of isoproterenol, given before, during, and after the infusion of 3 microg/kg/min of dopamine. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Dopamine in the absence of isoproterenol did not alter baseline HR significantly (62.7+/-2.2 beats/min without dopamine; 65.4+/-2.2 with dopamine; p=0.15). All three doses of isoproterenol increased HR significantly above baseline, both in the presence and absence of dopamine (p<0.001). Dopamine infusion resulted in a higher HR following isoproterenol only for the 20-ng/kg dose. The incremental increases in HR, defined as the difference between peak HR following isoproterenol and baseline HR, were not increased during dopamine infusion for any of the doses of isoproterenol. Nausea was reported by 5 of the 15 subjects during the dopamine infusion. CONCLUSIONS: In healthy human subjects, infusion of 3 microg/kg/min of dopamine does not significantly increase the HR when combined with beta-adrenergic stimulation using isoproterenol, suggesting neither an additive nor antagonistic interaction between the two drugs. While our study did not demonstrate an increase in HR in healthy subjects, the risk of increasing the chronotropic response to beta-adrenergic inotropic medications with "renal dose" dopamine in critically ill patients needs to be investigated. The frequency of nausea during dopamine infusion also may influence consideration of using dopamine to augment splanchnic blood flow and renal function in conscious patients.

Effect on the duration of mechanical ventilation of identifying patients capable of breathing spontaneously.

BACKGROUND: Prompt recognition of the reversal of respiratory failure may permit earlier discontinuation of mechanical ventilation, without harm to the patient. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, controlled trial in 300 adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation in medical and coronary intensive care units. In the intervention group, patients underwent daily screening of respiratory function by physicians, respiratory therapists, and nurses to identify those possibly capable of breathing spontaneously; successful tests were followed by two-hour trials of spontaneous breathing in those who met the criteria. Physicians were notified when their patients successfully completed the trials of spontaneous breathing. The control subjects had daily screening but no other interventions. In both groups, all clinical decisions, including the decision to discontinue mechanical ventilation, were made by the attending physicians. RESULTS: Although the 149 patients randomly assigned to the intervention group had more severe disease, they received mechanical ventilation for a median of 4.5 days, as compared with 6 days in the 151 patients in the control group (P=0.003). The median interval between the time a patient met the screening criteria and the discontinuation of mechanical ventilation was one day in the intervention group and three days in the control group (P<0.001). Complications -- removal of the breathing tube by the patient, reintubation, tracheostomy, and mechanical ventilation for more than 21 days -- occurred in 20 percent of the intervention group and 41 percent of the control group (P=0.001). The number of days of intensive care and hospital care was similar in the two groups. Total costs for the intensive care unit were lower in the intervention group (median, $15,740, vs. $20,890 in the controls, P=0.03); hospital costs were lower, though not significantly so (median, $26,229 and $29,048, respectively; P=0.3). CONCLUSIONS: Daily screening of the respiratory function of adults receiving mechanical ventilation, followed by trials of spontaneous breathing in appropriate patients and notification of their physicians when the trials were successful, can reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation and the cost of intensive care and is associated with fewer complications than usual care.