RESUMO
Background: With novel therapies, more individuals are living longer with lung cancer (LC). This study aimed to understand the impacts of LC on life domains such as employment, finances, relationships, and healthcare needs. Methods: Individuals 18+, diagnosed with LC, 6-24 months post-treatment were recruited through an Australian LC cohort study (Embedding Research and Evidence in Cancer Healthcare-EnRICH). Demographic, clinical, quality-of-life and distress data were obtained through the EnRICH study database. Participants completed telephone interviews. Qualitative data were analysed via Framework methods. Results: Twenty interviews (10 females) were conducted. Most participants were diagnosed with advanced LC (Stage III =8, Stage IV =6), and were on average 17 (range, 10-24) months post-diagnosis. Four themes related to "carrying on with life" as a LC survivor were identified: (I) the winding path back to work: those working pre-diagnosis discussed challenges of maintaining/returning to employment, and the meaning and satisfaction derived from work. (II) Vulnerability versus protection: managing the financial impacts of LC: wide variations in financial impacts, some described lost income and high healthcare expenses, others felt financially protected. (III) Connection and loneliness: navigating relationships as a survivor: some experienced lost friendships due to their diagnosis, others noted more meaningful connections. (IV) Still under the umbrella: healthcare during survivorship: participants noted the importance of ongoing oncology team connection and the vital role of cancer care coordinators. Conclusions: Many individuals living with LC want to "carry on" with life. Participants spoke of challenges and opportunities across life domains of relationships, work, and finances, and noted the importance of continued specialist healthcare throughout survivorship.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Lung cancer continues to be the most common cause of cancer-related death and the leading cause of morbidity and burden of disease across Australia. There is an ongoing need to identify and reduce unwarranted clinical variation that may contribute to these poor outcomes for patients with lung cancer. An Australian national strategy acknowledges clinical quality outcome data as a critical component of a continuously improving healthcare system but there is a need to ensure clinical quality indicators adequately measure evidence-based contemporary care, including novel and emerging treatments. This study aimed to develop a suite of lung cancer-specific, evidence-based, clinically acceptable quality indicators to measure quality of care and outcomes, and an associated comparative feedback dashboard to provide performance data to clinicians and hospital administrators. DESIGN: A multistage modified Delphi process was undertaken with a Clinical Advisory Group of multidisciplinary lung cancer specialists, with patient representation, to update and prioritise potential indicators of lung cancer care derived from a targeted review of published literature and reports from national and international lung cancer quality registries. Quality indicators were piloted and evaluated with multidisciplinary teams in a retrospective observational cohort study using clinical audit data from the Embedding Research (and Evidence) in Cancer Healthcare Program, a prospective clinical cohort of over 2000 patients with lung cancer diagnosed from May 2016 to October 2021. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Six tertiary specialist cancer centres in metropolitan and regional New South Wales, Australia. RESULTS: From an initial 37 potential quality indicators, a final set of 10 indicators spanning diagnostic, treatment, quality of life and survival domains was agreed. CONCLUSIONS: These indicators build on and update previously available measures of lung cancer care and outcomes in use by national and international lung cancer clinical quality registries which, to our knowledge, have not been recently updated to reflect the changing lung cancer treatment paradigm.
