Evaluation of an Electronic Algorithm for Identifying Cisgender Female Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Candidates.

We previously developed an electronic medical record-based algorithm for identifying patients at risk for HIV in the emergency department (ED). The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the HIV risk algorithm for identifying cisgender women with a pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) indication. To retrospectively evaluate the HIV risk algorithm, we identified cisgender women with HIV diagnosed in the ED and retrospectively calculated the HIV risk algorithm output. To prospectively validate the algorithm, we surveyed cisgender women seeking care in the ED regarding behavioral risks for HIV. We prospectively determined whether the algorithm identified them as PrEP candidates. In the retrospective evaluation, 9.4% (2/21) of women with incident HIV infection were identified as at risk for HIV by the algorithm. In the prospective evaluation, 24% (59/245) of women who completed the survey had a PrEP indication based on self-report of behavioral risk factors for HIV. The sensitivity of the algorithm for identifying cisgender female PrEP candidates was 10%, and the specificity was 96%. PrEP indications missed by the electronic algorithm included condomless sex in a high HIV prevalence area, multiple sex partners, male partners who have sex with men, and recent bacterial sexually transmitted infections diagnosed at outside clinics. An electronic algorithm to identify PrEP candidates in the ED has low sensitivity for identifying cisgender women with PrEP indications. More research is needed to identify electronic data that can improve the algorithm sensitivity among cisgender women.

Black Cisgender Women's PrEP Knowledge, Attitudes, Preferences, and Experience in Chicago.

BACKGROUND: Although black cisgender women in Chicago continue to disproportionally account for new HIV diagnoses, few are on pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). We used concurrent mixed-methods to understand women's PrEP knowledge, attitudes, experience, and preferences in Chicago. SETTING AND METHODS: We surveyed 370 HIV(-) cisgender women visiting a sexually transmitted infection clinic (n = 120) or emergency department (n = 250). Two focus groups were conducted with PrEP-naive women, and interviews were conducted with 7 PrEP-experienced women. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression, and qualitative data using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Majority of women identified as black (83.0%) and had a regular source of health care (70.0%). In the past 6 months, 84.1% had vaginal or anal sex, most with inconsistent condom use (94.2%). Only 30.3% had heard of PrEP, but once explained, one-quarter considered starting PrEP, with protecting health (76.4%) and reducing HIV worry (58.1%) the most common reasons. Factors associated with considering PrEP included being Latina [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 3.30, 95% confidence interval (CI): (1.21 to 8.99)], recent sexually transmitted infection [aOR: 2.39, 95% CI: (1.25 to 4.59)], and higher belief in PrEP effectiveness [aOR: 1.85, 95% CI: (1.22 to 2.82)]. Most (81.1%) had concerns about taking PrEP with side effects a common concern. Qualitative themes aligned with survey results, revealing a disconnection from current PrEP marketing, need for community-level PrEP education/outreach, and importance of provider trust. LESSONS LEARNED: Despite significant PrEP implementation work in Chicago, less than one-third of women in our study had heard of PrEP. Once informed, PrEP attitudes and interest were positive. Translating these results into interventions reflecting women's preferences and barriers is critical to increase PrEP uptake by cisgender women in Chicago and elsewhere.

Exploring transgender legal name change as a potential structural intervention for mitigating social determinants of health among transgender women of color.

The purpose of this exploratory study was to examine the effects of legal name change on socioeconomic factors, general and transgender-related healthcare access and utilization, and transgender-related victimization in a sample of young transgender women (transwomen) of color. A cross-sectional group comparison approach was used to assess the potential effects of legal name change. A convenience sample of young transwomen enrolled in a no-cost legal name change clinic were recruited to complete a 30-minute interviewer-guided telephone survey including sociodemographic and socioeconomic factors, health and well-being, health care utilization, transgender transition-related health care, and transgender-related victimization. Sixty-five transgender women of color (37 = pre-name change group; 28 = post-name change group) completed the survey. Results indicated that the transwomen in the post-name change group were significantly older than the pre-name change group. In age-adjusted analyses, the post-name change group was significantly more likely to have a higher monthly income and stable housing than the pre-name change group. No significant differences were observed for general healthcare utilization; however, a significantly greater percentage of transwomen in the pre-name change group reported postponing medical care due to their gender identity. In addition, a significantly larger proportion of transwomen in the pre-name change group reported using non-prescribed hormones injected by friends and experiencing verbal harassment by family and friends compared to transwomen in the post-name change group. Findings suggest that legal name change may be an important structural intervention for low-income transwomen of color, providing increased socioeconomic stability and improved access to primary and transition-related health care.