"Listen to me, learn from me": a priority setting partnership for shaping interdisciplinary pain training to strengthen chronic pain care.

ABSTRACT: What are the care-seeking priorities of people living with chronic pain and carers and how can these shape interdisciplinary workforce training to improve high-value pain care? Phase 1: Australian people living with chronic pain (n = 206; 90% female) and carers (n = 10; 40% female) described their pain care priorities (eDelphi, round 1). A coding framework was inductively derived from 842 pain care priorities (9 categories, 52 priorities), including validation; communication; multidisciplinary approaches; holistic care; partnerships; practitioner knowledge; self-management; medicines; and diagnosis. Phase 2: In eDelphi round 2, panellists (n = 170; valid responses) rated the importance (1 = less important; 9 = more important) of the represented framework. In parallel, cross-discipline health professionals (n = 267; 75% female) rated the importance of these same priorities. Applying the RAND-UCLA method (panel medians: 1-3: "not important," 4-6: "equivocal," or 7-9: "important"), "important" items were retained where the panel median score was >7 with panel agreement ≥70%, with 44 items (84.6%) retained. Specific workforce training targets included the following: empathic validation; effective, respectful, safe communication; and ensuring genuine partnerships in coplanning personalised care. Panellists and health professionals agreed or strongly agreed (95.7% and 95.2%, respectively) that this framework meaningfully reflected the importance in care seeking for pain. More than 74% of health professionals were fairly or extremely confident in their ability to support care priorities for 6 of 9 categories (66.7%). Phase 3: An interdisciplinary panel (n = 5) mapped an existing foundation-level workforce training program against the framework, identifying gaps and training targets. Recommendations were determined for framework adoption to genuinely shape, from a partnership perspective, Australian interdisciplinary pain training.

Psychological impact of neonatal intensive care unit admissions on parents: A regional perspective.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to report the prevalence of adverse psychological symptoms and health behaviours of parents who had a baby admitted to a regional neonatal intensive care unit to spotlight mental health care in these unique settings. DESIGN: This was a prospective, prevalence-based study using quantitative data. SETTING: The study was conducted at the Townsville University Hospital, Queensland. PARTICIPANTS: Participants comprised 114 parents of 79 infants enrolled in the study (mothers = 69 and fathers = 45). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Trauma, depression, anxiety, stress, alcohol and drug use, prior mental health history and bonding experience were assessed by standardised self-report questionnaires and a structured diagnostic interview within 2 weeks and at 3 months post-admission to neonatal intensive care unit. RESULTS: Clinically significant acute trauma symptoms (16% of mothers only), depression (22% mothers; 4% of fathers), anxiety (27% mothers; 11% fathers) and stress (24% mothers; 13% fathers) were reported within the first 2 weeks after their baby was admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit. Notably, 18% of parents reported engaging in harmful alcohol use behaviour within 2 weeks post-birth; 29% of fathers continued to report risky drinking at 3 months. At 3 months, 21%, 8% and 6% of mothers met diagnostic criteria for generalised anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder, respectively. CONCLUSION: Screening for psychological distress and alcohol use of parents of neonatal intensive care unit babies can ensure that support services are made available post-discharge to optimise family function and development of the preterm infant.

Training general practitioners in remote Western Australia in a method of screening and brief intervention for harmful alcohol use: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: High levels of alcohol-related harm are a salient feature of many rural communities in Australia. General practitioners (GPs) are uniquely placed to identify and treat patients with harmful alcohol use in remote settings, yet corresponding opportunities for education in effective brief psychological interventions for harmful alcohol use are limited. This study piloted a training model for alcohol screening and brief intervention for GPs working in Kalgoorlie-Boulder, a remote Western Australian community facing significant alcohol-related problems. DESIGN: Observational pilot study. SETTING: Primary care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Perceived role in responding to harmful alcohol use, and confidence and knowledge of alcohol screening and brief intervention; satisfaction with a short training session focused on alcohol screening and brief intervention; and impact of training on implementation of screening and brief intervention for harmful alcohol use. RESULTS: Fifty per cent of GPs took up the training opportunity. GPs recognised their professional responsibility for conducting brief intervention but reported comparatively lower confidence and skills in implementing screening and intervention prior to training. The training improved knowledge and confidence in conducting alcohol screening and brief intervention. All GPs increased their frequency of alcohol screening, and 88% of GPs reported increasing the frequency of brief intervention at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary findings suggest that among participating GPs, subsequent compliance with identification and management of harmful alcohol use was improved. Further work examining methods to improve rural and remote GP participation in alcohol-related harm prevention training is required, as the potential impact on communities with disproportionately high alcohol-related difficulties is significant.

A pilot randomized controlled trial of an early multidisciplinary model to prevent disability following traumatic injury.

PURPOSE: Chronic pain, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and depression are common outcomes following traumatic injury. Yet, screening and early intervention to prevent the onset of these disorders do not occur routinely in acute trauma settings. This pilot study examined the clinical utility of screening and early multidisciplinary intervention for reducing disability following traumatic injury. METHOD: 142 non-severe head injured trauma inpatients (26% female, Injury Severity Score M = 9.65, M age = 36 years) were assessed for injury-related factors, pain, and psychological function within 4 weeks post injury. Patients were randomly allocated to a Multidisciplinary Intervention (MI) or Usual Care (UC) group. MI patients received assessment and treatment at one and 3 months post injury from pain and rehabilitation medicine doctors, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, and clinical psychologists. Outcomes at 6 months were then compared. RESULTS: Acute pain intensity, posttraumatic adjustment, depression and acute trauma symptoms, and alcohol use predicted a significant 26%, 49%, 56%, and 30% of the variance in pain, depressive, and PTSD severity, and physical mobility respectively at 6 months. Despite MI group patients reporting no improvement in the severity of pain and psychological symptoms, these patients reported significantly improved relief from pain symptoms as a result of treatment at 6 months. Twenty four per cent of the UC group initially below the cut-off for being at risk of developing PTSD/Depression received new clinical diagnoses at 6 months compared with none of the 'not at risk' MI group attendees who remained asymptomatic. CONCLUSIONS: Early findings point to the value of early screening to identify patients at risk of treatable pain, physical, and psychological impairments. Moreover, early multidisciplinary intervention models following traumatic injury show promise for protecting against the onset of posttraumatic psychological disorders.

Screening for harmful alcohol use in Australian trauma settings.

INTRODUCTION: High rates of trauma recidivism associated with alcohol use indicate the need to screen for alcohol consumption and related harm. Routine collection of prevalence data relating to alcohol use in Australian trauma settings is not undertaken currently, and diverse screening approaches are used across different settings. This study sought to examine the feasibility of routine screening for alcohol related injury and harmful alcohol use, and determine the prevalence of alcohol related injury and risky alcohol consumption amongst trauma patients in Western Australia. METHODS: A step-down model of screening for alcohol-related injury and harmful alcohol consumption was developed and trialled. Over a four month period at a statewide trauma service, 729 non-head injured trauma patients were screened using a two-item measure in emergency and acute surgical settings, and 538 patients who screened positive were subsequently administered a standardised self report measure of alcohol consumption. RESULTS: There was a 49% compliance rate with the Emergency Department brief screening protocol for alcohol related injury. Of those screened, 77% were identified by clinical staff as potentially having had an alcohol related injury or be engaging in risky drinking regularly. Sixty per cent of the screened patients who subsequently completed a standardised self report measure were identified as drinking at harmful levels (41% hazardous; 7% harmful; 12% dependent). Of these, 15% and 24% met the DSM-IV-TR criteria for alcohol abuse and dependence respectively. Approximately 30% of patients diagnosed with an alcohol use disorder were not identified by staff as having an alcohol-related injury or problem. Higher alcohol consumption was significantly associated with greater risk of depression and PTSD. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary findings suggest a high prevalence of alcohol-related injury, and harmful alcohol consumption. These findings point to an urgent need to develop reliable and economical screening protocols for harmful alcohol use across Australian trauma settings and the adoption of strategies to ensure their compliance, to enable accurate identification of those most likely to benefit from interventions to reduce alcohol related harm.

Predictors of patient satisfaction with pain management and improvement 3 months after burn injury.

UNLABELLED: Very little is known about what influences patient satisfaction with burn pain management. The aim of this prospective study was to examine predictors of patient satisfaction with pain management following burn injury. METHODS: Participants were 97 adult burn patients admitted to Royal Perth Hospital, Western Australia between June 2007 and February 2009. Key patient satisfaction domains were: pain treatment in hospital, pain medication provided, and improvement since hospitalisation. Acute pain medication use, pain severity, psychological symptoms, and patient expectations were assessed as potential predictors of patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Patients reported moderate to high levels of satisfaction across all domains. Whether treatment matched patients' expectations was a significant predictor of satisfaction with pain treatment, pain medication and improvement (p < .001, p < .001, p < .05 respectively). Current pain at follow-up was a significant predictor of satisfaction with pain treatment and improvement (p < .01, p < .001 respectively). Acute pain medication use, depressive symptoms and reductions in average pain at three months were not significant independent predictors of patient satisfaction with pain management and improvement in this sample (p > .35). Yet, severity of posttrauma symptoms at three months was a significant predictor of satisfaction with pain medication and was moderately and positively associated with satisfaction with pain treatment (p < .05, p = .07, respectively). DISCUSSION: These findings suggest that acute medication use and reductions in perceived pain symptoms are less closely related to patient satisfaction compared with treatment expectations, current pain and posttrauma symptoms. Collectively, these findings indicate a need to proactively address treatment expectations about pain management, and manage current pain and psychological distress following burn injury in order to improve patient satisfaction with care received.

Defining meaningful outcomes after decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury: existing challenges and future targets.

BACKGROUND: Optimal management of increased intra-cranial pressure following severe traumatic brain injury comprises a combination of sequential medical and surgical interventions. Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a cautiously recommended surgical option that has been shown to reduce intracranial pressure. Considerable variability in the timing and frequency of using DC across neurosurgical centres reflects, in part, the lack of clarity regarding long-term outcomes. The majority of previous work reporting outcomes among individuals who have received DC following traumatic brain injury (TBI) has focused predominantly on gross physical outcomes, to the relative exclusion of more subtle functional, social and psychological factors. AIM: This paper reviews the methodological aspects of previous studies that have reported outcomes following DC and provides recommendations to guide the future assessment of recovery to enable meaningful conclusions to be drawn from the literature describing outcomes after DC following severe TBI.

Persistent pain outcomes and patient satisfaction with pain management after burn injury.

OBJECTIVES: acute burn pain management has advanced significantly, yet little is known about long-term pain outcomes after severe burn injury. Even less is known about patient satisfaction with pain management after burn injury. This study examined the long-term pain and psychological outcomes of burn survivors who were treated at the Burns Service of Western Australia between 1994 and 2005. METHODS: of 2114 burn survivors who were mailed standardized self-report measures of pain, depressive, and posttraumatic stress symptoms, 492 returned completed questionnaires. Of these, 18%reported persistent burn-related pain, and 27% and 14% reported clinically significant depressive and posttraumatic stress symptoms, respectively. Those with persistent pain reported significantly more severe depressive and posttraumatic stress symptoms compared with those with no pain. Interestingly, respondents with persistent burn-related pain recalled significantly higher levels of procedural and dressing change acute pain than those without pain symptoms. Linear multiple regression analyses revealed that the extent to which pain treatment expectations were met predicted overall satisfaction with pain treatment, beyond the effects of perceived pain improvement, current burn pain intensity, depression and posttraumatic stress symptoms, age, sex, and total burn surface area. DISCUSSION: collectively, these findings suggest a significant proportion of severely injured burn survivors continue to experience persistent pain and point to the need to identify and treat persistent pain more effectively. Moreover, assessing and managing pain treatment expectations during the early phase of recovery postburn may yield improved levels of patient satisfaction with treatment received

The impact of personality and coping on the development of depressive symptoms in adult burns survivors.

This prospective study examined the extent to which the personality traits neuroticism, extraversion and agreeableness and coping styles approach, avoidant and ambivalent contribute to the development of depressive symptoms in adult burns survivors at three months post-injury. Participants were 70 adult burns survivors admitted to Royal Perth Hospital in Western Australia between June 2007 and February 2008. Personality was assessed using the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO-PI-R), coping was evaluated with the Coping with Burns Questionnaire (CBQ) and depressive symptoms were measured using The Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Twenty one percent of retained participants at three months (n=29) reported clinically significant depressive symptoms. There were no significant relationships between depressive symptoms at three months and demographic or burn characteristics. Neuroticism significantly predicted depressive symptoms at three-month follow-up and this relationship was significantly mediated by avoidant coping. In addition, extraversion, avoidant coping and approach coping were all significant and independent predictors of depressive symptoms at three months. These findings suggest that burns patients at greatest risk of developing clinically significant depressive symptoms may be identifiable in the acute recovery phase.

Core outcomes for adult burn survivors: a clinical overview.

Burn trauma ranges from the minor burn to the devastating injury, which can impact on all aspects of a person's life including aesthetic appearance, relationships with others and psychological, social and physical functioning. Measurement of outcome in burns patients is therefore complex and multi-faceted. The increasing numbers of major burn survivors implies that understanding health outcomes in these patients has assumed high priority. This paper sets out a conceptual framework for unifying outcome measurement, which may be useful to all members of the multidisciplinary team who are contemplating outcome assessment in their burn patients. It outlines seven core domains of assessment which are (i) skin; (ii) neuromuscular function; (iii) sensory and pain; (iv) psychological function; (v) physical role function; (vi) community participation; and (vii) perceived quality of life. Within each domain, we present a brief clinical review of the most commonly administered measurement tools that have been, or potentially could be, used to assess aspects of these core domains. Where possible, the psychometric properties and clinical utility of these tools are presented. A concise discussion of key methodological issues which should be addressed in this assessment process is then provided, together with suggestions for future research.