RESUMO
Transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) accounts for up to 10% of neoplasms of the upper urinary tract and usually manifests as hematuria. Imaging plays an important role in assessment of upper tract disease, unlike in bladder TCC, diagnosis of which is usually made at cystoscopy. Traditional imaging modalities, such as excretory urography, retrograde pyelography, and ultrasonography, still play pivotal roles in diagnosis of upper tract TCC, in combination with endourologic techniques. The multicentric nature of TCC makes assessment of the entire urothelium essential before treatment. The advent of minimally invasive surgery, which allows renal preservation in selected patients, makes accurate tumor staging mandatory to determine the appropriate therapy; staging is usually performed with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Vigilant urologic and radiologic follow-up is warranted to assess for metachronous lesions and recurrence. The emerging technique of CT urography allows detection of urinary tract tumors and calculi, assessment of perirenal tissues, and staging of lesions; it may offer the opportunity for one-stop evaluation in the initial assessment of hematuria and in follow-up of TCC. Similar MR imaging protocols can be used in patients who are not candidates for CT urography, although detection of urinary tract calcifications may be suboptimal.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células de Transição/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Renais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Ureterais/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/diagnóstico por imagem , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Ultrassonografia , Neoplasias Ureterais/diagnóstico por imagem , UrografiaAssuntos
Embolização Terapêutica/métodos , Emergências , Hemorragia/terapia , Leiomioma/complicações , Radiografia Intervencionista , Neoplasias Uterinas/complicações , Útero/irrigação sanguínea , Adulto , Feminino , Hemorragia/etiologia , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Útero/patologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the errors present in references cited in papers submitted for peer review for possible publication. METHODS: Nineteen consecutive manuscripts submitted for peer review were assessed. They contained a total of 261 references. Manuscripts were submitted to 1 of 5 major radiology journals. Journal references were compared with either the original articles or abstracts obtained through MEDLINE. Book references were checked against the original book. In total, 259 of 261 references were obtained. The remaining 2 references were both out-of-print books that were not available. Each reference was checked and errors were identified as either major or minor, depending on the gravity of the error. Errors were analyzed to see whether they could be attributed to not adhering to journal guidelines or to other reasons. RESULTS: Of a total of 259 references, 56% (n = 145) contained at least 1 error, 53% (n = 137) contained minor errors and 15% (n = 39) contained major errors. Five per cent (n = 13) of references had more than 3 errors, and 79% (n = 274) of all errors were the direct result of authors not following journal instructions. CONCLUSION: Over half of all references included in manuscripts submitted to radiology journals contain at least 1 error. The majority are avoidable, resulting from failure to follow the journal's instructions to authors.
Assuntos
Bibliografias como Assunto , Publicações Periódicas como Assunto/normas , Radiologia , Humanos , Revisão da Pesquisa por Pares , Editoração/normasAssuntos
Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Intensificação de Imagem Radiográfica , Radiografia Torácica , Volume Sistólico/fisiologia , Coração/diagnóstico por imagem , Coração/fisiologia , Humanos , Intensificação de Imagem Radiográfica/métodos , Sistemas de Informação em Radiologia , Ventriculografia com Radionuclídeos , Análise de Regressão , TóraxRESUMO
The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) in screening for suspected renovascular disease may result in increased detection of renal artery aneurysms. We report the CE-MRA findings at diagnosis and follow-up in nine hypertensive patients with unsuspected renal artery aneurysms. A search of renal CE-MRAs of suspected renal artery stenosis at two tertiary referral institutions over 5 1/2 years was performed. All patients underwent CE-MRA using a fast spoiled gradient echo technique (TR/TE/flip 5.1-6 ms/1.6 ms/40 degrees), scan matrix 512 x 196-224, 1 excitation, FOV 400-450 mm x 266-360 mm, 32-50 mm x 1.5-2 mm interpolated slices. Gadolinium-enhanced 3D images were obtained during breath holding. Images were evaluated and post-processed on a workstation by a single operator. Nine patients with renal artery aneurysms out of a total of 912 cases were found, all involving the main artery or divisions proximal to the renal hilum. Renal arteries distal to the hilum were not consistently visualized. The aneurysm was bilobed in one patient, multilocular in another and unilocular in all others. Severe stenosis of the renal artery proximal to the aneurysm was present in two. Four patients underwent follow-up showing no change in aneurysm size. CE-MRA reliably identifies aneurysms involving the main renal arteries and proximal branches. Once diagnosed, CE-MRA offers a safe, non-invasive modality for surveillance of aneurysm if active intervention is not planned.