Responses to the sensory properties of fat of neurons in the primate orbitofrontal cortex.

The primate orbitofrontal cortex is a site of convergence of information from primary taste, olfactory, and somatosensory cortical areas. We describe the responses of a population of single neurons in the orbitofrontal cortex that responds to fat in the mouth. The neurons respond, when fatty foods are being eaten, to pure fat such as glyceryl trioleate and also to substances with a similar texture but different chemical composition such as paraffin oil (hydrocarbon) and silicone oil [Si(CH3)2O)n]. This is evidence that the neurons respond to the oral texture of fat, sensed by the somatosensory system. Some of the population of neurons respond unimodally to the texture of fat. Other single neurons show convergence of taste inputs, and others of olfactory inputs, onto single neurons that respond to fat. For example, neurons were found that responded to the mouth feel of fat and the taste of monosodium glutamate (both found in milk), or to the mouth feel of fat and to odor. Feeding to satiety reduces the responses of these neurons to the fatty food eaten, but the neurons still respond to some other foods that have not been fed to satiety. Thus sensory-specific satiety for fat is represented in the responses of single neurons in the primate orbitofrontal cortex. Fat is an important constituent of food that affects its palatability and nutritional effects. The findings described provide evidence that the reward value (or pleasantness) of the mouth feel of fat is represented in the primate orbitofrontal cortex and that the representation is relevant to appetite.

Peripheral neural mechanisms determining the orientation of cylinders grasped by the digits.

When a human grasps a cylindrical object, feedback on the orientation of the cylinder with respect to the axes of the digits is crucial for successful manipulation of the object. We measured the ability of humans to discriminate the orientations of cylinders passively contacting the fingerpad. For a cylinder of curvature of 521 m-1 (radius, 1.92 mm) subjects were able to discriminate, at the 75% level, orientation differences of 5.4 degrees; for a less curved cylinder (curvature, 172 m-1; radius, 5.81 mm) the difference limen decreased to 4.2 degrees. The neural mechanisms underlying the determination of tactile orientation were investigated by recording the responses of single slowly adapting type I afferents (SAIs) innervating the fingerpads of anesthetized monkeys. When cylinders were stepped across the receptive field of an SAI, the resulting response profiles were Gaussian in shape; the shape corresponded to the shape of the cylinder, increasing in height and decreasing in width for more curved cylinders. All SAIs had the same underlying profile shape except for a multiplicative constant determined by the sensitivity of the individual afferent. Thus it was possible to reconstruct the response of the population of active SAIs in the fingerpad. Changing the orientation of the cylinder resulted in a rotation of the population response, but the change in angle of the population response was greater than the change in orientation of the cylinder. This discrepancy increased as the orientation of the cylinder moved closer to the orientation of the axis of the finger and was more pronounced for the less curved cylinder. Measured contact areas between the cylinders and the skin were elliptical, with orientations exceeding those of the cylinder; again the differences were greater for the less curved cylinder and for orientations closer to that of the finger axis. The human discrimination performance could be explained in terms of the SAI population responses.

Tactile resolution: peripheral neural mechanisms underlying the human capacity to determine positions of objects contacting the fingerpad.

We measured the ability of humans to discriminate the positions of spherical objects passively contacting the fingerpad. The discrimination threshold averaged 0.55 mm for a moderately curved sphere (radius 5.80 mm) and decreased to 0.38 mm for a more curved sphere (radius 1.92 mm); since the receptor density is about 1 per mm2, these values are substantially smaller than those predicted by the sampling theorem (referred to as hyperacuity). To elucidate the underlying neural mechanisms, responses to the same spheres and random sequences of stimuli were recorded from single Merkel afferents (SAIs) and Meissner afferents (RAs) in anesthetized monkeys. For multiple applications of identical stimuli, coefficients of variation of responses were around 3%. Profiles of responses across the SAI population were "hill-shaped." A change in position of the stimulus on the skin resulted in a matching shift of the profile, evident over the whole profile for the more curved sphere but ony at the skirts for the less curved sphere. The shift in response profiles, relative to the standard deviations, increased as the change in position increased, and was more reliable for the more curved sphere. Responses were measured over four time frames: 0.2, 0.3, 0.5, and 1.0 sec. Although responses increased with an increase in integration time, so, too, did their standard deviations, so that signal-to-noise ratios or the resolution in the SAI population was bout the same at 0.2 sec as at 1.0 sec. Only half the RAs responded; responses were small, but signalled reliable information about the position of the stimulus.

Representation of curved surfaces in responses of mechanoreceptive afferent fibers innervating the monkey's fingerpad.

The aim was to elucidate how the population of digital nerve afferents signals information about the shape of objects in contact with the fingerpads during fine manipulations. Responses were recorded from single mechanoreceptive afferent fibers in median nerves of anesthetized monkeys. Seven spherical surfaces were used, varying from a highly curved surface (radius, 1.44 mm; curvature, 694 m-1) to a flat surface (radius, infinity; curvature, 0 m-1). These were applied to the fibers' receptive fields, which were located on the central portion of a fingerpad. When the objects were located at the centers of the receptive fields, the responses of the slowly adapting fibers (SAIs) increased as the curvature of the surface increased and as the contact force increased. All SAIs behaved in the same way, differing only by a scaling factor (the sensitivity of the individual afferent). Responses of the rapidly adapting afferents were small and did not vary systematically with the stimulus parameters, and most Pacinians did not respond at all. Stimuli were applied at different positions in the receptive fields of SAIs to define the response profiles of the afferents (response as a function of position on the fingerpad). All SAIs had similarly shaped profiles for the same surface curvature and the shape differed for different curvatures. These profiles reflected the shape of the stimulus. An increase in contact force scaled these profiles upward. Thus, the population of digital nerve fibers signals unambiguous information about the shape and contact force of curved surfaces contacting the fingerpad.